Ive been looking around for what turbo I should go with now that Im upgrading to Crower rods that will take the power that the h beams I was on couldnt. So far Im leaning towards a pte 6765 bb billet turbo as Ive seen many people on here hitting 700+whp all the way to 921whp. But another thing I was thinking if the 6765 can make 900+whp maybe its slightly over what I need. Im not looking for a turbo just to name drop, Im looking for the best one for my setup, a 2.4l. Heres some turbos I was thinking about,

6765
6365
FP88
bw366
????

Any other suggestions? I want to hit 800+whp on c16 and 550-600+whp on 93 pump. Thanks

 

Why are you looking for 800 whp specifically?

Scorke

 

not 800 exact but want to break in the 800's

 

6765 done.

 

+1^

any other turbo even the hta37r made like 727 on 42 psi at 8000rpm by buschur.

so to make 800 without going 45 psi. 6765 ftmfwyo

 

But buschur has a very low reading dyno. Im not worried about high boost 45psi+ as it will only see it on the dyno and at the track. Thats why I want to hit 600whp on pump for the street.

 

3586 can do that. and itll spool nice. 5500rpm full boost to redline and with a 2.4 it'll be better. rather deadly street turbo imo.

 

billet 6765...

 

the 6765 will make the power but with a 2.4 that won't leave you with much powerband to play with.

 

Full boost should be before 5.5k, Mike said they were seeing full boost on their 2.0 around 6100rpm and full boost was 48psi iirc. Figure full boost by 5.5k with a 6k-8k power band and Ill also make more tq than a 2.0. But what turbo would you suggest to hit 800+whp on a 2.4l?

I was thinking about a small nitrous kit to speed up spool. Thoughts?

 

The 6765 with all the supporting mods.. 1.1 hotside. and look into the S4xx Borg Warner. Have fun, and hope you dont break too much..

 

6-8k powerband is going to suck it up...you'll shift at 8, land under the torque curve and wait for spool most likely. The guys running the 6765 are likely shifting at 9000rpm minimum. The HTA86 will spool better and give you a broader power band, it won't make quite as much power I suspect but the average down the track will likely be better because you won't fall out of power as badly if at all.

I think you're focusing too much on peak numbers instead of average.

 

+1^ to maximize the 6765 you need to shift high. the 3586 on pump should atleast be looked into.

 

Thats why I brought up the 6365. I remember seeing a dyno of a 6265 it hitting high 700's, though maybe the 6365 would flow enough to hit low 800's.

 

Heres what Map did with a 2.3l and a 6765. (Hope MAP doesnt mind I copied the dyno sheet from their thread). Figure ill have about 150rpm sooner spool so a 150rpm bigger power band lol.