TS T4 1.06a/r HTA3586

Reply Subscribe

Thread Tools

Search this Thread

Oct 8, 2010 | 04:23 AM

#106

dieselmd

Evolving Member

iTrader: (20)

Joined: Oct 2007

Posts: 330

Likes: 1

From: Summerville, SC

Quote:

Originally Posted by davidbuschur

Dieselmd, Matts car had a GT40 on it, then a GT42 and now an HTA86, I believe all of those we on the same header. Our black car had T3's, T4 single and twin scroll and quite a few really good turbo tests done on it. We must have got something right on that car, it's held the mph record now for 4 years, just throwing that out there.

With all the arguing lately I'll avoid posting dyno sheets here.

No worries.

Dec 25, 2010 | 12:56 PM

#107

JohnBradley

Evolved Member

iTrader: (30)

Joined: Jan 2004

Posts: 11,406

Likes: 78

From: Northwest

Quote:

Originally Posted by Philthy748

Dyno #'s aside, @ 21psi on straight pump gas ~560whp on Jeff Evans Dynapack, my car trapped over 130mph... 27psi on straight pump gas it made 640whp - that's never going to happen on a 3586.

Not trying to restart a shezzlestorm, but when I went to the dyno the other day and put down 648whp on straight pump, I doublechecked 21 and 23psi. I was at 555 at 21psi and 588 at 23psi still. Seems that Jeff's dyno (least on that day) reads very close to our DJ.

Dec 25, 2010 | 03:34 PM

#108

Philthy748

Evolved Member

iTrader: (21)

Joined: May 2006

Posts: 536

Likes: 1

From: New Jersey

Quote:

Originally Posted by JohnBradley

Seems pretty much spot on - Jeffs dyno has always been very close to DJ #'s... Every once in a while a Hater will come out and claim his dyno reads very high, but with trap speeds to back it up, they are silenced...

Dec 25, 2010 | 07:06 PM

#109

Aby@MIL.SPEC

Former Sponsor

iTrader: (161)

Joined: Jun 2003

Posts: 3,043

Likes: 13

From: San Elijo Hills, Ca.

Quote:

Originally Posted by davidbuschur

Having 500 ft lbs at 3000'ish rpm and running 9.5's should be proof enough of that.

That would be better than sliced bread!

if you have that recipe, that would be called "having your cake & eating it too"

Merry Christmas to all, especially those fighting for our country

Dec 25, 2010 | 08:11 PM

#110

BLKCarbonEVO

Thread Starter

Evolved Member

iTrader: (2)

Joined: Nov 2008

Posts: 3,463

Likes: 4

From: VaBeach, VA

Merry Christmas to you too Aby. Also to the rest of my fellow military guys/gals that couldn't be home for the holidays.

Mikey

Dec 25, 2010 | 08:28 PM

#111

BiFfMaN

Evolving Member

iTrader: (3)

Joined: Jul 2006

Posts: 468

Likes: 5

From: Las Vegas

Quote:

Originally Posted by Aby@MIL.SPEC

That would be better than sliced bread!

if you have that recipe, that would be called "having your cake & eating it too"

Merry Christmas to all, especially those fighting for our country

They actually served a good meal for us at Kandahar AB

Dec 26, 2010 | 10:23 AM

#112

BURNALL_4

Evolved Member

iTrader: (16)

Joined: Oct 2005

Posts: 1,984

Likes: 0

From: Albany, NY

Is say go with a t3 HTA 3586 .82 that hotside with your bottom end will spool like a mahcine. And will have no issues making your power goal.

Mar 15, 2015 | 07:24 AM

#113

sssr20det510

Evolving Member

Joined: Sep 2014

Posts: 192

Likes: 0

From: vancouver washington

I know this is an old thread but has ATP fixed there casting or is there a better twin scroll housing to use? Looking at doing a hta3582r with a t4 twin scroll.

Mar 15, 2015 | 07:50 AM

#114

Grimgrak

Evolved Member

iTrader: (3)

Joined: Dec 2011

Posts: 1,622

Likes: 17

From: Panama

Funny i just went with a t3 ts 1.01 gt30 NI resist. Which is the newer material and costs double what the old one did.

Mar 15, 2015 | 07:01 PM

#115

240Z TwinTurbo

Evolved Member

iTrader: (25)

Joined: Jun 2006

Posts: 2,810

Likes: 329

From: Charlotte, NC

Quote:

Originally Posted by Grimgrak

Funny i just went with a t3 ts 1.01 gt30 NI resist. Which is the newer material and costs double what the old one did.

I was running the 1.01a/r v-band TS turbine housing from Garrett and it has equivalent flow to a 1.01 a/r open scroll. This new sizing strategy likely applies to the T3 TS units as well. I worked for Honeywell so I had conversations directly with the engineers and for the vband stuff a TS a/r has equivalent flow to OS a/r.