Big vs Small throttle body
So you want me to post? I have posted that there was an 8whp gain at 700whp going from the following-
4" Garrett core FMIC
2.5" piping
MIL.SPEC 65mm
to
5" Garrett core
3" UICP
Boomba 75mm
Both runs were the same boost (41psi) on Q16.
I will look for the dyno sheet right now.
Aaron
4" Garrett core FMIC
2.5" piping
MIL.SPEC 65mm
to
5" Garrett core
3" UICP
Boomba 75mm
Both runs were the same boost (41psi) on Q16.
I will look for the dyno sheet right now.
Aaron
My bad, it was 13 peak and some across the powerband-

Dyno MAP sensor was offline, I only have the log of the 708 on my computer but it was 40+psi to get the gains and even then it was only over 6k.
If dollar per hp isnt important to you I would say go for it. If you dont want to spend $100/hp (and that was on the hookup) then probably should stick with the more proven combo.
aaron

Dyno MAP sensor was offline, I only have the log of the 708 on my computer but it was 40+psi to get the gains and even then it was only over 6k.
If dollar per hp isnt important to you I would say go for it. If you dont want to spend $100/hp (and that was on the hookup) then probably should stick with the more proven combo.
aaron
Last edited by JohnBradley; Jan 25, 2011 at 11:24 AM.
In the next 2 weeks I'm testing the following on my Evo X in stages on the dyno:
1) Larger Plenum Intake Manifold with stock TB and 2.5" cold side piping
2) Larger Plenum Intake Manifold with 75mm TB and 2.5" cold side piping
3) Larger Plenum Intake Manifold with 75mm TB and 3.0" cold side piping
The Intake Manifold in stages 2 and 3 will be a second one that I'm having a 75mm inlet and flange welded onto.
We'll see once and for all if these upgrades will make any difference on a 550-650 crank HP setup. Possibly I might test 2.75" cold side piping since a ~70mm pipe probably flows similar to a 75mm TB when you consider the TB shaft going through the middle.
1) Larger Plenum Intake Manifold with stock TB and 2.5" cold side piping
2) Larger Plenum Intake Manifold with 75mm TB and 2.5" cold side piping
3) Larger Plenum Intake Manifold with 75mm TB and 3.0" cold side piping
The Intake Manifold in stages 2 and 3 will be a second one that I'm having a 75mm inlet and flange welded onto.
We'll see once and for all if these upgrades will make any difference on a 550-650 crank HP setup. Possibly I might test 2.75" cold side piping since a ~70mm pipe probably flows similar to a 75mm TB when you consider the TB shaft going through the middle.
This isn't surprising, as no matter how much air density (boost) we're throwing at it, we're still dealing with the volumetric demands of a tiny 2.0L engine, and factors like ideal TB and IC tubing diameter logically seem to be a function of volumetric consumption (cfm) more so than power.
I suspect much of what improvement can be realized from larger TBs in this case result from reduced turbulence (e.g. reducing or eliminating the step).
Just my $0.02.
I have said it many times over. It seems to just be a big waste of time and money. I have no problem testing it though and will. Should be interesting to see the gains and losses.
-Em
-Em
Which reflects an improvement of <2%, which more or less lies along the threshold of variation between different dyno runs.
This isn't surprising, as no matter how much air density (boost) we're throwing at it, we're still dealing with the volumetric demands of a tiny 2.0L engine, and factors like ideal TB and IC tubing diameter logically seem to be a function of volumetric consumption (cfm) more so than power.
I suspect much of what improvement can be realized from larger TBs in this case result from reduced turbulence (e.g. reducing or eliminating the step).
Just my $0.02.
This isn't surprising, as no matter how much air density (boost) we're throwing at it, we're still dealing with the volumetric demands of a tiny 2.0L engine, and factors like ideal TB and IC tubing diameter logically seem to be a function of volumetric consumption (cfm) more so than power.
I suspect much of what improvement can be realized from larger TBs in this case result from reduced turbulence (e.g. reducing or eliminating the step).
Just my $0.02.
Not to seem like I am backtracking but it did add 20whp right where I had it selected from smoothing it seems. Thats why peak numbers dont always matter, sometimes its average increase. Even then 20whp on a 695whp total setup is a small gain for $1500.
Aaron was that Jessee's car?
For the money I would stick to the 65mm MilSpec. I may be going to a 4.5" FMIC and 3" UICP and 70-75mm throttle body in the future but I'm not looking for much of a gain honestly. I would be happy with 10whp. My goal is to make the most power on the lowest boost.
Mikey
For the money I would stick to the 65mm MilSpec. I may be going to a 4.5" FMIC and 3" UICP and 70-75mm throttle body in the future but I'm not looking for much of a gain honestly. I would be happy with 10whp. My goal is to make the most power on the lowest boost.
Mikey
Aaron, thanks for the comparison data on our TB vs. a larger unit.
IIRC, on Lucas' maxed-out E98 Evo (and I stress maxed-out), he didn't show any gains on the dyno with our TB. BUT, he showed the car going leaner and once he took it to the track, he gained a few MPH in the 1/4 mile (3-4MPH I think it was).
The benefits of a MIL.SPEC 65mm ported TB are increased power (~8-10 whp, sometimes more, depending on mods) AND increased throttle response.
IIRC, on Lucas' maxed-out E98 Evo (and I stress maxed-out), he didn't show any gains on the dyno with our TB. BUT, he showed the car going leaner and once he took it to the track, he gained a few MPH in the 1/4 mile (3-4MPH I think it was).
The benefits of a MIL.SPEC 65mm ported TB are increased power (~8-10 whp, sometimes more, depending on mods) AND increased throttle response.
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (42)
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,588
Likes: 2
From: Rochester, NY
So of the stock throttle body ported is the best bet what would then be the perfect intake manifold to compliment it and give the best results for a DD that sees the drag strip every now and then?
There is no "perfect" or "best" answer. It depends on what you're looking to do. For some, a larger than OEM aftermarket throttle body may be the better option.









