Notices
Evo Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain Everything from engine management to the best clutch and flywheel.

Issue installing GSC S2 Cams.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 31, 2011 | 10:36 PM
  #1  
TheBoz's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,279
Likes: 15
From: Space time
Issue installing GSC S2 Cams.

So I was torquing the Camshaft Position Sensing Cylinder (98+/-8 ft-lb). The bolt did a reverse mushroom. So a few questions is that the correct torque spec, as per the FSM it is. The next question has anyone had this happen before?

Here is the pic of the parts.

Attached Thumbnails Issue installing GSC S2 Cams.-parts-i-need.jpg  
Reply
Old Dec 31, 2011 | 10:58 PM
  #2  
wizzo 8's Avatar
Evolved Member
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Liked
Loved
iTrader: (35)
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 3,836
Likes: 14
From: Chicago suburbs
That torque spec can't be right. I think the cam gear to camshaft is only 90ftlbs. Personally I think it is half that torque. Maybe 40ftlbs for that sensor wheel
Reply
Old Dec 31, 2011 | 11:11 PM
  #3  
Hendrixmx's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (35)
 
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 198
Likes: 0
From: Oak Harbor Wa
When i torqued mine i questioned the spec as well. I think I ended up torquing it to 70ish.
Reply
Old Dec 31, 2011 | 11:13 PM
  #4  
burnzy's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 281
Likes: 0
From: Melbourne, Australia
that is most definately WRONG, 22nm is only 16 ft lb...it's showing up the oil pressure reg bolt as 11nm and 98 ft lb too, that thing would snap at about 30lb ft let alone 98.

Last edited by burnzy; Dec 31, 2011 at 11:18 PM.
Reply
Old Dec 31, 2011 | 11:29 PM
  #5  
TheBoz's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,279
Likes: 15
From: Space time
Originally Posted by burnzy
that is most definately WRONG, 22nm is only 16 ft lb...it's showing up the oil pressure reg bolt as 11nm and 98 ft lb too, that thing would snap at about 30lb ft let alone 98.
Wow do I feel like a complete dick. I should have checked that out. 22nm == 16ft-lb. Damn I was trying to get to 98ft-lb and the closest I could get was 75ft-lb before the head of the bolt just mushroomed.
Reply
Old Jan 1, 2012 | 06:38 AM
  #6  
TommiM's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (19)
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 3,205
Likes: 2
From: SoCal
idk, that seems like a lot. 98 ft lbs for that bolt! Hmmm. it looks like a typo and might actually mean 98 inch/ lbs.
Reply
Old Jan 1, 2012 | 09:09 AM
  #7  
TheBoz's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,279
Likes: 15
From: Space time
Ya I figurd I would post up, because it seems very easy to make this error if you follow the FSM. I have destroyed the bolt and cylinder, so I am going to replace those.

So to everyone, if the number seems wrong, check it aginst the NM spec and see if the numbers add up. This was a 50 dollar mistake, and requires that I wait 3 days before getting the car running again.
Reply
Old Jan 1, 2012 | 09:19 AM
  #8  
longdingydong's Avatar
Account Disabled
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 136
Likes: 0
From: fl
its always the little things that get cha. sry to hear, but lesson learned.
Reply
Old Jan 1, 2012 | 09:52 AM
  #9  
browningderek's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 573
Likes: 0
From: MoTown,GA
That bolt i always torque it till it feels good. But again i been doing this my whole life so i guess i got the touch. 98 ft lbs on that small bolt is funny BOZ, come on man........
Reply
Old Jan 1, 2012 | 10:04 AM
  #10  
TheBoz's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,279
Likes: 15
From: Space time
Originally Posted by browningderek
That bolt i always torque it till it feels good. But again i been doing this my whole life so i guess i got the touch. 98 ft lbs on that small bolt is funny BOZ, come on man........
LOL, ya there was a point where I was like this seems wrong, but there it is in the FSM. I should have listened to my gutt. When ever doing anything related to the motor I always refer to the FSM, and this time it ****ed me.

I mean hell the Cam Caps are 20nm(15ftlb), and that bolt was 22nm, that should have tipped me off right away that 98ftlb was wrong.

It is not a huge problem, I am sure it was better that I was not out street tuning the evo last night .
Reply
Old Jan 1, 2012 | 10:09 AM
  #11  
todd6027's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 1,861
Likes: 13
From: Ireland
maybe you should edit the thread title to something more appropriate
Reply
Old Jan 1, 2012 | 12:11 PM
  #12  
TommiM's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (19)
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 3,205
Likes: 2
From: SoCal
Originally Posted by TheBoz
LOL, ya there was a point where I was like this seems wrong, but there it is in the FSM. I should have listened to my gutt. When ever doing anything related to the motor I always refer to the FSM, and this time it ****ed me.

I mean hell the Cam Caps are 20nm(15ftlb), and that bolt was 22nm, that should have tipped me off right away that 98ftlb was wrong.

It is not a huge problem, I am sure it was better that I was not out street tuning the evo last night .
ya, its just a bolt. Lesson learned. Good info though for anyone else on here looking to do a cam install soon.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
AWD Motorsports
EvoX 'For Sale' External Engine / Power
58
Aug 12, 2015 09:58 AM
JorgeYaHeard
Project Cars / Build Threads
18
Jan 14, 2013 06:47 PM
vastevo
Evo X Dyno Results
46
Sep 26, 2012 07:12 AM
siegelracing
For Sale - Cars For Sale
13
Dec 16, 2011 10:40 AM
siegelracing
For Sale - Cars For Sale
48
Oct 13, 2011 08:58 AM




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 12:16 PM.