6262 Or Engine Rebuild?
#1
Newbie
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Easton, PA
Posts: 43
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
6262 Or Engine Rebuild?
So I'm stumped right now. I have money to do either one. People are saying 6262 on stock block is good to do because the power band is higher up in the RPMS. Considering that I'm eventually going to rebuild my the botom end this year, maybe 4-6 months later would it be smart for me to do a 6262 on a stock block?
Trending Topics
#12
Evolved Member
iTrader: (3)
^ He wouldnt risk the motor if he keeps it reliable. He said 4-6 months, thats not too long just driving the car conservative. Decent tune on pump gas, car will be still fun on the stock block for awhile. If he goes ***** to the wall on the stock block with the 6262 or 6266 then yea he might have a problem. I was making around 450 on a mustang dyno on a Fp Red and it lasted over a year before it blew. And that was constant abuse running 10.50s. I guess he can go either way, but its really just what he feels like doing. Good luck man.
#14
Evolved Member
iTrader: (8)
^ He wouldnt risk the motor if he keeps it reliable. He said 4-6 months, thats not too long just driving the car conservative. Decent tune on pump gas, car will be still fun on the stock block for awhile. If he goes ***** to the wall on the stock block with the 6262 or 6266 then yea he might have a problem. I was making around 450 on a mustang dyno on a Fp Red and it lasted over a year before it blew. And that was constant abuse running 10.50s. I guess he can go either way, but its really just what he feels like doing. Good luck man.
Its a double sided coin, in the end, do what you wanna do
#15
Evolved Member
iTrader: (2)
If u have the patience to run around with a turbo capable of making a lot more power than ur tune is giving you than you will probably be ok. If so ur a better man than me!