Notices
Evo Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain Everything from engine management to the best clutch and flywheel.

quaition on new 6466 vs 6766 .

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 3, 2012 | 09:48 AM
  #31  
JohnBradley's Avatar
Evolved Member
Shutterbug
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (30)
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 11,406
Likes: 78
From: Northwest
Originally Posted by evodan2004
is that good? sorry im not being sarcastic. i just dont know.
For a non MIVEC car yes I am impressed. Its not twin scroll as far as I know, so to put that into perspective my car spools 300rpm sooner is all. 111mph trap should be something like high 130s if it wasnt spinning, spinning though it could be in the 140s right now.

Aaron
Reply
Old May 3, 2012 | 01:46 PM
  #32  
Svendiesel's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (25)
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,730
Likes: 3
From: Teh internets.
Originally Posted by maperformance
Umm, no its not.... Its cheaper than the 67....
Right on Precisions website its $710 more

$1909.99 vs $1199.99

Last edited by Svendiesel; May 3, 2012 at 01:49 PM.
Reply
Old May 3, 2012 | 03:46 PM
  #33  
JohnBradley's Avatar
Evolved Member
Shutterbug
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (30)
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 11,406
Likes: 78
From: Northwest
Sorry I was incorrect on both the turbo and engine. It is a 2.3 with a 6266. Still impressive for both response and 1/8 mile.
Reply
Old May 3, 2012 | 04:04 PM
  #34  
Svendiesel's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (25)
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,730
Likes: 3
From: Teh internets.
Aaron what youre saying is that I need a 6466 to show what that thing can really do. High 5's at 125 in the 1/8th?
Reply
Old May 3, 2012 | 04:07 PM
  #35  
JohnBradley's Avatar
Evolved Member
Shutterbug
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (30)
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 11,406
Likes: 78
From: Northwest
I am saying that the 6266 seems to be performing so if you really wanted a 6466 I'd still be your friend.



Aaron
Reply
Old May 3, 2012 | 05:46 PM
  #36  
talonspyder97's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
From: Severna Park, MD
6466 is only available as a ball bearing turbo. Need to compare apples to apples. the price on PTE website for the 67 is a journal bearing.
Reply
Old May 3, 2012 | 07:00 PM
  #37  
Svendiesel's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (25)
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,730
Likes: 3
From: Teh internets.
Originally Posted by JohnBradley
I am saying that the 6266 seems to be performing so if you really wanted a 6466 I'd still be your friend.



Aaron
Oh goodyyyy because Im planning on needing a fresh e-tune from you in the not too distant future for one that may end up under my hood

I need to email you too soon actually, I have a new WGA on my EF4 and I just wanna send you a log to be sure everythings still cool with duty cycles and what not, I just need to pop a spring in it and do a boost leak test.
Reply
Old May 3, 2012 | 07:51 PM
  #38  
Anarchy99's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (196)
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 1,196
Likes: 0
From: Orlando/ Kissimmee
Originally Posted by talonspyder97
6466 is only available as a ball bearing turbo. Need to compare apples to apples. the price on PTE website for the 67 is a journal bearing.
its like +600 for bb
Reply
Old May 3, 2012 | 08:05 PM
  #39  
maperformance's Avatar
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (358)
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 12,805
Likes: 20
From: Cottage Grove, MN
6266 - 1599.99
6466 - 1909.99
6766 - 2109.99
Reply
Old May 4, 2012 | 08:09 AM
  #40  
EVO(boss)'s Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 570
Likes: 2
From: KSA
I'm just waiting for results of the new 6466 , but the 6766 is still in the top as what I can see .
Reply
Old May 4, 2012 | 08:46 AM
  #41  
maperformance's Avatar
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (358)
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 12,805
Likes: 20
From: Cottage Grove, MN
Might be "top" because of maybe a few extra HP, but I don't see that as "top". I look at the overall performance of the turbo. Faster spool and 950+whp capable. That is "top" for me, even though I'm not ever going to make that power, I might still run it on my setup haha.
Reply
Old May 4, 2012 | 09:12 AM
  #42  
talonspyder97's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
From: Severna Park, MD
Buschur should have some results this week I believe According to FB anyway.
Reply
Old May 4, 2012 | 09:16 AM
  #43  
maperformance's Avatar
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (358)
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 12,805
Likes: 20
From: Cottage Grove, MN
Sweetness.
Reply
Old May 4, 2012 | 09:30 AM
  #44  
EVO(boss)'s Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 570
Likes: 2
From: KSA
Originally Posted by maperformance
Might be "top" because of maybe a few extra HP, but I don't see that as "top". I look at the overall performance of the turbo. Faster spool and 950+whp capable. That is "top" for me, even though I'm not ever going to make that power, I might still run it on my setup haha.
I saw the Vid of the car ur talking about did 954whp on 50psi T4 6466/.1.32 A/R and its still on stock head . I dont know how they did this power ..
I will send u my sheet ones my car is done at 50psi then we will see
Reply
Old May 4, 2012 | 11:29 AM
  #45  
maperformance's Avatar
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (358)
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 12,805
Likes: 20
From: Cottage Grove, MN
Hope you can get a real tuner to tune it this time!
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 06:14 PM.