Notices
Evo Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain Everything from engine management to the best clutch and flywheel.

If cost was not a factor; Stock frame or T4 setup for 450-550 hp

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 19, 2012 | 05:18 PM
  #16  
8UpUrV8's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 553
Likes: 0
From: Houston
I belive the PTE 5857 is discontinued and the CEA 5858 took its place.

Contenders in that region are the EFR 7670, PTE CEA 5858, GTX3076R/3071R, HTA3076.

However HTA 3076 seems to have the most results on the web. Dave has a thread on one he used on his stoker, he seemed to love it as a 600whp max turbo.

I hear boost control is far superior with external WG's that internals. That may be another consideration if you plan on road racing.

Last edited by 8UpUrV8; Aug 19, 2012 at 05:24 PM.
Reply
Old Aug 19, 2012 | 05:19 PM
  #17  
SmurfZilla's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (33)
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 5,313
Likes: 1
From: Raleigh, Transplanted from Toronto, Canada
ANy numbers on it?
Reply
Old Aug 19, 2012 | 06:22 PM
  #18  
8UpUrV8's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 553
Likes: 0
From: Houston
From Dave's thread,

HTA3076 34->27 psi

HTA3586
HTA3082 (FP3065 conversion)
HTA3076 .63 T3 (The HTA3076 hit 610 ft lbs and 609 whp in the .82 housing)

2500 rpm, HTA86, 115/57
2500 rpm, HTA82, 125/62
2500 rpm, HTA76, 125/62

3000 rpm, HTA86, 133/76
3000 rpm, HTA82, 144/82
3000 rpm, HTA76, 153/87

3500 rpm, HTA86, 181/120
3500 rpm, HTA82, 207/138
3500 rpm, HTA76, 233/155

4000 rpm, HTA86, 281/214
4000 rpm, HTA82, 342/260
4000 rpm, HTA76, 414/315

4500 rpm, HTA86, 456/390
4500 rpm, HTA82, 482/410
4500 rpm, HTA76, 520/440

5000 rpm, HTA86, 540/510
5000 rpm, HTA82, 516/486
5000 rpm, HTA76, 529/499

5500 rpm, HTA86, 546/567
5500 rpm, HTA82, 513/532
5500 rpm, HTA76, 522/542

8000 rpm, HTA86, 458/679
8000 rpm, HTA82, 389/579
8000 rpm, HTA76, 378/563
Reply
Old Aug 19, 2012 | 07:11 PM
  #19  
SmurfZilla's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (33)
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 5,313
Likes: 1
From: Raleigh, Transplanted from Toronto, Canada
thank you for that information
Reply
Old Aug 19, 2012 | 08:05 PM
  #20  
High_PSI's Avatar
Evolved Member
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (50)
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 4,152
Likes: 17
A single scroll 3076 IMHO has nO use due to the FP RED and BLACK.
Reply
Old Aug 19, 2012 | 08:19 PM
  #21  
deeman101's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (34)
 
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 1,142
Likes: 46
From: Bethesda, MD
Originally Posted by High_PSI
A single scroll 3076 IMHO has nO use due to the FP RED and BLACK.

Yes the original 3071 and 3076 are old hat compared to modern fp/cbrd/map turbos. The GTX versions really bring something new and relevant though. Especially in T4 twin scroll. Just take a look at 240z twin turbo's gtx3076r results in his dyno thread.
Reply
Old Aug 19, 2012 | 08:30 PM
  #22  
Blue91lx's Avatar
Evolved Member
10 Year Member
iTrader: (44)
 
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 2,154
Likes: 5
From: Philadelphia, PA
Originally Posted by High_PSI
A single scroll 3076 IMHO has nO use due to the FP RED and BLACK.
I completely agree. Unless you're buying the GTX series a Red would be a much better turbo.
Reply
Old Aug 19, 2012 | 09:02 PM
  #23  
MrLith's Avatar
Evolved Member
 
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 715
Likes: 17
From: Welly NZ
Look at maybe a FP GT3076HTA? Buschur tried one out some time ago and sang its praises quite nicely, iirc it basically schooled an EFR7670 setup on the same motor - or something along those lines.

Edit - missed that there was already a page 2 in this thread making my post almost redundant, so consider this a +1 for the HTA76
Reply
Old Aug 20, 2012 | 12:59 PM
  #24  
High_PSI's Avatar
Evolved Member
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (50)
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 4,152
Likes: 17
Originally Posted by deeman101
Yes the original 3071 and 3076 are old hat compared to modern fp/cbrd/map turbos. The GTX versions really bring something new and relevant though. Especially in T4 twin scroll. Just take a look at 240z twin turbo's gtx3076r results in his dyno thread.
Fine but you are giving up twin scroll which is a HUGE HUGE benefit. You are also giving up a stock frame turbo which keeps and Evo an evo verses some laggy car that makes power up top. I DD a Red and get boost in the 3000's on a street car with a Stock Bottom end. The way I see relevant turbos is this:

Stock IX Turbo
HKS Bolt On turbo for faster than stock spool and slightly more power.
BB GREEN-RED-BLACK. The last two are 9 second turbos PEOPLE the Green is an Easy ten Second turbo all with great spool and factory characteristics. The Black does begin however to show more on-off characteristics which is why I have the RED.
GT35R, spools later than a Black but is a tried and true monster
62- Variants, great but laggy but make BIG power if that is what you want.

The 40-42R series. Obviously top end monsters.

There are other stock Frame turbos but none that I personally like but if you do more power to you.
Reply
Old Aug 20, 2012 | 01:21 PM
  #25  
Acree's Avatar
Evolved Member
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 787
Likes: 1
From: Dallas
Smurf,

Just copy my build. That's all you need to do. I'm having mine retuned on SD for E85 and 93 this week. I will have dyno plots of both, PLUS a road race tune on 93. The black is the best of all worlds. Turn it down to 24 psi for a road race or throw E85 back into it and turn the wick up to 35psi for 650hp. No brainer.

-Acree
Reply
Old Aug 20, 2012 | 01:22 PM
  #26  
240Z TwinTurbo's Avatar
Evolved Member
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Liked
Loved
iTrader: (25)
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 2,810
Likes: 329
From: Charlotte, NC
I would not recommend a GT30r turbine wheel for a 2.4L. I have shown on my 2L that the GTX3576r will spool as fast as a GTX3076r, but make more power on top. For Garrett options the GTX3576r would be the right choice. No need to go to the larger GTX3582r for a solid 500hp@wheels on 93 octane.
Reply
Old Aug 20, 2012 | 01:33 PM
  #27  
B.J.@ToxicFab's Avatar
Account Disabled
iTrader: (26)
 
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 1,784
Likes: 1
From: Clinton, NJ - Myrtle Beach, SC
If you decide to go stock frame forward facing let me know sir & I will get you a quote! Collin's kit (02 dump/housing) is made to work with a stock location downpipe. I had a bad experience with an FP Red turbo so I switched to CBRD's BBK line. Had a BBK Full first & then upgraded to a BBK-B. BBK-B is definitely a fun street turbo, Chad keeps wanting me to send it back to upgrade it to the BB version but I am too lazy to pull it off. Our stock frame forward facing kit with a BB BBK-B or BBK-C would be a badass setup! Both of those turbos rock the anti-surg compressor housing & blue compressor wheel to go along with your car!
Reply
Old Aug 20, 2012 | 03:50 PM
  #28  
tony gibson's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 744
Likes: 0
From: NW FLORIDA
Originally Posted by High_PSI
Fine but you are giving up twin scroll which is a HUGE HUGE benefit. You are also giving up a stock frame turbo which keeps and Evo an evo verses some laggy car that makes power up top. I DD a Red and get boost in the 3000's on a street car with a Stock Bottom end. The way I see relevant turbos is this:

Stock IX Turbo
HKS Bolt On turbo for faster than stock spool and slightly more power.
BB GREEN-RED-BLACK. The last two are 9 second turbos PEOPLE the Green is an Easy ten Second turbo all with great spool and factory characteristics. The Black does begin however to show more on-off characteristics which is why I have the RED.
GT35R, spools later than a Black but is a tried and true monster
62- Variants, great but laggy but make BIG power if that is what you want.

The 40-42R series. Obviously top end monsters.

There are other stock Frame turbos but none that I personally like but if you do more power to you.

I too run a red and love the characteristics....BUT what about reliability? I have less than 20,000 miles on my red and it has about an 8th of an inch of in/out shaft play which suggests impending bearing failure...it hasnt failed yet and doesnt even smoke but I am holding my breath lol.
Reply
Old Aug 20, 2012 | 05:48 PM
  #29  
SmurfZilla's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (33)
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 5,313
Likes: 1
From: Raleigh, Transplanted from Toronto, Canada
I have a little bit of lag time Arcee so ill watch you build close.

Yet another suggestion I was given was upgrade the 6265 to 6266 and put a smaller housing on,it. Currently I'm 1.00 but it was suggested to go to .63.

I don't know if neutering this turbo is the answer though. I'd be lying if I didn't say the thought of a turbo from a known reputable manufac. In a orientation that hasn't been done yet (or that often) is intriguing.

Arrrghhhhh. Decisions decisions. I don't want to make the wrong one.
Reply
Old Aug 20, 2012 | 07:42 PM
  #30  
Anarchy99's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (196)
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 1,196
Likes: 0
From: Orlando/ Kissimmee
Originally Posted by SmurfZilla
I have a little bit of lag time Arcee so ill watch you build close.

Yet another suggestion I was given was upgrade the 6265 to 6266 and put a smaller housing on,it. Currently I'm 1.00 but it was suggested to go to .63.

I don't know if neutering this turbo is the answer though. I'd be lying if I didn't say the thought of a turbo from a known reputable manufac. In a orientation that hasn't been done yet (or that often) is intriguing.

Arrrghhhhh. Decisions decisions. I don't want to make the wrong one.
.63 is a single scroll A/R. So much misleading info being tossed around.

I would not go any smaller than you already have on a ts t3 housing
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 09:48 PM.