Notices
Evo Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain Everything from engine management to the best clutch and flywheel.

Carbon Fiber Goodness

Old Sep 3, 2012 | 08:33 PM
  #31  
03whitegsr's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 4,001
Likes: 17
From: Utah
Originally Posted by 94AWDcoupe
you been corrected on the torque at shaft. half power goes to front axles

now we need to work on that 8800 rpm shaft speed .. have you been drinking???
I disagree on 50% torque going to the rear. With a fully locked diff, the front tires will have less weight on them on a launch. If wheel speed is to remain the same, and 70% of the weight is on the rear tires in a launch, then ~70% of the torque is going to the rear. This isn't entirely true as grip vs. load isn't linear, but it is proportional.

Besides, the DSM guys have already blown up carbon driveshafts. They aren't unbreakable.


As for speed, have you been drinking?
25.3" tire diameter and 200mph
That is a tire speed of 2657 RPM
The rear diff is a 3.307:1 gear ratio, which means a driveshaft speed of 8787 RPM...

Originally Posted by masonh
the rear end only sees half the power.i believe EVO's are 50/50 split to the front/rear.therefore the drive shaft will only see half as well.

even if you make 1000ft-lb and you keep the 4.53 final drive you still won't test the limits of this drive shaft.i don't know the record torque for EVO's,but i'm sure it can't be more than 1000ft-lb.
The final drive ratio is not the rear diff ratio. The rear diff is 3.307:1. When you multiply in the transfer case ratio, it all works out though.


Again, though, I'm not saying this driveshaft isn't potentially awesome. It's just a long shaft and preventing vibration and resonance seems like it would be very difficult.

Last edited by 03whitegsr; Sep 3, 2012 at 08:46 PM.
Reply
Old Sep 3, 2012 | 09:52 PM
  #32  
masonh's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolving Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 445
Likes: 0
From: nashville
I disagree on 50% torque going to the rear. With a fully locked diff, the front tires will have less weight on them on a launch. If wheel speed is to remain the same, and 70% of the weight is on the rear tires in a launch, then ~70% of the torque is going to the rear. This isn't entirely true as grip vs. load isn't linear, but it is proportional.

Besides, the DSM guys have already blown up carbon driveshafts. They aren't unbreakable.


As for speed, have you been drinking?
25.3" tire diameter and 200mph
That is a tire speed of 2657 RPM
The rear diff is a 3.307:1 gear ratio, which means a driveshaft speed of 8787 RPM...


it's real simple;if you don't like carbon fiber drive shafts,then don't buy one.i started this thread b/c i thought some guys would be interested to see how much they weigh and how they fit and etc.

2800ft-lb driveshaft strength does not equal 700ft-lb at the crank,sorry.you can spin it anyway you want and you're still wrong.

start your own steel driveshaft thread and stop double posting your BS speculation in mine.
Reply
Old Sep 3, 2012 | 09:58 PM
  #33  
R/TErnie's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (32)
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 5,380
Likes: 6
From: WAR EAGLE!
Just so you know, you're talking to a guy with a MS in ME... so maybe you should take your quoted bull**** and try and pull it over someone elses head.

Last edited by R/TErnie; Sep 4, 2012 at 06:37 AM.
Reply
Old Sep 4, 2012 | 07:19 AM
  #34  
03whitegsr's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 4,001
Likes: 17
From: Utah
I've got nothing against the carbon shaft at all. I love the idea because it is light. I'm ALL FOR lightweight parts that work.

I just don't believe a company that says it has no shaft speed limits without some further explanation. Also, it seems like they made you believe it's unbreakable, when I can show you videos of carbon driveshafts blowing apart leaving shards of carbon stuck in the pavement.

How does being slightly more informed on the physical limitations of a design and asking for more data make me a bad person???

As for speculation, I'm not the one saying the final drive ratio is the same as the rear diff ratio...
Reply
Old Sep 4, 2012 | 09:37 AM
  #35  
masonh's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolving Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 445
Likes: 0
From: nashville
Just so you know, you're talking to a guy with a MS in ME... so maybe you should take your quoted bull**** and try and pull it over someone elses head.

well i guess he can't be wrong then.

so you agree that 700ft-lb crank translates to 2800ft-lb at the drive shaft?wow.

i'm not trying to pull anything over anyone.i just bought a drive shaft,started a thread for install pics,and you start saying it won't fit and frank says it isn't reasonable.

Also, it seems like they made you believe it's unbreakable,

how did you figure that,i never said anything like that.i said they tested it at 2800ft-lb and it help up fine.

you said,"700ft-lb at the crank is equal to 2800ft-lb at the driveshaft" and then myself and some other people disagreed because obviously the torque is split on the EVO since it's 4WD.

As for speculation, I'm not the one saying the final drive ratio is the same as the rear diff ratio..
id didn't say that either,maybe i mis-poke or you misunderstood,but the driveshaft is between the transfer case and the diff.the driveshaft powers the rear diff.the transmission final drive is 4.5.i would think the transmission has more effect on the DS than the rear diff.

so much for making a thread about my new drive shaft and the install.i still can't figure where all this animosity towards a drive shaft came from.do you guys have some experience with PST or something?

i'll just end this thread right here.this wasn't what i had in mind when i started the thread.

you guys can start a new thread about how weak the PST driveshaft is and how it doesn't fit and '03white's degrees in engineering.

Last edited by masonh; Sep 4, 2012 at 09:40 AM.
Reply
Old Sep 4, 2012 | 10:49 AM
  #36  
03whitegsr's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 4,001
Likes: 17
From: Utah
You are right...
You bought the greatest thing in the world and we should all marvel at it.

If you want to post pictures and have a circle jerk, put it in the show and shine section. If you want to show how to install it, maybe put it in the how-to section. If you want to discuse technical specifics of a part, maybe put it in the...oh, I don't know..."Evo Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain" section.

OH ****! That's where it is at...
It's the internet, expect people to post opinions about it.
Reply
Old Sep 4, 2012 | 11:47 AM
  #37  
masonh's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolving Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 445
Likes: 0
From: nashville
You are right...

i knew you'd figure it out.
Reply
Old Sep 4, 2012 | 06:53 PM
  #38  
R/TErnie's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (32)
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 5,380
Likes: 6
From: WAR EAGLE!
Originally Posted by 03whitegsr
You are right...
You bought the greatest thing in the world and we should all marvel at it.

If you want to post pictures and have a circle jerk, put it in the show and shine section. If you want to show how to install it, maybe put it in the how-to section. If you want to discuse technical specifics of a part, maybe put it in the...oh, I don't know..."Evo Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain" section.

OH ****! That's where it is at...
It's the internet, expect people to post opinions about it.
Haha. Spot on.
Reply
Old Sep 15, 2012 | 05:24 AM
  #39  
EvoLoverForever's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 491
Likes: 0
From: Utah
well, since op isnt posting pictures. for reference right???

Reply
Old Sep 15, 2012 | 05:43 AM
  #40  
SaulHudson's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 390
Likes: 0
From: Tokyo, Japan
Originally Posted by 94AWDcoupe
hope everyone realizes one piece shafts can only be used when engine and diff are using solid mounts. and i dont mean harder than stock mounts. they need to be locked down solid. only movement left for shaft to deal with would be chassis flex.
THIS. THIS!! Realize this.




Also, very curious if shaft is uni directional, which I doubt by maybe, or if it is cross plied and quasi isotropic.
What is the core made out of? Composite honeycomb??
Some graphite/epoxy structures can have tensile strengths of 300,000PSI, wouldn't be too concerned about breaking this due to torque if it was engineered....
Reply
Old Sep 15, 2012 | 05:45 AM
  #41  
SaulHudson's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 390
Likes: 0
From: Tokyo, Japan
Originally Posted by masonh
well i guess he can't be wrong then.

so you agree that 700ft-lb crank translates to 2800ft-lb at the drive shaft?wow.

i'm not trying to pull anything over anyone.i just bought a drive shaft,started a thread for install pics,and you start saying it won't fit and frank says it isn't reasonable.



Reply
Old Sep 15, 2012 | 08:48 AM
  #42  
MinusPrevious's Avatar
EvoM Staff Alumni
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 7,704
Likes: 1,387
From: So.Cal
Originally Posted by 94AWDcoupe
hope everyone realizes one piece shafts can only be used when engine and diff are using solid mounts. and i dont mean harder than stock mounts. they need to be locked down solid. only movement left for shaft to deal with would be chassis flex.
My concern is taking a 3 piece drive shaft system w/all the articulation points & converting to a 2 point single shaft

Mitsubishi designed the shaft system to be compliant w/ all the suspension & engine movement

Good thread topic
Reply
Old Sep 15, 2012 | 09:23 AM
  #43  
siemens03's Avatar
Newbie
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 32
Likes: 1
From: arkansas
Freaking awesome!
Reply
Old Sep 15, 2012 | 10:07 AM
  #44  
jezter101's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 208
Likes: 0
From: Behind Wheel
i'm keen to buy this, how's the install photos ?
Reply
Old Sep 15, 2012 | 12:07 PM
  #45  
wshihdnevo's Avatar
Evolved Member
15 Year Member
iTrader: (88)
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 2,765
Likes: 1
From: Tacoma
PHOTOS...?
Reply

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -7. The time now is 10:50 PM.