Notices
Evo Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain Everything from engine management to the best clutch and flywheel.

New Intercooler

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 10, 2004 | 06:33 AM
  #1  
evo8power's Avatar
Thread Starter
Account Disabled
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 483
Likes: 0
From: Downingtown, PA
Exclamation New Intercooler

was wondering if anyone knew if the grddy intercooler was any good and if i did the samco hoses with it woudl that help out my performance in any way??? thanks so much!
Reply
Old Feb 10, 2004 | 06:53 AM
  #2  
silverEVO8's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 2,659
Likes: 1
From: Utopia
Re: New Intercooler

Originally posted by evo8power
was wondering if anyone knew if the grddy intercooler was any good and if i did the samco hoses with it woudl that help out my performance in any way??? thanks so much!
Well, I sure hope it's agood product. I just ordered the GReddy R-SPL Intercooler Kit from Boost Solutions

FWIW, I saw the unit and it looks excellent. Very high quality finish and Greddy has an excellent reputation. Their Supra ICs are rumored to be the best flowing in the market. Also, that unit comes with all the piping.... Not a bad deal for the price & it's a direct bolt-on unit as well. The only drawback is how long it takes to get it here
Reply
Old Feb 10, 2004 | 09:31 AM
  #3  
AWDn0t2's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 11
Likes: 0
I dont know about the EVO kit, but the Greddy kit for the RX-7 sucked!

The good: Finish on the piping was polished
End tanks were nice.

The bad: The piping rubbed the hood no matter
how you adjusted it.
The core was a POS extruded tube and fin.

How much was the Greddy kit?
Reply
Old Feb 10, 2004 | 09:45 AM
  #4  
masterevo's Avatar
Evolved Member
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 646
Likes: 0
From: Houston
Maybe that cons wont be an issue with the evo8. I think the Greddy look really good. Greddy has really good reputation with turbo cars, so I dont doubt their performance nature. I'm going for a greddy IC too. So how much is the IC and the pipes? Greddy IC with Buschur turbo kits is a good combo? Peace...
Reply
Old Feb 10, 2004 | 10:16 AM
  #5  
silverEVO8's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 2,659
Likes: 1
From: Utopia
Originally posted by masterevo
Maybe that cons wont be an issue with the evo8. I think the Greddy look really good. Greddy has really good reputation with turbo cars, so I dont doubt their performance nature. I'm going for a greddy IC too. So how much is the IC and the pipes? Greddy IC with Buschur turbo kits is a good combo? Peace...
The GReddy R-SPL Intercooler Kit is priced at around $1180 and includes piping. The core appears to be made of tubes with fins, so if that is a pos, the IC is a pos The dimensions are a good bit larger than stock (of course) and the construction looks very good for flow purposes. The Bushchur IC looks pretty good except for the abrupt 90° bend at the inlet..... The Greddy is supposed to bolt on and fit...... There is a guy at Boost solutions who's got one already I'll ask around and see what if any issues he encounters with fit, function, etc.

Peace
Reply
Old Feb 10, 2004 | 11:11 AM
  #6  
propellerhead's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 1,394
Likes: 0
From: Agrestic
The abrupt 90° bend on the Buschur probably saves about 15" of tubing length as well as the need to do a 180° bend if the inlet was on the side of the end tank versus the back of it. Performancewise I'm guessing it's probably a breakeven between the two approaches.

For what it's worth the Buschur IC is of a bar and plate type of contruction versus tube and fin and is very well made. It has clean welds with no noticable spatter. It's a very heavy unit, probably weighing nearly twice as much as the stock unit but I can almost guarantee that it won't heat soak as quickly as the stocker will. Fitment was pretty much dead on. I did have to drill out the mounting holes to provide a bit more wiggle room to get the core level with the bumper. The undertray DOES need to be cut. Basically the new IC fills the recessed cavity that exists directly behind the front spoiler lip on the stock undertray. It's not a big deal. I've got a few pics after the surgery that I can post. When you include the upper IC piping you get a complete IC & hardpipe set for $1080.

Sorry for highjacking the thread...

evo8power: When you upgrade your IC you're going to see slightly increased boost lag (fractions of a second) due to the increased core volume that is inherent with most upgraded ICs.

Last edited by propellerhead; Feb 10, 2004 at 11:13 AM.
Reply
Old Feb 10, 2004 | 11:26 AM
  #7  
silverEVO8's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 2,659
Likes: 1
From: Utopia
Originally posted by propellerhead
The abrupt 90° bend on the Buschur probably saves about 15" of tubing length as well as the need to do a 180° bend if the inlet was on the side of the end tank versus the back of it. Performancewise I'm guessing it's probably a breakeven between the two approaches.
You might be right, but in my experience, the 180° tubes will flow infinitely better than any 90° abrupt, shap bend (by the way, the inlet pipe looks more like 120° than 180°). But anyway that might be academic because of other differences between the different IC's. I'm not sure what exactly the bar & plate is vs. the tube and fin. I see tubes and fins in every IC I've ever looked at so I'm prolly not sure of what the nomenclature really means. Here is a picture of the Greddy kit, maybe it can help to clarify matters somewhat.

Red letters are my edited correction, sorry for the confusion
Attached Images  

Last edited by silverEVO8; Feb 10, 2004 at 04:53 PM.
Reply
Old Feb 10, 2004 | 01:25 PM
  #8  
David Buschur's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (53)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 14,622
Likes: 32
A 180 degree bend flows better than any 90 degree bend?! That is almost funny. A 180 degree bend is TWO 90 degree bends isn't it? I guess that would make a 180 degree bend really flow for crap.

The less bends and length you have in your intercooler plumbing the better.

David Buschur
www.buschurracing.com
Reply
Old Feb 10, 2004 | 01:41 PM
  #9  
mifesto's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (58)
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 3,119
Likes: 0
From: Princeton, NJ
well i guess it depends on what they mean by 180 degrees... if its 180 in a very smooth fashion.. then yeah its good but if the 90 degrees is just as smooth turning then hey 90 always better. guess how sharp the turn is matters
Reply
Old Feb 10, 2004 | 01:42 PM
  #10  
propellerhead's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 1,394
Likes: 0
From: Agrestic
David: I think silverEVO8 may have been referring to the apparent abrupt direction change where the inlet meets the end tank.


silverEVO8: Check this out: http://www.bellintercoolers.com/Pages/tech.asp
Reply
Old Feb 10, 2004 | 02:15 PM
  #11  
David Buschur's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (53)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 14,622
Likes: 32
Not sure what was meant but I gaurantee that the lower i/c plumbing on our kit is optimal.

What you end up having is a mild bend leaving the turbo, this goes straight to the inlet to the FMIC. That inlet is a 4" radius mandrel bent 90 degree bend. This gets rid of the rediculous factory "road trip" routing that the other aftermarket manufacturers continue to follow.

I like our stuff, can you tell?! haha

David Buschur
www.buschurracing.com
Reply
Old Feb 10, 2004 | 04:46 PM
  #12  
silverEVO8's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 2,659
Likes: 1
From: Utopia
Originally posted by davidbuschur
A 180 degree bend flows better than any 90 degree bend?! That is almost funny. A 180 degree bend is TWO 90 degree bends isn't it? I guess that would make a 180 degree bend really flow for crap.

The less bends and length you have in your intercooler plumbing the better.

David Buschur
www.buschurracing.com
I guess I did not make myself very clear. What I meant was that an abrupt 90° sharp turn is not as good as a gradual curve. Generally the larger the bend radius, the better flow characteristics. At least this holds true for HVAC..... I've had to correct bad ducting before as the airflow through some dead-end and sharp turns in my house all but made the HVAC useless. Of course, YMMV, etc.
Reply
Old Feb 11, 2004 | 08:46 AM
  #13  
robi's Avatar
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (24)
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 1,614
Likes: 0
From: socal
Theory aside The BR FMIC on my car allows the car to spool = or better than stock and exhibits ZERO heat soak while beating my car within an inch of its life on the roadrace courses in AZ and CA... Just ask all the Z06s how I can pull them in the straight..."oh you the EVO with the BIG FMIC" USDM=Value per HP $ JDM=pretty and you may get the same HP... you'll just pay more for it (and wait 5-7 weeks in most cases) I have pieces from both markets and am happy with everything...But you can't beat Buschur's R&D.. (of 15 years with this motor). Anyone else notice that BR's staging allows every one of their parts to be integrated into the final goal of 400 to 450 WHP being used as a daily driver?
Reply
Old Feb 11, 2004 | 09:18 AM
  #14  
propellerhead's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 1,394
Likes: 0
From: Agrestic
Originally posted by robi
<snip>Anyone else notice that BR's staging allows every one of their parts to be integrated into the final goal of 400 to 450 WHP being used as a daily driver?
Yes, and I'm being sucked right into their marketing strategy!
Reply
Old Feb 11, 2004 | 11:01 AM
  #15  
AWDn0t2's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 11
Likes: 0
What's the deal with that little loop on the intercooler pipe on the top left?
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 07:13 PM.