Notices
Evo Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain Everything from engine management to the best clutch and flywheel.

6262 vs 6266 vs 6466

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 2, 2013 | 06:14 PM
  #31  
EvoDan2004's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (94)
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 8,984
Likes: 8
From: New Jersey
Originally Posted by car_nut15
Hmm this has got me thinking. I want my car to be really fun on the street... Its primarily street driven. What kind of power difference can be expected between the 6262 and 6266? Would 550whp be possible on the 6262 with pump gas??
depends on the rest of your setup. but a properly setup car i would say yes. 550 no problem.
Reply
Old May 2, 2013 | 06:57 PM
  #32  
car_nut15's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolving Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 338
Likes: 0
From: Toronto, Ontario
Originally Posted by evodan2004
depends on the rest of your setup. but a properly setup car i would say yes. 550 no problem.
Hmm ok. Some people were suggesting to go vband... Thats an extra $350 from ETS. Is it really worth the $$?
Reply
Old May 2, 2013 | 07:04 PM
  #33  
EvoDan2004's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (94)
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 8,984
Likes: 8
From: New Jersey
Originally Posted by car_nut15
Hmm ok. Some people were suggesting to go vband... Thats an extra $350 from ETS. Is it really worth the $$?
well its the new thing to do. it is also much lighter. so a lot less weight hanging on the front of the car and on the manifold its self. as for performance. i believe a few shops did some testing and saw no gain/no losses. just lighter, more compact and cleaner looking.
Reply
Old May 2, 2013 | 07:09 PM
  #34  
car_nut15's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolving Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 338
Likes: 0
From: Toronto, Ontario
Originally Posted by evodan2004
well its the new thing to do. it is also much lighter. so a lot less weight hanging on the front of the car and on the manifold its self. as for performance. i believe a few shops did some testing and saw no gain/no losses. just lighter, more compact and cleaner looking.

OK. I was thining for that price I could upgrade to TS for an extra $40. (Prices from ETS website) Regardless theres so many different options I dont know what to do now lol
Reply
Old May 2, 2013 | 07:13 PM
  #35  
EvoDan2004's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (94)
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 8,984
Likes: 8
From: New Jersey
Originally Posted by car_nut15
OK. I was thining for that price I could upgrade to TS for an extra $40. (Prices from ETS website) Regardless theres so many different options I dont know what to do now lol

if your willing to go TS do that. that is the best street option. if you want to avoid TS then go with a reg setup. V-Band or not it dont matter.
Reply
Old May 2, 2013 | 07:47 PM
  #36  
batty200's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 2,203
Likes: 5
The vband is the same basically as the newer ballistic housing's. They perform better than older t3 housing's. They are also lighter and much easier to install and remove. Fathouse Fab makes some badass vband kits too. Plus he is a great guy with a Beard!
Reply
Old May 2, 2013 | 08:11 PM
  #37  
spoolinx's Avatar
Newbie
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 86
Likes: 0
From: Twin Cities, MN
Should check this one out
https://www.evolutionm.net/forums/ev...omparison.html
Here is a good comparison
Reply
Old May 3, 2013 | 03:30 AM
  #38  
car_nut15's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolving Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 338
Likes: 0
From: Toronto, Ontario
I would like the spool of the 6262 but the top end of a 6266.... So I'm hoping I can accomplish that by going twin scroll 6266.
Reply
Old May 3, 2013 | 03:45 AM
  #39  
EvoDan2004's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (94)
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 8,984
Likes: 8
From: New Jersey
Originally Posted by car_nut15
I would like the spool of the 6262 but the top end of a 6266.... So I'm hoping I can accomplish that by going twin scroll 6266.
A TS 6266 will spool up a few 100 RPM quicker then a standard T3 6262.
Reply
Old May 3, 2013 | 01:33 PM
  #40  
car_nut15's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolving Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 338
Likes: 0
From: Toronto, Ontario
Ok so the twin scroll 6266 should be a t4 with a 1.15 housing?
Reply
Old May 3, 2013 | 07:03 PM
  #41  
EvoDan2004's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (94)
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 8,984
Likes: 8
From: New Jersey
Originally Posted by car_nut15
Ok so the twin scroll 6266 should be a t4 with a 1.15 housing?
Yes exactly. You can use the 1.32 but that's to big on a street car IMO
Reply
Old Sep 14, 2013 | 07:42 PM
  #42  
N33d4sp33d's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (31)
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 231
Likes: 0
From: NYC
Originally Posted by spoolinx
Should check this one out
https://www.evolutionm.net/forums/ev...omparison.html
Here is a good comparison
great info, I just bought an evo 8 gsr. Now it has 2.0L build currently running hta FP green and would like to get something bigger to make 650whp at low boost....I think the 6466BB is the way to go based on the videos...no such as Lag when you can downshift..
Reply
Old Sep 18, 2013 | 03:28 AM
  #43  
arkansasevo's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Sep 2013
Posts: 6
Likes: 1
From: Blytheville, AR
sounds awesome man, I got my car in the shop I went with a bb6266 on built 2.0 cant wait till its all done. I was stuck between the 6262 and 6266 but opted for the extra top end. Unfortunately where I live there is no e85 unless I drive a few hours so we are going for a pump gas and race gas setup only.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
litz4244
Evo Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain
1
Mar 17, 2017 11:19 AM
EVO 4 life
For Sale/WTB - Engine / Drivetrain / Power
0
Oct 28, 2015 07:59 AM
theblackbeast11
Evo X Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain
10
Mar 26, 2013 03:13 PM
eus_evo8MR
Evo Dyno Tuning / Results
12
Nov 25, 2012 09:24 PM
b16a95eg
Evo Dyno Tuning / Results
27
May 14, 2012 04:13 PM




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 11:48 AM.