Notices
Evo Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain Everything from engine management to the best clutch and flywheel.

Evo 9 problems

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 27, 2017, 11:35 PM
  #91  
Account Disabled
 
RightSaid fred's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: in a garage
Posts: 714
Received 22 Likes on 21 Posts
Insufficient clearance between top of valve guide and retainer at full lift?

Failure to measure properly when fitting the cams.

Yet another problem to eliminate.
Old Jul 28, 2017, 07:11 AM
  #92  
EvoM Guru
iTrader: (1)
 
LetsGetThisDone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 15,756
Received 1,543 Likes on 1,322 Posts
Originally Posted by familymr
Why move the power band up further in the rpm range on a stock turbo car. I've had stock 9 turbo cars with the s1 cams do low 500 dynojet with a good power band
You mean low 400 maybe?
Old Jul 28, 2017, 07:30 AM
  #93  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (1)
 
2006EvoIXer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: California
Posts: 3,294
Received 194 Likes on 182 Posts
From what I read, low end power difference isn't very noticeable. And the hta71 is so affordable that anyone can buy one. I'm just helping him to avoid paying again to upgrade to S2.


Originally Posted by familymr
Why move the power band up further in the rpm range on a stock turbo car. I've had stock 9 turbo cars with the s1 cams do low 500 dynojet with a good power band
Old Jul 28, 2017, 07:33 AM
  #94  
EvoM Guru
iTrader: (1)
 
LetsGetThisDone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 15,756
Received 1,543 Likes on 1,322 Posts
Nothing wrong with S1's. They make a little more torque, power up top on small turbo's is good to about 500whp before the S2's will start making significant gains. And for a car that is just street driven, the much smoother idle of the S1's gets the nod.
Old Jul 28, 2017, 07:35 AM
  #95  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (1)
 
2006EvoIXer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: California
Posts: 3,294
Received 194 Likes on 182 Posts
I thought the stock 9 would be plenty enough for me when I traded my modded wrx in. My 9 didn't last 2,000 miles before I added some power mods. Lol
If you're already getting beehive upgrades, it makes more sense to me to get S2 so that when you upgrade your turbo, you don't have to upgrade cams again. Talk to those that went through S1 and S2.

Originally Posted by KYjerry414
I'm mentioned it to FamilyMr and I agree with him that the S1 would be plenty enough. Don't the S2 cams have more lift on them? I really don't plan on doing nothing major like a turbo upgrade or a built block.
Old Jul 28, 2017, 07:37 AM
  #96  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (1)
 
2006EvoIXer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: California
Posts: 3,294
Received 194 Likes on 182 Posts
Originally Posted by letsgetthisdone
You mean low 400 maybe?
I think he was trying to say the S1 is good to 500whp.
Old Jul 28, 2017, 08:20 AM
  #97  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (1)
 
2006EvoIXer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: California
Posts: 3,294
Received 194 Likes on 182 Posts
Originally Posted by KYjerry414
I'm mentioned it to FamilyMr and I agree with him that the S1 would be plenty enough. Don't the S2 cams have more lift on them? I really don't plan on doing nothing major like a turbo upgrade or a built block.
I searched for more info on differences and these are what i found. S2 has more lift, especially the exhaust side.




Stock vs S1 vs S2

Strange that S2 looks like it makes power faster than S1 as turbo is spooling up. Could be a glitch.

Last edited by 2006EvoIXer; Jul 28, 2017 at 08:26 AM.
Old Jul 28, 2017, 08:47 AM
  #98  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (1)
 
2006EvoIXer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: California
Posts: 3,294
Received 194 Likes on 182 Posts
From reading further, the MIVEC will help with the low end difference. Idle is definitely smoother with S1.
For me, I didn't add cams because I chose the hta71 upgrade over cams, so until I build up my reserves, I'll most likely get the S2 with beehive springs and retainers. On E85, 1st gear acceleration is at traction limits of my tires, so I don't see the benefits of S1. Normal freeway driving will be nicer on S1 for ease of passing, but there should be plenty of power on S2. Both are great sets if cams, so you can't go wrong either way.
Old Jul 28, 2017, 09:23 AM
  #99  
Evolved Member
 
kikiturbo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Croatia
Posts: 2,026
Received 269 Likes on 207 Posts
we have super smooth, 950 RPM @ 14.7 AFR idle with S2 cams on E9...
Old Jul 28, 2017, 12:23 PM
  #100  
kaj
EvoM Community Team Leader
iTrader: (60)
 
kaj's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Fresno, CA
Posts: 13,620
Received 813 Likes on 678 Posts
Originally Posted by 2006EvoIXer
I thought the stock 9 would be plenty enough for me when I traded my modded wrx in. My 9 didn't last 2,000 miles before I added some power mods. Lol
If you're already getting beehive upgrades, it makes more sense to me to get S2 so that when you upgrade your turbo, you don't have to upgrade cams again. Talk to those that went through S1 and S2.
everyone says they well upgrade but often don't. Then they are stuck with a setup that is less than optimal. I can count, on one hand, the number of people I know (personally) that make over 500whp.

Originally Posted by 2006EvoIXer
I think he was trying to say the S1 is good to 500whp.
Not on a stock turbo, they aren't.
Old Jul 28, 2017, 12:28 PM
  #101  
EvoM Guru
iTrader: (1)
 
LetsGetThisDone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 15,756
Received 1,543 Likes on 1,322 Posts
Originally Posted by kaj
Not on a stock turbo, they aren't.

Exactly...lol.
Old Jul 28, 2017, 01:24 PM
  #102  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (1)
 
2006EvoIXer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: California
Posts: 3,294
Received 194 Likes on 182 Posts
Originally Posted by kaj
Not on a stock turbo, they aren't.
I think he was saying it's good for 500whp *and won't need it on stock turbo.*

Last edited by 2006EvoIXer; Jul 28, 2017 at 01:38 PM.
Old Jul 28, 2017, 01:47 PM
  #103  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (1)
 
2006EvoIXer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: California
Posts: 3,294
Received 194 Likes on 182 Posts
Originally Posted by kikiturbo
we have super smooth, 950 RPM @ 14.7 AFR idle with S2 cams on E9...
So idle depends on how creative the tuner is. I like them even more!
Old Jul 28, 2017, 02:01 PM
  #104  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (1)
 
2006EvoIXer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: California
Posts: 3,294
Received 194 Likes on 182 Posts
From the chart above, it looks like S1 makes about 20 whp more power 3600-4800 rpm. S2 makes about 30-38 whp more 5500+ rpms. I wonder if this is on stock 9 turbo.
Old Jul 28, 2017, 02:08 PM
  #105  
kaj
EvoM Community Team Leader
iTrader: (60)
 
kaj's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Fresno, CA
Posts: 13,620
Received 813 Likes on 678 Posts
Originally Posted by 2006EvoIXer
I think he was saying it's good for 500whp *and won't need it on stock turbo.*
Not what he posted.

" I've had stock 9 turbo cars with the s1 cams do low 500 dynojet with a good power band"


Quick Reply: Evo 9 problems



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 06:13 AM.