Full Intercooler piping around $300
I would think that heat being transferred from the engine compartment through the intercooler pipes via convection is negligible, even when the engine bay is warmed up and at a steady state temperature. Intake air temperature should be most affected by intercooler efficiency. But I do notice that my car feels faster if I go WOT before the engine bay warms up.
As a test, someone should do some air temperature measurements at the intercooler outlet, throttle body, and another point somewhere around the BOV discharge tube under the following driving conditions:
1) cool engine bay, 3rd gear pull from 2k to redline, SS ic pipes
2) warm engine bay, 3rd gear pull from 2k to redline, SS ic pipes
3) cool engine bay, 3rd gear pull from 2k to redline, AL ic pipes
4) warm engine bay, 3rd gear pull from 2k to redline, AL ic pipes
To limit the # of variables, we should keep the same intercooler and relatively similar pipe routing to have the same piping surface area, and try to do all tests under the same conditions.
As a test, someone should do some air temperature measurements at the intercooler outlet, throttle body, and another point somewhere around the BOV discharge tube under the following driving conditions:
1) cool engine bay, 3rd gear pull from 2k to redline, SS ic pipes
2) warm engine bay, 3rd gear pull from 2k to redline, SS ic pipes
3) cool engine bay, 3rd gear pull from 2k to redline, AL ic pipes
4) warm engine bay, 3rd gear pull from 2k to redline, AL ic pipes
To limit the # of variables, we should keep the same intercooler and relatively similar pipe routing to have the same piping surface area, and try to do all tests under the same conditions.
Regarding my comment about my car feeling faster w/ a cooler engine bay, I just remembered that our ECUs give less timing w/ higher intake air temps and coolant temps as a safeguard. That’s probably what causes the power difference.
Originally Posted by marksae
I would think that heat being transferred from the engine compartment through the intercooler pipes via convection is negligible, even when the engine bay is warmed up and at a steady state temperature.
However, I agree with your thoughts on doing a comprehensive test. Yet I won't be the one to do it, I don't have the desire, I'll simply buy AL pipes and go with my instincts and what all of my education has taught me.
- Steve
PS, yeah, I want to see pics masterevo, but I in no way think analyzing a difference like this is "nonsense"
I'm sure a lot of people wonder about this "nonsense". This type of information would be just as beneficial to know as whether X brand's exhaust generates more power over Y's brand exhaust.
I just ran a quick calculation to see what the air velocity is relative to flow rate going through a 2.5" O.D. pipe w/ .060" wall thickness.
Air velocity = Flow rate / Area
Flow Air Velocity
(CFM) (ft/s)
250 134.9
275 148.4
300 161.8
325 175.3
350 188.8
375 202.3
400 215.8
425 229.3
450 242.8
475 256.2
500 269.7
525 283.2
550 296.7
575 310.2
600 323.7
Under boost, air moves pretty fast. It doesn't seem like all that much heat would get transferred from the pipes to the air at these speeds. I would guess that the friction the air generates while going through the pipes at these velocities would heat up the pipes more.
*EDIT*
Corrected the air velocity values. I used diameter instead of radius when calculating area.
I just ran a quick calculation to see what the air velocity is relative to flow rate going through a 2.5" O.D. pipe w/ .060" wall thickness.
Air velocity = Flow rate / Area
Flow Air Velocity
(CFM) (ft/s)
250 134.9
275 148.4
300 161.8
325 175.3
350 188.8
375 202.3
400 215.8
425 229.3
450 242.8
475 256.2
500 269.7
525 283.2
550 296.7
575 310.2
600 323.7
Under boost, air moves pretty fast. It doesn't seem like all that much heat would get transferred from the pipes to the air at these speeds. I would guess that the friction the air generates while going through the pipes at these velocities would heat up the pipes more.
*EDIT*
Corrected the air velocity values. I used diameter instead of radius when calculating area.
Last edited by marksae; Jul 29, 2004 at 10:41 AM.
Originally Posted by marksae
I'm sure a lot of people wonder about this "nonsense". This type of information would be just as beneficial to know as whether X brand's exhaust generates more power over Y's brand exhaust.
I just ran a quick calculation to see what the air velocity is relative to flow rate going through a 2.5" O.D. pipe w/ .060" wall thickness.
Air velocity = Flow rate / Area
Flow Air Velocity
(CFM) (ft/s)
250 33.7
275 37.1
300 40.5
325 43.8
350 47.2
375 50.6
400 53.9
425 57.3
450 60.7
475 64.1
500 67.4
525 70.8
550 74.2
575 77.5
600 80.9
Under boost, air moves pretty fast. It doesn't seem like all that much heat would get transferred from the pipes to the air at these speeds. I would guess that the friction the air generates while going through the pipes at these velocities would heat up the pipes more.
I just ran a quick calculation to see what the air velocity is relative to flow rate going through a 2.5" O.D. pipe w/ .060" wall thickness.
Air velocity = Flow rate / Area
Flow Air Velocity
(CFM) (ft/s)
250 33.7
275 37.1
300 40.5
325 43.8
350 47.2
375 50.6
400 53.9
425 57.3
450 60.7
475 64.1
500 67.4
525 70.8
550 74.2
575 77.5
600 80.9
Under boost, air moves pretty fast. It doesn't seem like all that much heat would get transferred from the pipes to the air at these speeds. I would guess that the friction the air generates while going through the pipes at these velocities would heat up the pipes more.
Hope this makes sense

- Steve



I'm gunna take that as a compliment