side impact airbags for '05 Evo VIII
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (3)
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 1,179
Likes: 0
From: Livermore, CA
Originally Posted by chrisw
what ever.... I personally hate airbags. It's something about having the equivelent of an M-80 sitting in front of me that I dislike. With side air bags, they sit right about kidney level...
Originally Posted by chrisw
I would rather see Mitsubishi strength the side pillars (and further increase the structural ridgity of the car) instead of caving into more air bags...
Originally Posted by chrisw
Also to help prevent accidents where airbags are nessesary, better driver education would be nice. The best way to get rid of the need for the air bag is to learn how to better avoid the accident...
Originally Posted by chrisw
In the mean time, if mitsubishi doesn't have the safety features you feel you need, have fun with your subaru. 
Originally Posted by Steiner
Seat mounted side impact airbags don't explode like an M-80 into your kidneys. They explode outwards, not inwards. They cushion an impact, hence the name. They don't actually create an impact with your kidneys.
Airbags are notorious for compound fractures in the wrist and or thumbs.
If you have an accident that is slow enough to barely need an airbag do you think those types of injuries are justified? how about all the children and smallish individuals who have been killed becuase of airbags going off in sub-40 mph accidents?
I would like to see them do both. And trust me, they will eventually offer side airbags on the Evo. The only question is when. Would you like me to post a few links to some of the tests the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety has done?
Imagine driving down a 45mph road at about 52mph when, from about 50 yards away, you suddenly see a full size pickup truck coming your direction from the opposite way and starting to make a turn, from your left to your right, directly in front of you. Do you speed up to avoid him or slam on the brakes and brace yourself for a t-bone impact? I slammed on the brakes, then so did the truck...right in the middle of the road...so I swerved hard to the right to avoid a head on collision that my '02 Nissan Spec V and me would have lost. The truck's bumper pounded into the driver side of the car and spun the vehicle around twice. I was lucky there was no secondary collision. The car was totalled but I walked away with only some minor cuts and bruises. That car had side airbags. Without them the paramedics said I would have sustained serious abdominal, head, and neck injuries. That's a fancy way of saying I would have been dead or a vegatable. Which Skip Barber school of driving teaches you how to prepare for the unexpected?
I'll have fun in either car. I just want to be as safe as possible. Now let the adults talk.
Let me ask you a couple of questions
1) what are the three stages of an accident?
2) out of those three stages, which causes the most damage to a occupant?
3) After you correctly answer question #2 Which safety devices would prevent most of the damage (to the occcupant) incurred in an accident? A safty harness or airbag?
Last edited by chrisw; Oct 28, 2004 at 08:49 PM.
Originally Posted by metaphysical
If you want to be really safe put a roll-cage in with a Recaro racing seat and a 5-point harness.
Problem is that john q. public doesn't want to. I car pooled with some one who never properly used his seat belt because he was more concerned about getting wrinkles in his shirt...
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (3)
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 1,179
Likes: 0
From: Livermore, CA
Originally Posted by chrisw
murphys law, anything can happen.
Airbags are notorious for compound fractures in the wrist and or thumbs.
If you have an accident that is slow enough to barely need an airbag do you think those types of injuries are justified? how about all the children and smallish individuals who have been killed becuase of airbags going off in sub-40 mph accidents?
I have read those links before. Problem is they don't test the alternatives to airbags for comparison.
Been there done that.... I put a car (a SAAB 99) into a tree (head on) at aproximatly 45mph. I was dumb enough not to be wearing a seat belt, so I bounced off the dash, bent the steering wheel over the dash, pretty nasty accident. I walked away with no cuts, no buises, no concussion... It all depends on the car you drive.
Let me ask you a couple of questions
1) what are the three stages of an accident?
2) out of those three stages, which causes the most damage to a occupant?
3) After you correctly answer question #2 Which safety devices would prevent most of the damage (to the occcupant) incurred in an accident? A safty harness or airbag?
Airbags are notorious for compound fractures in the wrist and or thumbs.
If you have an accident that is slow enough to barely need an airbag do you think those types of injuries are justified? how about all the children and smallish individuals who have been killed becuase of airbags going off in sub-40 mph accidents?
I have read those links before. Problem is they don't test the alternatives to airbags for comparison.
Been there done that.... I put a car (a SAAB 99) into a tree (head on) at aproximatly 45mph. I was dumb enough not to be wearing a seat belt, so I bounced off the dash, bent the steering wheel over the dash, pretty nasty accident. I walked away with no cuts, no buises, no concussion... It all depends on the car you drive.
Let me ask you a couple of questions
1) what are the three stages of an accident?
2) out of those three stages, which causes the most damage to a occupant?
3) After you correctly answer question #2 Which safety devices would prevent most of the damage (to the occcupant) incurred in an accident? A safty harness or airbag?
Last edited by Steiner; Oct 28, 2004 at 10:21 PM.
No worries... sorry if I offended you.
But your faith in air bags is misplaced.
If you answer those question I asked, you would eventually figure it out for yourself.
Airbags are a bandaid solution. the key to preventing injuries in an accident is to prevent the occupant from moving. You see almost every weekend on Speedvision every weekend.
The lame 3 point belts they (the lazy car companies) don't hold you in place. Further more, they (the car companies) don't want to make you really strap in less they scare away the customer.
Airbags avoid that whole issue by hiding the percieved safety feature behind an explosive ballon....
I am against that. Driving is inherintly dangerous. I see it everyday on that F*** road (rt 17). People like john Q. Stupid, need to be reminded that driving is dangerous. People would definately get a clue faster if they had to properly strap in, don't you think?
I think it's irresponsible of the car companies to put their faith in yet-another-airbag solution when there is hard scientific evidence that gives them the real answer...
But your faith in air bags is misplaced.
If you answer those question I asked, you would eventually figure it out for yourself.
Airbags are a bandaid solution. the key to preventing injuries in an accident is to prevent the occupant from moving. You see almost every weekend on Speedvision every weekend.
The lame 3 point belts they (the lazy car companies) don't hold you in place. Further more, they (the car companies) don't want to make you really strap in less they scare away the customer.
Airbags avoid that whole issue by hiding the percieved safety feature behind an explosive ballon....
I am against that. Driving is inherintly dangerous. I see it everyday on that F*** road (rt 17). People like john Q. Stupid, need to be reminded that driving is dangerous. People would definately get a clue faster if they had to properly strap in, don't you think?
I think it's irresponsible of the car companies to put their faith in yet-another-airbag solution when there is hard scientific evidence that gives them the real answer...
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (3)
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 1,179
Likes: 0
From: Livermore, CA
Originally Posted by chrisw
No worries... sorry if I offended you.
But your faith in air bags is misplaced.
If you answer those question I asked, you would eventually figure it out for yourself.
Airbags are a bandaid solution. the key to preventing injuries in an accident is to prevent the occupant from moving. You see almost every weekend on Speedvision every weekend.
The lame 3 point belts they (the lazy car companies) don't hold you in place. Further more, they (the car companies) don't want to make you really strap in less they scare away the customer.
Airbags avoid that whole issue by hiding the percieved safety feature behind an explosive ballon....
I am against that. Driving is inherintly dangerous. I see it everyday on that F*** road (rt 17). People like john Q. Stupid, need to be reminded that driving is dangerous. People would definately get a clue faster if they had to properly strap in, don't you think?
I think it's irresponsible of the car companies to put their faith in yet-another-airbag solution when there is hard scientific evidence that gives them the real answer...
But your faith in air bags is misplaced.
If you answer those question I asked, you would eventually figure it out for yourself.
Airbags are a bandaid solution. the key to preventing injuries in an accident is to prevent the occupant from moving. You see almost every weekend on Speedvision every weekend.
The lame 3 point belts they (the lazy car companies) don't hold you in place. Further more, they (the car companies) don't want to make you really strap in less they scare away the customer.
Airbags avoid that whole issue by hiding the percieved safety feature behind an explosive ballon....
I am against that. Driving is inherintly dangerous. I see it everyday on that F*** road (rt 17). People like john Q. Stupid, need to be reminded that driving is dangerous. People would definately get a clue faster if they had to properly strap in, don't you think?
I think it's irresponsible of the car companies to put their faith in yet-another-airbag solution when there is hard scientific evidence that gives them the real answer...
Steiner, I agree with you completely, side air bags are a must. When the salesman at the Mistubishi dealership nearest me couldn't find the car I wanted with side air bags, I didn't even bother trying to negotiate with them. They're a $100 option in my car, I mean why the hell would anyone buying it not get them?
Chrisw, I suppose your argument has some sense...in a hypothetical world that doesn't have any accidents. Back in the real world, accidents do happen, and side air bags are a great safety mechanism that will do a much better job of protecting you than an ideology will. Yes, airbags can and sometimes do harm people, but most of the time they do _much_ more good than harm.
How about an example...ideally and according to your philosophy, people should be educated not to steal things. Do you leave your house unlocked when you're away? Or let's take the bandaids you mentioned. Do you not use them because they're just a temporary way to stop a wound from bleeding?
Don't get me wrong, I definately think a lot of drivers out there need some more education on the subject. That even includes myself...normally I'm a resonably safe (if faster than average
) driver, but I'll admit to doing some really dumb things because of getting angry at traffic in general or a particular driver. Driving angry can be almost as bad as drunk driving
Chrisw, I suppose your argument has some sense...in a hypothetical world that doesn't have any accidents. Back in the real world, accidents do happen, and side air bags are a great safety mechanism that will do a much better job of protecting you than an ideology will. Yes, airbags can and sometimes do harm people, but most of the time they do _much_ more good than harm.
How about an example...ideally and according to your philosophy, people should be educated not to steal things. Do you leave your house unlocked when you're away? Or let's take the bandaids you mentioned. Do you not use them because they're just a temporary way to stop a wound from bleeding?
Don't get me wrong, I definately think a lot of drivers out there need some more education on the subject. That even includes myself...normally I'm a resonably safe (if faster than average
) driver, but I'll admit to doing some really dumb things because of getting angry at traffic in general or a particular driver. Driving angry can be almost as bad as drunk driving
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
EvolutionIXMR06
EvoM New Member / FAQs / EvoM Rules
4
Dec 12, 2013 05:31 PM




