Evo MR pwns porta potty
Originally Posted by purecoda
if you want to have some REAL fun, open the link in a few new windows about a second apart each and you can get this guy singing in a round!


good thinking, but that will only cause accidents.
Originally Posted by dizzigital
Look, I'm more concerned with the safety stewards or operating people NOT turning people away who had r-compounds. I hold to the belief that r-compounds shouldn't be used when the HIGHS for the day/week/month are 55-60 degrees on one or two days. There are people that says it's fine... I've heard from different people saying it's not. It comes down to what we were brought up to beleive and that's something we'll have to agree to disagree on.
All it takes is one simple mistake and it's gonesville. The best auto-xers in the country many times still make mistakes while running a course. I'm not holding anything like that aginst you. Given the conditions... a small mistake off the 'line' and it's bigger consequenses when there's sand/snow on the ground than if it were an 70-80 degree day and the lots been used for the past couple months to scrub sand/snow off of it.
Many times you said you shouldn't have run them, and you knew it. Not being able to put yourself in check when it's called for is one of the biggest causes of accidents because the driver is overconfident in their abilities.. not seeing the whole picture. I do it too. You're not alone in this. However, what's gotten me really irritated is your attitude here on evo m acting like a little kid because people critisized your choice in tire for the day. Critisism is GOOD... *if* you learn from it. When there's many people saying it was a dumb move... because it was YOU... you're not seeing it. It's like 'love is blind'. Do you understand that?
Sometimes drivers need to take a step back and evaluate things instead of saying 'well if 10 others said it's ok, then it's got to be ok'. (Not realizing those 10 others probably have a few more years of auto-x experience on r-compounds.) Well there are more than 10 people telling you it wasn't ok here on this forum... if you listened to your ten... why are you discounting us? Afterall... you go with the majority, right?
Again... I have more critisism for the event runners than you.
Brennen.... It was raining heavily and it was in the 40-50s. You're right. When I say you 'shouldn't' run them in the rain or in the cold.. to me 'shouldn't' means you're not doing any good and they're not going to grip (set-up choice). Even you said you switched to your streets and had more grip... and more grip means what? More control.
Also... Gwinnett had:
1) Less curbs to hit
2) Was set up as a national event with natioanl caliber drivers running in it (ie: expereince in the rain)
3) Less lightpoles
4) There wasn't any snow on the ground... just off the dry line.
Factor those four things in, then look at the event at the Ball Park and ask if the two venues were alike.
--kC
All it takes is one simple mistake and it's gonesville. The best auto-xers in the country many times still make mistakes while running a course. I'm not holding anything like that aginst you. Given the conditions... a small mistake off the 'line' and it's bigger consequenses when there's sand/snow on the ground than if it were an 70-80 degree day and the lots been used for the past couple months to scrub sand/snow off of it.
Many times you said you shouldn't have run them, and you knew it. Not being able to put yourself in check when it's called for is one of the biggest causes of accidents because the driver is overconfident in their abilities.. not seeing the whole picture. I do it too. You're not alone in this. However, what's gotten me really irritated is your attitude here on evo m acting like a little kid because people critisized your choice in tire for the day. Critisism is GOOD... *if* you learn from it. When there's many people saying it was a dumb move... because it was YOU... you're not seeing it. It's like 'love is blind'. Do you understand that?

Sometimes drivers need to take a step back and evaluate things instead of saying 'well if 10 others said it's ok, then it's got to be ok'. (Not realizing those 10 others probably have a few more years of auto-x experience on r-compounds.) Well there are more than 10 people telling you it wasn't ok here on this forum... if you listened to your ten... why are you discounting us? Afterall... you go with the majority, right?

Again... I have more critisism for the event runners than you.
Brennen.... It was raining heavily and it was in the 40-50s. You're right. When I say you 'shouldn't' run them in the rain or in the cold.. to me 'shouldn't' means you're not doing any good and they're not going to grip (set-up choice). Even you said you switched to your streets and had more grip... and more grip means what? More control.

Also... Gwinnett had:
1) Less curbs to hit
2) Was set up as a national event with natioanl caliber drivers running in it (ie: expereince in the rain)
3) Less lightpoles
4) There wasn't any snow on the ground... just off the dry line.
Factor those four things in, then look at the event at the Ball Park and ask if the two venues were alike.
--kC
I have never heard anyone say "I was in an accident because I was going to slow or that I was being too careful." Too fast not careful enough - and hopefully lessons learned.
Well flame levels and event arrangers wishing this would go away aside, if:
1. "Johnny" is OK and the worst he has is a really funny story for the pub.
2. Everyone involved in the event and everyone in contact with this thread leaves having learned from the experience to make tomorrow better.
Then all is not lost.
Well flame levels and event arrangers wishing this would go away aside, if:
1. "Johnny" is OK and the worst he has is a really funny story for the pub.
2. Everyone involved in the event and everyone in contact with this thread leaves having learned from the experience to make tomorrow better.
Then all is not lost.
Originally Posted by twinevo
well, i'm not too worried about the evo owner. if the potty was occupied then I'd be more worried for that person-although i'm sure this person will get a nice injury lawyer and make a few bucks on the ordeal.
Originally Posted by KC
Look, I'm more concerned with the safety stewards or operating people NOT turning people away who had r-compounds. I hold to the belief that r-compounds shouldn't be used when the HIGHS for the day/week/month are 55-60 degrees on one or two days. There are people that says it's fine... I've heard from different people saying it's not. It comes down to what we were brought up to beleive and that's something we'll have to agree to disagree on.
All it takes is one simple mistake and it's gonesville. The best auto-xers in the country many times still make mistakes while running a course. I'm not holding anything like that aginst you. Given the conditions... a small mistake off the 'line' and it's bigger consequenses when there's sand/snow on the ground than if it were an 70-80 degree day and the lots been used for the past couple months to scrub sand/snow off of it.
Many times you said you shouldn't have run them, and you knew it. Not being able to put yourself in check when it's called for is one of the biggest causes of accidents because the driver is overconfident in their abilities.. not seeing the whole picture. I do it too. You're not alone in this. However, what's gotten me really irritated is your attitude here on evo m acting like a little kid because people critisized your choice in tire for the day. Critisism is GOOD... *if* you learn from it. When there's many people saying it was a dumb move... because it was YOU... you're not seeing it. It's like 'love is blind'. Do you understand that?
Sometimes drivers need to take a step back and evaluate things instead of saying 'well if 10 others said it's ok, then it's got to be ok'. (Not realizing those 10 others probably have a few more years of auto-x experience on r-compounds.) Well there are more than 10 people telling you it wasn't ok here on this forum... if you listened to your ten... why are you discounting us? Afterall... you go with the majority, right?
Again... I have more critisism for the event runners than you.
Brennen.... It was raining heavily and it was in the 40-50s. You're right. When I say you 'shouldn't' run them in the rain or in the cold.. to me 'shouldn't' means you're not doing any good and they're not going to grip (set-up choice). Even you said you switched to your streets and had more grip... and more grip means what? More control.
Also... Gwinnett had:
1) Less curbs to hit
2) Was set up as a national event with natioanl caliber drivers running in it (ie: expereince in the rain)
3) Less lightpoles
4) There wasn't any snow on the ground... just off the dry line.
Factor those four things in, then look at the event at the Ball Park and ask if the two venues were alike.
--kC
All it takes is one simple mistake and it's gonesville. The best auto-xers in the country many times still make mistakes while running a course. I'm not holding anything like that aginst you. Given the conditions... a small mistake off the 'line' and it's bigger consequenses when there's sand/snow on the ground than if it were an 70-80 degree day and the lots been used for the past couple months to scrub sand/snow off of it.
Many times you said you shouldn't have run them, and you knew it. Not being able to put yourself in check when it's called for is one of the biggest causes of accidents because the driver is overconfident in their abilities.. not seeing the whole picture. I do it too. You're not alone in this. However, what's gotten me really irritated is your attitude here on evo m acting like a little kid because people critisized your choice in tire for the day. Critisism is GOOD... *if* you learn from it. When there's many people saying it was a dumb move... because it was YOU... you're not seeing it. It's like 'love is blind'. Do you understand that?

Sometimes drivers need to take a step back and evaluate things instead of saying 'well if 10 others said it's ok, then it's got to be ok'. (Not realizing those 10 others probably have a few more years of auto-x experience on r-compounds.) Well there are more than 10 people telling you it wasn't ok here on this forum... if you listened to your ten... why are you discounting us? Afterall... you go with the majority, right?

Again... I have more critisism for the event runners than you.
Brennen.... It was raining heavily and it was in the 40-50s. You're right. When I say you 'shouldn't' run them in the rain or in the cold.. to me 'shouldn't' means you're not doing any good and they're not going to grip (set-up choice). Even you said you switched to your streets and had more grip... and more grip means what? More control.

Also... Gwinnett had:
1) Less curbs to hit
2) Was set up as a national event with natioanl caliber drivers running in it (ie: expereince in the rain)
3) Less lightpoles
4) There wasn't any snow on the ground... just off the dry line.
Factor those four things in, then look at the event at the Ball Park and ask if the two venues were alike.
--kC
Originally Posted by Fast Shadow
You mean it was doing very well up to the point where it jumped the curb and struck a bystander.
Originally Posted by KC
Look, I'm more concerned with the safety stewards or operating people NOT turning people away who had r-compounds. I hold to the belief that r-compounds shouldn't be used when the HIGHS for the day/week/month are 55-60 degrees on one or two days. There are people that says it's fine... I've heard from different people saying it's not. It comes down to what we were brought up to beleive and that's something we'll have to agree to disagree on.
All it takes is one simple mistake and it's gonesville. The best auto-xers in the country many times still make mistakes while running a course. I'm not holding anything like that aginst you. Given the conditions... a small mistake off the 'line' and it's bigger consequenses when there's sand/snow on the ground than if it were an 70-80 degree day and the lots been used for the past couple months to scrub sand/snow off of it.
Many times you said you shouldn't have run them, and you knew it. Not being able to put yourself in check when it's called for is one of the biggest causes of accidents because the driver is overconfident in their abilities.. not seeing the whole picture. I do it too. You're not alone in this. However, what's gotten me really irritated is your attitude here on evo m acting like a little kid because people critisized your choice in tire for the day. Critisism is GOOD... *if* you learn from it. When there's many people saying it was a dumb move... because it was YOU... you're not seeing it. It's like 'love is blind'. Do you understand that?
Sometimes drivers need to take a step back and evaluate things instead of saying 'well if 10 others said it's ok, then it's got to be ok'. (Not realizing those 10 others probably have a few more years of auto-x experience on r-compounds.) Well there are more than 10 people telling you it wasn't ok here on this forum... if you listened to your ten... why are you discounting us? Afterall... you go with the majority, right?
Again... I have more critisism for the event runners than you.
Brennen.... It was raining heavily and it was in the 40-50s. You're right. When I say you 'shouldn't' run them in the rain or in the cold.. to me 'shouldn't' means you're not doing any good and they're not going to grip (set-up choice). Even you said you switched to your streets and had more grip... and more grip means what? More control.
Also... Gwinnett had:
1) Less curbs to hit
2) Was set up as a national event with natioanl caliber drivers running in it (ie: expereince in the rain)
3) Less lightpoles
4) There wasn't any snow on the ground... just off the dry line.
Factor those four things in, then look at the event at the Ball Park and ask if the two venues were alike.
--kC
All it takes is one simple mistake and it's gonesville. The best auto-xers in the country many times still make mistakes while running a course. I'm not holding anything like that aginst you. Given the conditions... a small mistake off the 'line' and it's bigger consequenses when there's sand/snow on the ground than if it were an 70-80 degree day and the lots been used for the past couple months to scrub sand/snow off of it.
Many times you said you shouldn't have run them, and you knew it. Not being able to put yourself in check when it's called for is one of the biggest causes of accidents because the driver is overconfident in their abilities.. not seeing the whole picture. I do it too. You're not alone in this. However, what's gotten me really irritated is your attitude here on evo m acting like a little kid because people critisized your choice in tire for the day. Critisism is GOOD... *if* you learn from it. When there's many people saying it was a dumb move... because it was YOU... you're not seeing it. It's like 'love is blind'. Do you understand that?

Sometimes drivers need to take a step back and evaluate things instead of saying 'well if 10 others said it's ok, then it's got to be ok'. (Not realizing those 10 others probably have a few more years of auto-x experience on r-compounds.) Well there are more than 10 people telling you it wasn't ok here on this forum... if you listened to your ten... why are you discounting us? Afterall... you go with the majority, right?

Again... I have more critisism for the event runners than you.
Brennen.... It was raining heavily and it was in the 40-50s. You're right. When I say you 'shouldn't' run them in the rain or in the cold.. to me 'shouldn't' means you're not doing any good and they're not going to grip (set-up choice). Even you said you switched to your streets and had more grip... and more grip means what? More control.

Also... Gwinnett had:
1) Less curbs to hit
2) Was set up as a national event with natioanl caliber drivers running in it (ie: expereince in the rain)
3) Less lightpoles
4) There wasn't any snow on the ground... just off the dry line.
Factor those four things in, then look at the event at the Ball Park and ask if the two venues were alike.
--kC
We don't run in cold weather. If there's snow, events get cancelled. Anything other than that, we call it rally-x and different tires are used and rcompounds are not allowed (all seasons, snows or rally tires only)
We've had events cancelled when we showed up in early April with an inch or more on the ground. We've not allowed people to run with r-compounds/slicks when the rain was so heavy. (I almost hit a tree with Azenis... I was going straight rear end of the car hit the puddle and just pointed me at the tree... the course being designed with safety in mond allowd me to not hit it... and it's the only tree anywhere near the course... it's got my name on it now.
)
It's a safety issue... one our region is not willing to accept the risk that something may happen. We run April to October. That's only times in the year that the weather is satisfactory to run in.
--kC
We've had events cancelled when we showed up in early April with an inch or more on the ground. We've not allowed people to run with r-compounds/slicks when the rain was so heavy. (I almost hit a tree with Azenis... I was going straight rear end of the car hit the puddle and just pointed me at the tree... the course being designed with safety in mond allowd me to not hit it... and it's the only tree anywhere near the course... it's got my name on it now.
)It's a safety issue... one our region is not willing to accept the risk that something may happen. We run April to October. That's only times in the year that the weather is satisfactory to run in.
--kC
Originally Posted by mrbkkt1
wtf? funny SHT ,
http://www.albinoblacksheep.com/flash/numa.php
Sorry to bring this back. But were those really dealer plates on them? He says he auto crosses a lot and he has a lot of experience, but does he mean in the Evo or another car? Someone noted on the first few pages that the rear windshield look like a dealer sticker.


