Notices
Evo General Discuss any generalized technical Evo related topics that may not fit into the other forums. Please do not post tech and rumor threads here.
Sponsored by: RavSpec - JDM Wheels Central

Evo MR pwns porta potty

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 11, 2005 | 12:10 AM
  #121  
dizzigital's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 1,697
Likes: 0
From: Santa Monica, CA
Originally Posted by purecoda
if you want to have some REAL fun, open the link in a few new windows about a second apart each and you can get this guy singing in a round!

hahahaha

good thinking, but that will only cause accidents.

Reply
Old Feb 11, 2005 | 01:41 AM
  #122  
mrbkkt1's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,464
Likes: 1
From: Aiea, Hawaii
wtf? funny SHT ,
Reply
Old Feb 11, 2005 | 05:34 AM
  #123  
KC's Avatar
KC
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 128
Likes: 0
From: SE Mass
Look, I'm more concerned with the safety stewards or operating people NOT turning people away who had r-compounds. I hold to the belief that r-compounds shouldn't be used when the HIGHS for the day/week/month are 55-60 degrees on one or two days. There are people that says it's fine... I've heard from different people saying it's not. It comes down to what we were brought up to beleive and that's something we'll have to agree to disagree on.

All it takes is one simple mistake and it's gonesville. The best auto-xers in the country many times still make mistakes while running a course. I'm not holding anything like that aginst you. Given the conditions... a small mistake off the 'line' and it's bigger consequenses when there's sand/snow on the ground than if it were an 70-80 degree day and the lots been used for the past couple months to scrub sand/snow off of it.

Many times you said you shouldn't have run them, and you knew it. Not being able to put yourself in check when it's called for is one of the biggest causes of accidents because the driver is overconfident in their abilities.. not seeing the whole picture. I do it too. You're not alone in this. However, what's gotten me really irritated is your attitude here on evo m acting like a little kid because people critisized your choice in tire for the day. Critisism is GOOD... *if* you learn from it. When there's many people saying it was a dumb move... because it was YOU... you're not seeing it. It's like 'love is blind'. Do you understand that?

Sometimes drivers need to take a step back and evaluate things instead of saying 'well if 10 others said it's ok, then it's got to be ok'. (Not realizing those 10 others probably have a few more years of auto-x experience on r-compounds.) Well there are more than 10 people telling you it wasn't ok here on this forum... if you listened to your ten... why are you discounting us? Afterall... you go with the majority, right?

Again... I have more critisism for the event runners than you.

Brennen.... It was raining heavily and it was in the 40-50s. You're right. When I say you 'shouldn't' run them in the rain or in the cold.. to me 'shouldn't' means you're not doing any good and they're not going to grip (set-up choice). Even you said you switched to your streets and had more grip... and more grip means what? More control.

Also... Gwinnett had:
1) Less curbs to hit
2) Was set up as a national event with natioanl caliber drivers running in it (ie: expereince in the rain)
3) Less lightpoles
4) There wasn't any snow on the ground... just off the dry line.

Factor those four things in, then look at the event at the Ball Park and ask if the two venues were alike.

--kC
Reply
Old Feb 11, 2005 | 06:35 AM
  #124  
turboICE's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 45
Likes: 0
I have never heard anyone say "I was in an accident because I was going to slow or that I was being too careful." Too fast not careful enough - and hopefully lessons learned.

Well flame levels and event arrangers wishing this would go away aside, if:

1. "Johnny" is OK and the worst he has is a really funny story for the pub.
2. Everyone involved in the event and everyone in contact with this thread leaves having learned from the experience to make tomorrow better.

Then all is not lost.
Reply
Old Feb 11, 2005 | 07:03 AM
  #125  
NOVA EVO's Avatar
Evolved Member
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 1,118
Likes: 0
From: Riverview, FL
Originally Posted by twinevo
well, i'm not too worried about the evo owner. if the potty was occupied then I'd be more worried for that person-although i'm sure this person will get a nice injury lawyer and make a few bucks on the ordeal.
Yup...CHA CHING!!! $$$$$
Reply
Old Feb 11, 2005 | 07:43 AM
  #126  
AaronOZ's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 150
Likes: 0
From: St. Louis, MO
funny is funny, but I think this guy is a dumb-***...
Reply
Old Feb 11, 2005 | 08:14 AM
  #127  
Maron's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 254
Likes: 0
From: Edison New Jersey
Originally Posted by KC
Look, I'm more concerned with the safety stewards or operating people NOT turning people away who had r-compounds. I hold to the belief that r-compounds shouldn't be used when the HIGHS for the day/week/month are 55-60 degrees on one or two days. There are people that says it's fine... I've heard from different people saying it's not. It comes down to what we were brought up to beleive and that's something we'll have to agree to disagree on.

All it takes is one simple mistake and it's gonesville. The best auto-xers in the country many times still make mistakes while running a course. I'm not holding anything like that aginst you. Given the conditions... a small mistake off the 'line' and it's bigger consequenses when there's sand/snow on the ground than if it were an 70-80 degree day and the lots been used for the past couple months to scrub sand/snow off of it.

Many times you said you shouldn't have run them, and you knew it. Not being able to put yourself in check when it's called for is one of the biggest causes of accidents because the driver is overconfident in their abilities.. not seeing the whole picture. I do it too. You're not alone in this. However, what's gotten me really irritated is your attitude here on evo m acting like a little kid because people critisized your choice in tire for the day. Critisism is GOOD... *if* you learn from it. When there's many people saying it was a dumb move... because it was YOU... you're not seeing it. It's like 'love is blind'. Do you understand that?

Sometimes drivers need to take a step back and evaluate things instead of saying 'well if 10 others said it's ok, then it's got to be ok'. (Not realizing those 10 others probably have a few more years of auto-x experience on r-compounds.) Well there are more than 10 people telling you it wasn't ok here on this forum... if you listened to your ten... why are you discounting us? Afterall... you go with the majority, right?

Again... I have more critisism for the event runners than you.

Brennen.... It was raining heavily and it was in the 40-50s. You're right. When I say you 'shouldn't' run them in the rain or in the cold.. to me 'shouldn't' means you're not doing any good and they're not going to grip (set-up choice). Even you said you switched to your streets and had more grip... and more grip means what? More control.

Also... Gwinnett had:
1) Less curbs to hit
2) Was set up as a national event with natioanl caliber drivers running in it (ie: expereince in the rain)
3) Less lightpoles
4) There wasn't any snow on the ground... just off the dry line.

Factor those four things in, then look at the event at the Ball Park and ask if the two venues were alike.

--kC
I'm not hard headed, believe me this is my first year auto-xn and have listen and learn from some of the best drivers out there. I am not being a D8ck or a jerk about the whole incident and acting like I'm above all. Like I said I needed to blow off steam due to the numerous flames on this forum about the whole incident. No one here except for the people that were at the event knew exactly, the context and the conditions. When I pulled up to the event, I wasa literally shock to find that the course was being set on snow and I believe that a lot of other drivers that came was possibly thinking or sayinig the same thing. I remember who you are now and I actually let you drive my old sti back at the subaru challenge event at ripken and commented about understeer.
Reply
Old Feb 11, 2005 | 08:23 AM
  #128  
Maron's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 254
Likes: 0
From: Edison New Jersey
Originally Posted by AaronOZ
funny is funny, but I think this guy is a dumb-***...
KC.

See what I mean?
Reply
Old Feb 11, 2005 | 09:11 AM
  #129  
sonic40's Avatar
Newbie
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 76
Likes: 0
From: Newark, Delaware
Originally Posted by Fast Shadow
You mean it was doing very well up to the point where it jumped the curb and struck a bystander.
Uh, yeah, that's exactly what I mean. He did pass the finish line.
Reply
Old Feb 11, 2005 | 09:29 AM
  #130  
Mr. MR's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 177
Likes: 0
From: Right outside of Philly
Originally Posted by KC
Look, I'm more concerned with the safety stewards or operating people NOT turning people away who had r-compounds. I hold to the belief that r-compounds shouldn't be used when the HIGHS for the day/week/month are 55-60 degrees on one or two days. There are people that says it's fine... I've heard from different people saying it's not. It comes down to what we were brought up to beleive and that's something we'll have to agree to disagree on.

All it takes is one simple mistake and it's gonesville. The best auto-xers in the country many times still make mistakes while running a course. I'm not holding anything like that aginst you. Given the conditions... a small mistake off the 'line' and it's bigger consequenses when there's sand/snow on the ground than if it were an 70-80 degree day and the lots been used for the past couple months to scrub sand/snow off of it.

Many times you said you shouldn't have run them, and you knew it. Not being able to put yourself in check when it's called for is one of the biggest causes of accidents because the driver is overconfident in their abilities.. not seeing the whole picture. I do it too. You're not alone in this. However, what's gotten me really irritated is your attitude here on evo m acting like a little kid because people critisized your choice in tire for the day. Critisism is GOOD... *if* you learn from it. When there's many people saying it was a dumb move... because it was YOU... you're not seeing it. It's like 'love is blind'. Do you understand that?

Sometimes drivers need to take a step back and evaluate things instead of saying 'well if 10 others said it's ok, then it's got to be ok'. (Not realizing those 10 others probably have a few more years of auto-x experience on r-compounds.) Well there are more than 10 people telling you it wasn't ok here on this forum... if you listened to your ten... why are you discounting us? Afterall... you go with the majority, right?

Again... I have more critisism for the event runners than you.

Brennen.... It was raining heavily and it was in the 40-50s. You're right. When I say you 'shouldn't' run them in the rain or in the cold.. to me 'shouldn't' means you're not doing any good and they're not going to grip (set-up choice). Even you said you switched to your streets and had more grip... and more grip means what? More control.

Also... Gwinnett had:
1) Less curbs to hit
2) Was set up as a national event with natioanl caliber drivers running in it (ie: expereince in the rain)
3) Less lightpoles
4) There wasn't any snow on the ground... just off the dry line.

Factor those four things in, then look at the event at the Ball Park and ask if the two venues were alike.

--kC
KC, does your region restrict R tires in cold weather? In 4 years running with this group, this is the most bizarre thing I have seen. No one has been injured since I have run with them. Also the course design was fine I think. The porto potty placement was due to snow banks being where they got placed the last time I was there. I do agree r tires are in those conditions is a very bad choice, obiviously. The odd thing is the porto's were approx. 120' from finish line. They also were perpendicular to it. So imagine he came thru the finish side ways, hit street, car grabbed and went straight for the porto's. No way in a million years would I have thought that was possible. Well I hope all invovled in this and reading this learn something from it. Oh yea, it was known to all members that lot had snow on it. I was exicted to run a snow cross with snow tires!
Reply
Old Feb 11, 2005 | 10:20 AM
  #131  
KC's Avatar
KC
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 128
Likes: 0
From: SE Mass
We don't run in cold weather. If there's snow, events get cancelled. Anything other than that, we call it rally-x and different tires are used and rcompounds are not allowed (all seasons, snows or rally tires only)

We've had events cancelled when we showed up in early April with an inch or more on the ground. We've not allowed people to run with r-compounds/slicks when the rain was so heavy. (I almost hit a tree with Azenis... I was going straight rear end of the car hit the puddle and just pointed me at the tree... the course being designed with safety in mond allowd me to not hit it... and it's the only tree anywhere near the course... it's got my name on it now. )

It's a safety issue... one our region is not willing to accept the risk that something may happen. We run April to October. That's only times in the year that the weather is satisfactory to run in.

--kC
Reply
Old Mar 1, 2005 | 11:35 PM
  #132  
mrmefodman's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 631
Likes: 0
From: porn capital,usa
Originally Posted by Ev0 1
lol, Should've took a picture of the guy that was in there.
hell yeah
Reply
Old Mar 1, 2005 | 11:38 PM
  #133  
dizzigital's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 1,697
Likes: 0
From: Santa Monica, CA
Originally Posted by mrbkkt1
wtf? funny SHT ,
wait, it has been edited to:

http://www.albinoblacksheep.com/flash/numa.php
Reply
Old Mar 1, 2005 | 11:40 PM
  #134  
dizzigital's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 1,697
Likes: 0
From: Santa Monica, CA
i can't believe someone caught him slipping like this.

wow.

what a fool.

GL to your future developments.

please learn from this nothing move.
Reply
Old May 21, 2005 | 01:04 PM
  #135  
Detonate's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
Sorry to bring this back. But were those really dealer plates on them? He says he auto crosses a lot and he has a lot of experience, but does he mean in the Evo or another car? Someone noted on the first few pages that the rear windshield look like a dealer sticker.
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 09:04 AM.