Notices
Evo General Discuss any generalized technical Evo related topics that may not fit into the other forums. Please do not post tech and rumor threads here.
Sponsored by: RavSpec - JDM Wheels Central

HKS or K&N drop in filter?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 23, 2005 | 09:33 AM
  #31  
silverEVO8's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 2,659
Likes: 1
From: Utopia
Originally Posted by CoolDog
Well, if you consider that the stock filter needs to be replaced every so often and the K&N you buy once and just clean it, then yes the K&N is more expensive up front. However, in the long run you are not buying a new air filter every few thousand miles. Due to living near steel mills, I'd get maybe 6000 miles out of an air filter on all my previous vehicles. At $15-$20 a pop it doesn't take long to overcome the price of the K&N.
The K&N plus the associated kits will run you almost $100 (maybe more depending on application). Anyway, you can buy 6 regular filters for that much and that's a lot of miles for most ppl.... For my piece of mine the K&N savings are not worth it...
Reply
Old May 23, 2005 | 09:36 AM
  #32  
Warrtalon's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 20,790
Likes: 2
From: Long Island, NY
Originally Posted by silverEVO8
The K&N gets cleaned and oiled. The oil from the K&N ends up all over the intake track and prolly gets into the fmic as well. There is no way that oily box can flow as well as the stock filter. Oh yeah, I don't have the info handy but there have been several studies and comparos made of the K&N and other filters vs. the stock filter in many cars. I remember the results were clearly in favor of the stock or other similar paper filters as far as filtration and flow as long as they are replaced as needed. For sure they are hella cheaper than the K&N plus the oil and cleaning kits, etc. I've tried the K&N and it did not work well for me. YMMV, etc.
Ok, well, I haven't seen any studies claiming that the stock filter flows as well as a K&N, much less several. The stock filter does not flow well at all, but if you can show me proof, I'd gladly take heed. K&N has had a much higher flower capacity than stock filters for many years on many cars. Are you saying the stock OEM Evo filter is suddenly better than any stock filter before?
Reply
Old May 23, 2005 | 12:39 PM
  #33  
silverEVO8's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 2,659
Likes: 1
From: Utopia
Originally Posted by Warrtalon
Ok, well, I haven't seen any studies claiming that the stock filter flows as well as a K&N, much less several. The stock filter does not flow well at all, but if you can show me proof, I'd gladly take heed. K&N has had a much higher flower capacity than stock filters for many years on many cars. Are you saying the stock OEM Evo filter is suddenly better than any stock filter before?
Who says the stock filter flows less air than the K&N? I have not seen any proof that the K&N flows better than the stock filter.... Oh yeah, I guarantee you that after I've cleaned and oiled the K&N, it definitely wont flow as well, or at least it flows a lot of oil all over the place. I'm not the only one to experience this either..... I don't know if the tests that show the K&N flowing better were conducted with a dry filter..... Sure, some of the K&N filters will flow better than some stock filters, but that's prolly because they are much larger in area.... The drop-in filters are exactly the same size and the k&N is full of oil and crap like that..... How's it gonna flow more air than a new stock filter?
Reply
Old May 23, 2005 | 01:46 PM
  #34  
silverEVO8's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 2,659
Likes: 1
From: Utopia
Originally Posted by Warrtalon
Ok, well, I haven't seen any studies claiming that the stock filter flows as well as a K&N, much less several. The stock filter does not flow well at all, but if you can show me proof, I'd gladly take heed. K&N has had a much higher flower capacity than stock filters for many years on many cars. Are you saying the stock OEM Evo filter is suddenly better than any stock filter before?
Well, you might be right although there is no proof that I've found regarding a comparo between the K&N and the stock filter.

However, air flow is not the only factor to consider when choosing an air filter. Looking into the more important factor which is effective filtration and longevity (time between replacing/cleaning filters) there is an interesting article to look at. Check out http://home.usadatanet.net/~jbplock/ISO5011/SPICER.htm

Very interesting............
Reply
Old May 23, 2005 | 07:53 PM
  #35  
12mnkys's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 148
Likes: 0
From: www.midwestevos.com
I have a k&n drop-in that i used for Maybe 500 miles...went with the RS instead...PM me if you are interested...$40 + ship...

Mike
Reply
Old May 23, 2005 | 07:57 PM
  #36  
Jakeg97's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (56)
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 11,132
Likes: 1
From: Western NY
K&n
Reply
Old May 23, 2005 | 08:03 PM
  #37  
3mta3's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 29
Likes: 0
From: bay area 415
I've got the works filter. Didn't feel any real hp difference, but crisper throttle response is definately appearent. all in all a good replacement @ 9000 miles of city driving. More surface area generally means more air flow.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Fawkz
Evo X General
3
Feb 3, 2014 04:44 PM
AyoJon!
Evo X General
36
Mar 5, 2010 07:25 AM
hoongss
Evo X Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain
45
Aug 6, 2008 09:56 PM
cheesehead713
EvoM New Member / FAQs / EvoM Rules
9
Oct 28, 2007 12:03 PM
lomax6
Evo Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain
34
Oct 23, 2003 09:10 AM




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 12:45 PM.