Which Intake Pipe can be used with stock air box?
Originally Posted by MRinChrist
So I have been reading about intake pipes and MAF misreadings, do you find this a problem?...Why did you go Dejon with Swain coat?
thanks
thanks
BTW, I'd say getting a GT40 turbo is overkill. The Swain Tech coating is cheap insurance, as far as I'm concerned. I've attached pics of my Dejon Tool post Swain Tech here in this thread:
"Mmmm...Swain Tech goodness inside" in Evo Engine/Turbo/Drivetrain
Last edited by Erik@MIL.SPEC; Jun 3, 2005 at 02:02 PM.
Originally Posted by scherejs
i used to have the dejon tool intake, but had a lot of stalling issues with it. i have since replaced it with the injen kit and absolutely love it. i have no stalling with the injen. it's also easier to tune. with my wideband and afc i could never get consistant readings and tunes with the dejon intake. the injen has made it a lot easier to tune my fuel curve and also have noticed a peak 7whp gain with the injen over the dejon.
Originally Posted by atlvalet
Was this the Dejon with the stock air box or aftermarket filter?
Originally Posted by marksae
Jamie,
I have an HKS intake pipe that I'm a little hesitant to install because I'm concerned with skewed MAF readings. Have you guys done any testing on using a hard intake pipe with the stock airbox? I'd like to know if it'll work with my P2.
I have an HKS intake pipe that I'm a little hesitant to install because I'm concerned with skewed MAF readings. Have you guys done any testing on using a hard intake pipe with the stock airbox? I'd like to know if it'll work with my P2.
Hey Mark,
I have and HKS RS with my P2. I am going back to the stock air box. Since installing my 269 cams, the idle has suffered alot. I figure the engine is getting choked from all the HOT air in the engine bay. The car runs like a dream on the go but just the idle is rough.
Originally Posted by scherejs
it was with an aftermarket filter. i have no experience with the dejon pipe and the stock airbox. when using the airbox you might not have the problem i did.
Originally Posted by Compjoc
Hey Mark,
I have and HKS RS with my P2. I am going back to the stock air box. Since installing my 269 cams, the idle has suffered alot. I figure the engine is getting choked from all the HOT air in the engine bay. The car runs like a dream on the go but just the idle is rough.
I have and HKS RS with my P2. I am going back to the stock air box. Since installing my 269 cams, the idle has suffered alot. I figure the engine is getting choked from all the HOT air in the engine bay. The car runs like a dream on the go but just the idle is rough.
Originally Posted by marksae
Are you gonna keep the HKS intake pipe while reinstalling the stock airbox?
Stock air box plus works drop in works like a charm, I just go tmy dejon pipe goign to put it on it def cant hurt anything just make the flow a little less turbulent than the stock pipe.
Originally Posted by marksae
Jamie,
I have an HKS intake pipe that I'm a little hesitant to install because I'm concerned with skewed MAF readings. Have you guys done any testing on using a hard intake pipe with the stock airbox? I'd like to know if it'll work with my P2.
I have an HKS intake pipe that I'm a little hesitant to install because I'm concerned with skewed MAF readings. Have you guys done any testing on using a hard intake pipe with the stock airbox? I'd like to know if it'll work with my P2.
We're not fans of intake "kits" that replace the airbox as we've found (as you mention) odd readings at the VAF. There are two parts to this equation: one being the pre-sensor filter, the other the post-sensor piping. Of the two, the piping generally provides the least amount of disturbance to the sensor. It still has somewhat of an effect, but not as significant as the filter may. We haven't done signifcant testing with the Samco unit as of yet, but intend to do some soon.
Originally Posted by Jamie@WORKS
Mark,
We're not fans of intake "kits" that replace the airbox as we've found (as you mention) odd readings at the VAF. There are two parts to this equation: one being the pre-sensor filter, the other the post-sensor piping. Of the two, the piping generally provides the least amount of disturbance to the sensor. It still has somewhat of an effect, but not as significant as the filter may. We haven't done signifcant testing with the Samco unit as of yet, but intend to do some soon.
We're not fans of intake "kits" that replace the airbox as we've found (as you mention) odd readings at the VAF. There are two parts to this equation: one being the pre-sensor filter, the other the post-sensor piping. Of the two, the piping generally provides the least amount of disturbance to the sensor. It still has somewhat of an effect, but not as significant as the filter may. We haven't done signifcant testing with the Samco unit as of yet, but intend to do some soon.
If you want to do some testing, I can let you guys borrow my HKS intake pipe. I'd like to know if it affects AFRs.
Mark
Originally Posted by Jamie@WORKS
Mark,
We're not fans of intake "kits" that replace the airbox as we've found (as you mention) odd readings at the VAF. There are two parts to this equation: one being the pre-sensor filter, the other the post-sensor piping. Of the two, the piping generally provides the least amount of disturbance to the sensor. It still has somewhat of an effect, but not as significant as the filter may. We haven't done signifcant testing with the Samco unit as of yet, but intend to do some soon.
We're not fans of intake "kits" that replace the airbox as we've found (as you mention) odd readings at the VAF. There are two parts to this equation: one being the pre-sensor filter, the other the post-sensor piping. Of the two, the piping generally provides the least amount of disturbance to the sensor. It still has somewhat of an effect, but not as significant as the filter may. We haven't done signifcant testing with the Samco unit as of yet, but intend to do some soon.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
varner88
For Sale/WTB - Engine / Drivetrain / Power
8
Nov 23, 2009 03:21 PM
smgevo
Evo X Engine Management / Tuning Forums
9
Nov 15, 2008 03:11 PM
bo0oost
Evo Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain
20
Nov 4, 2004 10:31 AM
