If I put down 263whp on BR's Mustang Dyno, what do you think I would have put down on a not-screwed with Dynojet?

Also, if some of my friends ask what my whp is, what's the right number? Is it the average of the two dyno's, or do I just give the two #'s from both dyno's.

Don't want to give the wrong #'s.

Also, I know dyno's are really for baselines pulls and then for determining increases in power for upgrades (on the same dyno).

Thanks,

 

I think I have personally answered this question 10-15 times in 10-15 threads. SEARCH! Dynojets run average 15-20% higher than mustangs, so figure 263 becomes 302. What mods do you have done, also?

 

Current Mods:

Greddy 3'' Catback
Greddy BOV
Greddy Profec EBC (22psi)

Buschur Racing Stage III - Includes:
BR Highflow Cat
BR 3'' DP
BR Intake/Upper Intercooler (Battery Kit)
Waldro Fuel Pump
264/264 Cams
BR Intercooler & lower piping
Custom Tune (Al)

Thought I would get more whp with my current mods but maybe the Greddy stuff is throwing the #'s off.

 

So, I guess the answer to my question is that there really isn't an answer? If you say Dynojets run 15-20% higher, does that mean Dynojets are overating whp or Mustang Dyno's are underating whp?

Sorry. Still learning about all this good stuff.

 

probably 320whp....You should try it, im wanna see the results.

 

Who cares....

 

Basic rundown is the mustang runs lower because it is a load bearing dyno. That means it is more accurate and therefore better for tuning. Since it reads lower, the dynojet is the preferred dyno for people who want to brag about their numbers. If you search then you can read more specifics about the dynos.

 

Thanks. I think I will read a bit more about the dynojet. Interesting stuff.

 

Since you live in Cincy, do you know of a dynojet in the area? I'd like to see the difference as well. I've never been on anything but a Mustang.