Notices
Evo General Discuss any generalized technical Evo related topics that may not fit into the other forums. Please do not post tech and rumor threads here.
Sponsored by: RavSpec - JDM Wheels Central

Dyno results from Performance Autowerks...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 8, 2005, 12:13 PM
  #1  
Evolving Member
Thread Starter
 
Dan2510's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Chicago
Posts: 192
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Dyno results from Performance Autowerks...

Great guys over there big Thanks to Mike and Dave. My dyno was done on a mustang dyno here are the results, I'm bone stock to the filter:

2005 Evo 8
HP: 234.4
Torque: 272.0

Maybe Mike or Dave can post my graph for me.

Thanks guys
Old Oct 8, 2005, 12:28 PM
  #2  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Warrtalon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Long Island, NY
Posts: 20,790
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by Dan2510
Great guys over there big Thanks to Mike and Dave. My dyno was done on a mustang dyno here are the results, I'm bone stock to the filter:

2005 Evo 8
HP: 234.4
Torque: 272.0

Maybe Mike or Dave can post my graph for me.

Thanks guys
Sorry, but those numbers are useless for posting on the Internet. You should instruct them to fix their settings or just not bother going there again really. The only reason to go back there is to compare your numbers AFTER mods just to see the difference. If you try to compare those numbers with anyone else in the country, it just won't work, since those numbes are incredibly inflated for a Mustang Dyno.
Old Oct 8, 2005, 12:30 PM
  #3  
Evolving Member
Thread Starter
 
Dan2510's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Chicago
Posts: 192
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Warrtalon
Sorry, but those numbers are useless for posting on the Internet. You should instruct them to fix their settings or just not bother going there again really. The only reason to go back there is to compare your numbers AFTER mods just to see the difference. If you try to compare those numbers with anyone else in the country, it just won't work, since those numbes are incredibly inflated for a Mustang Dyno.
Dang I thought I got some good numbers to.
Old Oct 8, 2005, 12:31 PM
  #4  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (21)
 
Turbojunkie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: nw
Posts: 1,425
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Warrtalon, your allways so nice to people.
Old Oct 8, 2005, 12:32 PM
  #5  
Evolving Member
Thread Starter
 
Dan2510's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Chicago
Posts: 192
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Turbojunkie
Warrtalon, your allways so nice to people.
He keeps it real
Old Oct 8, 2005, 12:35 PM
  #6  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Precision Dyno's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 978
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I have never seen a Mustang dyno put down those numbers bone stock. Either the MD is setup to read like a dynojet or something is not reading right.
Trust me I have dynoed 50+ evos on my MD.
Old Oct 8, 2005, 12:36 PM
  #7  
Evolving Member
Thread Starter
 
Dan2510's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Chicago
Posts: 192
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Precision Dyno
I have never seen a Mustang dyno put down those numbers bone stock. Either the MD is setup to read like a dynojet or something is not reading right.
Trust me I have dynoed 50+ evos on my MD.
So my numbers would be better compared to a dynojet then a MD? Wow, so basically I paid for inaccurate readings...
Old Oct 8, 2005, 12:37 PM
  #8  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (21)
 
Turbojunkie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: nw
Posts: 1,425
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Dan2510
So my numbers would be better compared to a dynojet then a MD? Wow, so basically I paid for inaccurate readings...
do a search, it all in how the operator sets up the dyno. he can get just about what ever numbers he wants you to get.
Old Oct 8, 2005, 12:37 PM
  #9  
Evolving Member
iTrader: (6)
 
evoland's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: HUMBOLDT
Posts: 247
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
nice work warrtalon!!
Old Oct 8, 2005, 12:38 PM
  #10  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Precision Dyno's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 978
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Dan2510
So my numbers would be better compared to a dynojet then a MD? Wow, so basically I paid for inaccurate readings...
Your numbers are completely inflated. BIG TIME
Old Oct 8, 2005, 12:40 PM
  #11  
Evolving Member
Thread Starter
 
Dan2510's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Chicago
Posts: 192
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Precision Dyno
Your numbers are completely inflated. BIG TIME
I'm just pissed now that blows. I mean I paid for a service that has been alterd to make me happy. Well AMS is Oct 29th I'll try theres out..
Old Oct 8, 2005, 12:42 PM
  #12  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Precision Dyno's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 978
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Turbojunkie
do a search, it all in how the operator sets up the dyno. he can get just about what ever numbers he wants you to get.
Correct. The MD's across the country would read pretty close to each other if they would just leave the load cell and inertia levels alone. Instead they increase them for peak numbers.
The dyno can easily be calibrated once it is at the location. That number should be used ALL THE TIME. (2WDhas one and AWD has another)
We have never changed ours since it was installed.
Customers complain all the time about the end result.
I would rather have an accurate load reading then a calculated number based on thoeretical and false inertial values.
Old Oct 8, 2005, 12:43 PM
  #13  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Precision Dyno's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 978
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Dan2510
I'm just pissed now that blows. I mean I paid for a service that has been alterd to make me happy. Well AMS is Oct 29th I'll try theres out..
It is a dynojet bud.... The numbers will make you happy as well.
Old Oct 8, 2005, 12:46 PM
  #14  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (21)
 
Turbojunkie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: nw
Posts: 1,425
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Precision Dyno
Correct. The MD's across the country would read pretty close to each other if they would just leave the load cell and inertia levels alone. Instead they increase them for peak numbers.
The dyno can easily be calibrated once it is at the location. That number should be used ALL THE TIME. (2WDhas one and AWD has another)
We have never changed ours since it was installed.
Customers complain all the time about the end result.
I would rather have an accurate load reading then a calculated number based on thoeretical ans false inertial values.
yes, this why you see guys all the time claming to have 350+ whp dyno sheets and 13.xx 1/4 mile time slips. get your "real" numbers and them start building from there. try and use the same dyno for each upgade also. if its set right and you go back to the same one after each( or whatever) mod you do you're getting the most accurate results. my 02 anyway.
Old Oct 8, 2005, 12:49 PM
  #15  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Precision Dyno's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 978
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Turbojunkie
yes, this why you see guys all the time claming to have 350+ whp dyno sheets and 13.xx 1/4 mile time slips. get your "real" numbers and them start building from there. try and use the same dyno for each upgade also. if its set right and you go back to the same one after each( or whatever) mod you do you're getting the most accurate results. my 02 anyway.
You are 100% correct.


Quick Reply: Dyno results from Performance Autowerks...



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 08:04 AM.