Bone stock IX goes 12.89
Originally Posted by Warrtalon
You gotta be kidding me. How ridiculous. I know you didn't have a means of raising boost, but I run about .4s and 4mph faster on race gas...
Originally Posted by wingless
1. Stock is mapped for 91. Using 100 is just a saftey net and would make no difference in perf. Again!
2.Time slip please... (even though I can make one in photo shop in about a minute)
3.Mr. Warralton? Curious to see what this guy has to say.
4.Sweet run.
2.Time slip please... (even though I can make one in photo shop in about a minute)
3.Mr. Warralton? Curious to see what this guy has to say.
4.Sweet run.
Agreed I would like to see a timeslip
Originally Posted by Dan2510
However, your not stock though like he is.
You quoted me as saying "I know you didn't have a means of raising boost" which infers that I do have a means of raising boost and know that it makes more of a difference than when stock. I know I'm not stock, but you DON'T know that 100oct didn't give him more power.
No 12.8s will be legit when it's on 100oct.
Im no expert on fuels but even my Lexus GX 470 manual states that performance will be increased with 91 octane vs. 87 Octane but that 91 octane is not required.
My gut tells me running 100 vs. 91-93 etc. will increase performance in a late model turbocharged car with an ECU what can adapt to fuels both up and down the performance spectrum. Boost would not have to be increased to see this.
Its a well known fact that higher octane fuels vs. lower octane fuels have the same energy BUT the higher octane fuels allow for more use of this energy. I believe your good driving + the IX tweaks vs. the VIII + the 100 octane all contributed to the timeslip. I also believe this time would be reduced on 91-93 gas.
Just my .02
My gut tells me running 100 vs. 91-93 etc. will increase performance in a late model turbocharged car with an ECU what can adapt to fuels both up and down the performance spectrum. Boost would not have to be increased to see this.
Its a well known fact that higher octane fuels vs. lower octane fuels have the same energy BUT the higher octane fuels allow for more use of this energy. I believe your good driving + the IX tweaks vs. the VIII + the 100 octane all contributed to the timeslip. I also believe this time would be reduced on 91-93 gas.
Just my .02
fuel summary:
the evo will run perfectly fine on 91, 92, or 94 octane gas. at sustained high boost situations the lower octane fuels are more likely to predetinate which will cause the standard ecu to pull some timing.
using 100 octane will not increase the power output of the engine, it will prevent power loss as a result of the ecu pulling timing due to pinging.
the evo will run perfectly fine on 91, 92, or 94 octane gas. at sustained high boost situations the lower octane fuels are more likely to predetinate which will cause the standard ecu to pull some timing.
using 100 octane will not increase the power output of the engine, it will prevent power loss as a result of the ecu pulling timing due to pinging.
Originally Posted by Greg K
fuel summary:
the evo will run perfectly fine on 91, 92, or 94 octane gas. at sustained high boost situations the lower octane fuels are more likely to predetinate which will cause the standard ecu to pull some timing.
using 100 octane will not increase the power output of the engine, it will prevent power loss as a result of the ecu pulling timing due to pinging.
the evo will run perfectly fine on 91, 92, or 94 octane gas. at sustained high boost situations the lower octane fuels are more likely to predetinate which will cause the standard ecu to pull some timing.
using 100 octane will not increase the power output of the engine, it will prevent power loss as a result of the ecu pulling timing due to pinging.
The simple fact is that you can't claim a stock time when running race gas. All he needs to do is try it again on 93oct.
12.89 is a pretty damn good time .. Really glad mistu fianlly sent the Evos to the US .. makes me want back one now ..... But i want to hear loud BOV
and new evos are a pain to get that dun .. hehe .. guess i will look into gettin a JDM Evo .
Go away Watermellon
and new evos are a pain to get that dun .. hehe .. guess i will look into gettin a JDM Evo .Go away Watermellon
Originally Posted by Warrtalon
The simple fact is that you can't claim a stock time when running race gas. All he needs to do is try it again on 93oct.
where's the time slip? we need a run on 93 oct, the ecu adjusts for higher octane, we all know that, so this 100octane run is. . . .well, is a 100 octane run. . .hell, I'm sure I could pull 12.89 on 100 octane as well!
Bone Stock IX goes 12.89
Betting this is 100 unleaded fuel they used. Not so sure you want to call any unleaded fuel race gas. Sure it has a higher octane rating. But its formulation and density is not that of say C14, C16, Sunoco, Cam2, Turbo Blue, ELF, or Torco race fuels that have 4-5 grams of lead per gallon.
There is 100 unleaded at some of the 76 stations here and in CA. It helps, smells like race gas, cuts down on knock. But doesn't clog up O2 sensors or Cat Converters. Its like saying diet Coke is the same as the real thing.
Somebody will make a 100% all stock pass yet on a IX. With an RS, MR and GSR. Will just take some time.
There is 100 unleaded at some of the 76 stations here and in CA. It helps, smells like race gas, cuts down on knock. But doesn't clog up O2 sensors or Cat Converters. Its like saying diet Coke is the same as the real thing.
Somebody will make a 100% all stock pass yet on a IX. With an RS, MR and GSR. Will just take some time.
Last edited by Early EVO; Oct 21, 2005 at 08:12 AM. Reason: bad spelling
Originally Posted by Warrtalon
The simple fact is that you can't claim a stock time when running race gas. All he needs to do is try it again on 93oct.
However you would say Stock Car on Race Gas
Nice times and please re-run using 93 octance to quiet people down.
All I know is that when I use 100 vs 93 octance with no changes the car seems to have more TQ. Was it knocking before I don't know but doubt it.
All I know is that when I use 100 vs 93 octance with no changes the car seems to have more TQ. Was it knocking before I don't know but doubt it.






