Notices
Evo General Discuss any generalized technical Evo related topics that may not fit into the other forums. Please do not post tech and rumor threads here.
Sponsored by: RavSpec - JDM Wheels Central

TopGear Evo VIII vs STi article

Old Apr 4, 2003 | 01:48 PM
  #17  
JT-KGY's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 1,076
Likes: 0
From: Los Angeles, CA
Originally posted by Claudius
Yes, that's normal if you drive hard. Subaru brakes last even less!
I do not understand the brake difference...???
Aren't they both using brembo 4 pistons front and 2 pistons
rear??? Why would one fade faster than the other?
Diff pads?? Diff brake lines maybe?
Reply
Old Apr 4, 2003 | 02:09 PM
  #18  
evomk8's Avatar
Evolved Member
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 590
Likes: 0
From: Phoenix, AZ
Originally posted by 97itr153


I'm willing to bet that on a typical road course or an autocross track, a stock USDM STi will lap faster than a stock USDM EVO.

If you look at "Best Motoring's" lap times from Tsubuka, you will notice that the JDM EVO and the JDM STi generally put in very similar lap times, with a VERY slight edge to the EVOs. However, the JDM STi and EVO produce similar bhp. The USDM STi's 29 bhp advantage and the USDM Evo's lack of a front LSD should skew the results in the STi's favour.

Tsukuba Lap Times of STOCK Evo V, VI, VII and New shape STi from recent "Best Motoring" tests.
http://www.tuningpt.com/store/tsukuba.htm
Notice how close all the lap times are! The spread from the 2nd fastest to the 2nd slowest is only 1 second.
1:04.65 Evo V RS
1:04.93 Evo VII RS
1:05.12 Sti Type RA Spec C (2001)
1:05.15 Evo VI RS
1:05.56 Sti Spec C (2003)
1:05.57 Sti (2003)
1:05.69 Evo VI GSR
1:05.72 Evo VI GSR TME
1:05.84 STi Spec C (2001)
1:05.93 Evo VII GSR
1:07.09 Evo V GSR


It's interesting how the fastest EVO and STi are NOT the latest versions. I couldn't find anything on the EVO VIII.
With the numbers being so close, it's simply the driver and the ever-changing environment at the time of the test. The variables are so numerous it's ridiculous.
I think that overall, even though the STi will have the extra gizmos and the bigger engine, the determining factor will be the driver.
Reply
Old Apr 4, 2003 | 02:47 PM
  #19  
loudogz's Avatar
Newbie
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 57
Likes: 0
From: airmont, ny
too bad US got the watered-down version of the EVO...
Reply
Old Apr 4, 2003 | 03:32 PM
  #20  
evo1's Avatar
Evolved Member
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 908
Likes: 0
From: Sarasota
Originally posted by loudogz
too bad US got the watered-down version of the EVO...
I don't agree with that .. for an everyday driver like myself ... no need for the other stuff besides the extra HP ... just more stuff that can break IMO. I'm sure both cars perform/ handle very similar ...
Reply
Old Apr 4, 2003 | 04:10 PM
  #21  
97itr153's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 94
Likes: 0
From: Minneapolis
Originally posted by evomk8


With the numbers being so close, it's simply the driver and the ever-changing environment at the time of the test. The variables are so numerous it's ridiculous.
I think that overall, even though the STi will have the extra gizmos and the bigger engine, the determining factor will be the driver.
It goes without saying that when we talk about lap times, we ALWAYS assume equal drivers. Otherwise, there is no point in discussing lap times. Period.

There are plenty of drivers who have the ability to extract a 1% difference in lap times between two cars. Take a look at the racing credentials of the test drivers at "Best Motoring" and you will realize how good these drivers are.
http://www.bestmotoringvideo.com/reviewers.html

Last edited by 97itr153; Apr 4, 2003 at 06:42 PM.
Reply
Old Apr 4, 2003 | 04:21 PM
  #22  
evomk8's Avatar
Evolved Member
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 590
Likes: 0
From: Phoenix, AZ
Point well taken.
I should have clarified the point is was making. Most of us (non-pro drivers) will likely not be able to tell the difference.
Reply
Old Apr 4, 2003 | 04:57 PM
  #23  
nynguah's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 115
Likes: 0
From: Orange County
I have a feeling that if one were to go for a ride in either vehicle around the track with one of the test drivers (or Rhys Millen for example), one would be powerfully motivated to rush out and purchase whichever vehicle had been tested.

Both cars are going to kick a$$ - it's going to be the whole Mustang vs. Camaro rivalry all over again

-Josh
Reply
Old Apr 4, 2003 | 05:01 PM
  #24  
ru4real's Avatar
Evolved Member
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 1,062
Likes: 0
From: Los Angeles, CA
Originally posted by JT-KGY


I do not understand the brake difference...???
Aren't they both using brembo 4 pistons front and 2 pistons
rear??? Why would one fade faster than the other?
Diff pads?? Diff brake lines maybe?
There could be differences in the brake pad compounds and operating temperature ranges, airflow around the brakes and wheels, cooling abilities of the rotors and calipers, brake force bias between the front and rear, GVW (the Evo is listed at 60kg lighter), unsprung weight, and weight transfer under braking.
Reply
Old Apr 4, 2003 | 05:09 PM
  #25  
P2x's Avatar
P2x
Newbie
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 57
Likes: 0
Originally posted by ru4real

There could be differences in the brake pad compounds and operating temperature ranges, airflow around the brakes and wheels, cooling abilities of the rotors and calipers, brake force bias between the front and rear, GVW (the Evo is listed at 60kg lighter), unsprung weight, and weight transfer under braking.
Yeah, that's true. When I was watching that evo training vid that's floating around here they mention the design of the front spoiler and how it is conducive to directing air flow over the brakes. Things like that will definitely make a difference..

Last edited by P2x; Apr 4, 2003 at 06:03 PM.
Reply
Old Apr 4, 2003 | 05:09 PM
  #26  
TaiwanEvo's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 414
Likes: 0
From: Los Angeles
evo ROCKS!
Reply
Old Apr 4, 2003 | 05:29 PM
  #27  
Rafal's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 139
Likes: 0
Originally posted by TaiwanEvo
evo ROCKS!
Sure man!
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Foolproof
Evo General
1
Feb 17, 2010 03:47 PM
1GTURNZ
Evo X General
25
Jan 26, 2010 11:31 PM
Jakeg97
Evo General
10
Nov 5, 2004 08:37 PM


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -7. The time now is 03:48 PM.