Would anybody be up for an EVO vs. S2000 Competition?
Originally Posted by Tpayne84
Ps. tail wager... do your research before you claim that a car does something... the miata is a low 15 sec car and your 03 s2k is a low 14 sec car... its a little closer to your "real sports car" than you thought isnt it?? im sure for the extra 7 grand that you pay you can make the miata way faster than the s2k
: http://www.caranddriver.com/article....&page_number=5
Im glad you waited for your account to activate just so you could prove to EvoM how dumb you are.
: http://www.caranddriver.com/article....&page_number=5 Im glad you waited for your account to activate just so you could prove to EvoM how dumb you are.

As far as how dumb I am, nice going insulting strangers who tried to be very polite posting on your forum. A real sign of inteligence there. Way to make evo owners look like sh1theads...
Nice to see none of you guys are comenting about the vid I posted.
Originally Posted by rodman
Mmm, all and any review I have ever read about an Evo said that no other car in this price range can touch it in performance. I have never read anything like that about an S-2000
Blah, I killed an S-2000 with my old 92 Talon for crying out loud
Blah, I killed an S-2000 with my old 92 Talon for crying out loud

You're joking right, just about any article ever written about the S2K says that. I don't even need to post a link, go find any article or S2000 review.
Originally Posted by Tail Wager
Ahem, I did do research, how bout you... The low 15's is for the the turbocharged mazdaspeed version... This is where I got my info: http://www.albeedigital.com/supercoupe/articles/0-60times.html
As far as how dumb I am, nice going insulting strangers who tried to be very polite posting on your forum. A real sign of inteligence there. Way to make evo owners look like sh1theads...
Nice to see none of you guys are comenting about the vid I posted.
As far as how dumb I am, nice going insulting strangers who tried to be very polite posting on your forum. A real sign of inteligence there. Way to make evo owners look like sh1theads...
Nice to see none of you guys are comenting about the vid I posted.
And how about that sh1thead article some sh1thead posted on your boards about how crappy the Evo is compared to the S2k? Guess it goes both ways, sh1thead.
Originally Posted by evo_what
LOL at that S2000.... Warrtalon's Evo is faster than that, and its probably got 1/5the the ammount of money into it. 12.48 is NOTHING to be proud of. what a joke.
I think posting that complete bullsh1t of a writeup on Evo vs. S2k on their homepage was very uncalled for. They trash talked the Evo and glorified the S2k way too much.
S2k owners are officialy, in my books, as cocky and ignorant as BMW owners once were. Saying they are comparable to FERRARI's? Whatever those S2k guys are smoking, i hope they pass it over here. Honestly you could say an Evo is comparable to lambo's and ferrari's, because TOPGEAR PROVED IT (grandit it was an FQ400, but we can easilly make 400BHP).
S2k people need to shut up, and take the **** talk off their website. We never posted anything trash talking them, because we dont need to **** talk people to feel better about our cars (although we will **** talk to defend them). It was obviously an S2k owner, tired of getting SMOKED by Evo's, who decided to post about how crappy they are.
Comparing an S2000 to a ferrari... lol pleeeeease. Stupid ricers
Last edited by DreamLike1; Mar 17, 2006 at 12:49 PM.
Originally Posted by Fierysun
Let me see...
S2000:
RWD
Convertible
2 Door
Naturally aspirated
Light weight (not alot of baggage space)
Short wheelbase
Miata:
RWD
Convertible
2 Door
Naturally aspirated
Light weight (not alot of baggage space)
Short wheelbase
Evo:
AWD
Hard top
4 Door
Turbo
Medium weight (with enough room for 5 and a huge trunk)
Long wheelbase
You tell me which is more similar.
S2000:
RWD
Convertible
2 Door
Naturally aspirated
Light weight (not alot of baggage space)
Short wheelbase
Miata:
RWD
Convertible
2 Door
Naturally aspirated
Light weight (not alot of baggage space)
Short wheelbase
Evo:
AWD
Hard top
4 Door
Turbo
Medium weight (with enough room for 5 and a huge trunk)
Long wheelbase
You tell me which is more similar.
Nice try though
12.48 in an s2k? not impressed. I have a friend that ran a 12.7 in an 05 STi with exhaust only. I have a55raped plenty of s2k's from a stop and from a roll. AutoX is where the s2k shines above the Evo. I think s2k's are gorgeous, respectable cars. But half of the people that drive them are dumb as hell. There's a guy here in VA with plates that say 2SOON Jr. I wanna slap him every time I see him. He looks like an even gayer version of Paul Walker with his super cool reflective sunshades.
Originally Posted by Tail Wager
Like I said in the part of my quote you quoted: "They're both roadsters and they both handle well but similarities end there. " The similarities you mentioned are the ones that make them roadsters just like I did. where I said they where disimilar was in performance: "Comparing an S2000 to a Miata in terms of performance is the dumbest thing I think I've ever read"
Nice try though
Nice try though
Originally Posted by YellowS2000
Stock S2000's hit 13.6's you dumb ****. And that's with 240 hp and no AWD. Let's see your piece of **** evo hit that with that hp figure and without your AWD advantage. Like I said, come on the highway (where I do 75% of my driving) and I'll hand you your ***. And it's a sad thing that your EVO's are in 4th gear @ 70 mph. Goes to show you just why the evo is fast down low. Keep it on, I got a lot more to say
Originally Posted by SKILMATIC
Ok hold on a sec bud. the s2000 doesnt run the quarter in 13.6. It runs it @ 14.4 @ 97.2MPH. That is a stock s2000. I got my info from s2000 road test. You cant get much more accurate then that and it was a 2004 s2000they tested.
And also where do you get the fantasy that you can beat an evo on the freeway? I am assuming your car is stock?
And also where do you get the fantasy that you can beat an evo on the freeway? I am assuming your car is stock?
In addition, Stock S's have hit 13.6, I do'n't know if the 13.6 is posted here but here are a bunch of timeslips if you need proof: http://www.s2ki.com/forums/index.php?showtopic=343031
Apparently lots of EVO's have been beeten on the freeway, but that's just word of mouth (and we all know how much that's worth...) But in my personal experience with STI's we're just about even.
Last edited by Tail Wager; Mar 17, 2006 at 01:03 PM.
Originally Posted by EvoVIII_MR2005
Our second gear takes us up over 60 mph. Where did you get that from? And a stock evo would rape a stock s2k for top speed. S2K's are quick, Evo's are fast.
wholy **** he said 13.6????? WOW!! The best time I've ever seen is a 14.2-14.4 out of an s2k. no torque whatsoever. And like I stated before, I've a55raped plenty of s2k's on the highway AND from the light. Even when my car was farked up and runnin off of wastegate pressure (11psi) the s2k still couldn't leave me. I like s2k's but some of the owners are ruining it for the car. 13.6 HAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!


