EVO IX Performance
Originally Posted by GPTourer
Why would Garrett have the specs of a turbo made by Mitsubishi Heavy Industries?
Also just a side note turbonetics which is a huge name in turbos actually fabs their parts off of garret parts. Apexi, greddy, and hks use innovate and garret parts.
Its kinda like when someone comes out with a carbon fiber hood. For instance, if fiber images came out with the first carbon fiber hood for a supra well after that every other cf fabricator on the market will make knock offs and use that as the prototype. Its actually a growing problem in that field.
Originally Posted by Evo_Kid
I also see Al gettin' around 330 HP & TQ with with just a Flash, TBE and MBC on pruvens dyno, which, IIRC, a stock IX is around 270 +/- 10 HP & TQ, which is a gain of 60 HP & TQ.
A VIII doen't get a gain of 60wtq from those mods. It's the MIVEC.
The HP gain comes from the better turbo.
A VIII doen't get a gain of 60wtq from those mods. It's the MIVEC.
The HP gain comes from the better turbo.
Do you see the graph you posted from Vishnu? Why do you think that IX's torque is so low? It has MIVEC, but the torque is terribly low due to low boost. I've seen some IXs that only registered 1.1-1.2 bar in stock form. Not all of them see their full boost potential when stock. However, after a flash/mods, they get to where they should be. The MIVEC isn't magically giving the torque spike - it's boost.
I can't believe after I already pointed it out multiple times, you still tried to use that 2nd graph as proof. Can you really not see how the torque is 30 lower than the HP? Does that not register in your mind? Please, try not to regurgitate things that you don't understand like when you once said Al tunes to a 13:1 AFR. Try to actually understand what's happening here...
Originally Posted by evilution310
just for the record, the only 03 and part of 04 evos had the 9.8 housing not 9.5, all the late 04 05 and your 06 have a 10.5 housing.Second a bigger exhaust side dosent allow for quicker spool. Third The compressor housing on the 9 turbos is bigger and your impellar shaft is not titanium. Basically you suck at life.
Also its obvious you have no idea how a turbo works. A bigger exhaust housing does allow the turbo to produce more boost and allow for quicker spool. Did you know any turbine is exhaust driven? Well if a turbo is exhaust driven then guess what drives the turbo? Thats right the exhaust gases do. I mean its sad that you own a turboed car and you dont even know how the freaking thing works. Now on the A/R side its the opposite the bigger the A/R housing the longer its going to take to hit peak boost but when it does hit boost hold god watch out!
Originally Posted by Warrtalon
Good lord, it does not come from the MIVEC. It comes from boost. I don't know why you are so hell-bent on this.
Do you see the graph you posted from Vishnu? Why do you think that IX's torque is so low? It has MIVEC, but the torque is terribly low due to low boost. I've seen some IXs that only registered 1.1-1.2 bar in stock form. Not all of them see their full boost potential when stock. However, after a flash/mods, they get to where they should be. The MIVEC isn't magically giving the torque spike - it's boost.
I can't believe after I already pointed it out multiple times, you still tried to use that 2nd graph as proof. Can you really not see how the torque is 30 lower than the HP? Does that not register in your mind? Please, try not to regurgitate things that you don't understand like when you once said Al tunes to a 13:1 AFR. Try to actually understand what's happening here...
Do you see the graph you posted from Vishnu? Why do you think that IX's torque is so low? It has MIVEC, but the torque is terribly low due to low boost. I've seen some IXs that only registered 1.1-1.2 bar in stock form. Not all of them see their full boost potential when stock. However, after a flash/mods, they get to where they should be. The MIVEC isn't magically giving the torque spike - it's boost.
I can't believe after I already pointed it out multiple times, you still tried to use that 2nd graph as proof. Can you really not see how the torque is 30 lower than the HP? Does that not register in your mind? Please, try not to regurgitate things that you don't understand like when you once said Al tunes to a 13:1 AFR. Try to actually understand what's happening here...
Originally Posted by 4cefedgst
What is "unerstand?" Please, all I'm asking of you is to not use words you can't spell. We've been over this before.
You know you got pwned because every person who does get pwned starts whining about the other persons SPELLING AND GRAMAR this is forum basics 101 I have been here many times and it doesn't surprise me. After a little while you wil start complaining about my grammar and English usage after that fails you will whine to a mod to ban me. This is a classic scenario. Only time will tell bud.
Originally Posted by SKILMATIC
Listen to yourself, you have no inclination on how to even measure a turbos housing let alone knwo the correct measurement. So let me ask you this, do you have a 16g from a 03-04 evo infront of you and if you do where do you start the measurement and where do you end. Please give me specifics. Thanks you.
Also its obvious you have no idea how a turbo works. A bigger exhaust housing does allow the turbo to produce more boost and allow for quicker spool. Did you know any turbine is exhaust driven? Well if a turbo is exhaust driven then guess what drives the turbo? Thats right the exhaust gases do. I mean its sad that you own a turboed car and you dont even know how the freaking thing works. Now on the A/R side its the opposite the bigger the A/R housing the longer its going to take to hit peak boost but when it does hit boost hold god watch out!
Also its obvious you have no idea how a turbo works. A bigger exhaust housing does allow the turbo to produce more boost and allow for quicker spool. Did you know any turbine is exhaust driven? Well if a turbo is exhaust driven then guess what drives the turbo? Thats right the exhaust gases do. I mean its sad that you own a turboed car and you dont even know how the freaking thing works. Now on the A/R side its the opposite the bigger the A/R housing the longer its going to take to hit peak boost but when it does hit boost hold god watch out!
A larger hotside does allow for more boost and for sustaining boost longer, but it does not...I repeat...DOES NOT allow for quicker spool. The smaller hotsides spool quicker, but can't sustain as much boost. Damnation!
And why are you questioning the measurements? Everyone already knows the 03-04 has a 9.8cm^2 while the 05-06 has a 10.5cm^2. This is common, basic knowledge...
Originally Posted by frenchy99
Yes this makes perfect sense.....its not hard to understand. Like it was said earlier If you stick a evo9 turbo on a evo 8, the evo 8 will produce more power. BIGGER TURBO MORE POWER....
Skilmatic STOP THE MADNESS!!
Read http://auto.howstuffworks.com/turbo5.htm
http://www.turbobygarrett.com/turbob...r/faqs.html#t3
Read http://auto.howstuffworks.com/turbo5.htm
http://www.turbobygarrett.com/turbob...r/faqs.html#t3
Last edited by SR20DE-T; Mar 24, 2006 at 05:03 PM.
Originally Posted by Warrtalon
Good lord, it does not come from the MIVEC. It comes from boost. I don't know why you are so hell-bent on this.
Do you see the graph you posted from Vishnu? Why do you think that IX's torque is so low? It has MIVEC, but the torque is terribly low due to low boost. I've seen some IXs that only registered 1.1-1.2 bar in stock form. Not all of them see their full boost potential when stock. However, after a flash/mods, they get to where they should be. The MIVEC isn't magically giving the torque spike - it's boost.
I can't believe after I already pointed it out multiple times, you still tried to use that 2nd graph as proof. Can you really not see how the torque is 30 lower than the HP? Does that not register in your mind? Please, try not to regurgitate things that you don't understand like when you once said Al tunes to a 13:1 AFR. Try to actually understand what's happening here...
Do you see the graph you posted from Vishnu? Why do you think that IX's torque is so low? It has MIVEC, but the torque is terribly low due to low boost. I've seen some IXs that only registered 1.1-1.2 bar in stock form. Not all of them see their full boost potential when stock. However, after a flash/mods, they get to where they should be. The MIVEC isn't magically giving the torque spike - it's boost.
I can't believe after I already pointed it out multiple times, you still tried to use that 2nd graph as proof. Can you really not see how the torque is 30 lower than the HP? Does that not register in your mind? Please, try not to regurgitate things that you don't understand like when you once said Al tunes to a 13:1 AFR. Try to actually understand what's happening here...
1) you don't have a IX
2) you still havent made it to 11's
3) you haven't thought up anymore "packages" to sell
4) all the above
None of what you said matters.
The car went to a dyno, got dynoed, got reflashed and got dynoed again.
It gained 80wtq and thats it. You were saying it didn't and I was saying it did.
On the "when you once said Al tunes to a 13:1 AFR. " quote.
There was a dynoflashed car that got dynoed and had a very big lean spike in the AFR @ 6500RPM. the chart wasn't the greatest and I misread the numbers on the side of the graph, it was a spike to 12.1 not 13.1.. When I notice that I misread the graph, I said I was wrong, apoligized and erased my post.
So STOP bring this **** up. You sound like a whinning girl.
Last edited by Evo_Jay; Mar 24, 2006 at 05:10 PM.
Ok, kid, none of that was relevant, but whatever. I guess I shouldn't expect anything less from you. You're not smart enough to actually analyze the situation. You just see something and spew about it. You have no ability to actually understand what's happening and why things are the way they are. Kinda like reading a chart wrong then going around blasting a tuner for something that isn't true as if you are the authority on the matter. Same thing here with the MIVEC. You don't know anything - you just read and regurgitate the "what" without figuring out the "why."
Yes, that car gained 80wtq. You say it's because of the MIVEC, but then completely ignore the fact that it's stock WTQ was terribly, TERRIBLY low. Was the MIVEC just not working when the car was stock? No, the boost was just low. Think about it...
Yes, that car gained 80wtq. You say it's because of the MIVEC, but then completely ignore the fact that it's stock WTQ was terribly, TERRIBLY low. Was the MIVEC just not working when the car was stock? No, the boost was just low. Think about it...
Originally Posted by Warrtalon
SKILMATIC, please stop. You are so wrong it hurts me to read. Remember when we went through about 10 PMs of you being wrong and me having to do everything possible to get you to realize how wrong you were? Not only was evilution310 correct in everything he said, but I followed up his post by REINFORCING everything he said with even more detail. Please, please stop. All of this stuff we're saying is COMMON KNOWLEDGE ON THE EVO. You just got your Evo and know absolutely NOTHING ABOUT IT YET, so please stop talking about things you don't know.
A larger hotside does allow for more boost and for sustaining boost longer, but it does not...I repeat...DOES NOT allow for quicker spool. The smaller hotsides spool quicker, but can't sustain as much boost. Damnation!
And why are you questioning the measurements? Everyone already knows the 03-04 has a 9.8cm^2 while the 05-06 has a 10.5cm^2. This is common, basic knowledge...
A larger hotside does allow for more boost and for sustaining boost longer, but it does not...I repeat...DOES NOT allow for quicker spool. The smaller hotsides spool quicker, but can't sustain as much boost. Damnation!
And why are you questioning the measurements? Everyone already knows the 03-04 has a 9.8cm^2 while the 05-06 has a 10.5cm^2. This is common, basic knowledge...
WARR, you are the shiznit I am not going to argue with you because you help people out to save money and time. You have helpmed me out alot with modification choices and you have been one of the few people here who have proved themselves.
I WOULD RECOMMEND EVERYONE ON THIS FORUM WHETHOR YOU BELEIVE YOUR RIGHT OR NOT DO NOT I REPEAT DO NOT ARGUE WITH THIS GUY!!!!!!!!!
HE IS THE REAL DEAL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Originally Posted by Evo_Kid
Your just mad like always. Is it because.....
1) you don't have a IX
2) you still havent made it to 11's
3) you haven't thought up anymore "packages" to sell
4) all the above
None of what you said matters.
The car went to a dyno, got dynoed, got reflashed and got dynoed again.
It gained 80wtq and thats it. You were saying it didn't and I was saying it did.
On the "when you once said Al tunes to a 13:1 AFR. " quote.
There was a dynoflashed car that got dynoed and had a very big lean spike in the AFR @ 6500RPM. the chart wasn't the greatest and I misread the numbers on the side of the graph, it was a spike to 12.1 not 13.1.. When I notice that I misread the graph, I said I was wrong, apoligized and erased my post.
So STOP bring this **** up. You sound like a whinning girl.
1) you don't have a IX
2) you still havent made it to 11's
3) you haven't thought up anymore "packages" to sell
4) all the above
None of what you said matters.
The car went to a dyno, got dynoed, got reflashed and got dynoed again.
It gained 80wtq and thats it. You were saying it didn't and I was saying it did.
On the "when you once said Al tunes to a 13:1 AFR. " quote.
There was a dynoflashed car that got dynoed and had a very big lean spike in the AFR @ 6500RPM. the chart wasn't the greatest and I misread the numbers on the side of the graph, it was a spike to 12.1 not 13.1.. When I notice that I misread the graph, I said I was wrong, apoligized and erased my post.
So STOP bring this **** up. You sound like a whinning girl.
LISTEN I DONT CARE WHAT YOUR ARGUMENT IS. DO NOT ARGUE WITH WARRTALON!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
IF IT WASNT FOR PEOPLE LIKE HIM ALOT OF EVO OWNERS WOULD BE WAISTING THEIR MONEY. AND THAT IS SOMEONE I RESPECT!!!!!!!!!!!!
Originally Posted by Warrtalon
Ok, kid, none of that was relevant, but whatever. I guess I shouldn't expect anything less from you. You're not smart enough to actually analyze the situation. You just see something and spew about it. You have no ability to actually understand what's happening and why things are the way they are. Kinda like reading a chart wrong then going around blasting a tuner for something that isn't true as if you are the authority on the matter. Same thing here with the MIVEC. You don't know anything - you just read and regurgitate the "what" without figuring out the "why."
Yes, that car gained 80wtq. You say it's because of the MIVEC, but then completely ignore the fact that it's stock WTQ was terribly, TERRIBLY low. Was the MIVEC just not working when the car was stock? No, the boost was just low. Think about it...
Yes, that car gained 80wtq. You say it's because of the MIVEC, but then completely ignore the fact that it's stock WTQ was terribly, TERRIBLY low. Was the MIVEC just not working when the car was stock? No, the boost was just low. Think about it...
Other people know stuff and have experiance too. I know exactly how an engine works very well. I work on cars (EVO, WRX, DSM, hondas) all the time, actully its all I do, besides read. And I don't just read from this forum, I read from many sources and am always learning and working on cars, figuring stuff out. I know the why , how & what.
Last edited by Evo_Jay; Mar 24, 2006 at 05:18 PM.







