Notices
Evo General Discuss any generalized technical Evo related topics that may not fit into the other forums. Please do not post tech and rumor threads here.
Sponsored by: RavSpec - JDM Wheels Central

evo VIII vs evo IX

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 11, 2006 | 07:25 PM
  #16  
CarbonWorks's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 50
Likes: 0
From: mass
one thing is long run 8 is better off then the 9 becouse the lack of magniment systems.
Reply
Old Nov 11, 2006 | 08:56 PM
  #17  
Turd Squirter's Avatar
Account Disabled
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 773
Likes: 0
From: Livermore, CA
Maybe it's the difference in gearing that threw off your frame of reference. The MPH "sweet spots" are slightly different between the VIII and IX. Not by a lot but there are some changes to the gearing.

All I can say is put that same TBE and a tune on your buddy's IX and you'll be a believer.
Reply
Old Nov 11, 2006 | 09:31 PM
  #18  
illegalplume's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
From: sactown
the IX's are way deeper stock for stock because the IX hotside on the turbo is 10.5 where the XIII are 9.8...and i have a IX w TBE and reflash and i ran 12.2 at the track and the evo XIII there was hitting 13.1 with the same modds...Variable valve timing is godd!!!!!
Reply
Old Nov 11, 2006 | 09:44 PM
  #19  
VIIImylunch's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 263
Likes: 0
From: utah
remember the 05 evos have the 10.5 hotside
Reply
Old Nov 11, 2006 | 10:00 PM
  #20  
EVO8URV8's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 428
Likes: 0
From: District 9
Originally Posted by VIIImylunch
remember the 05 evos have the 10.5 hotside
Ya, tell them to not to forget that 05s got 10.5 hotside
Reply
Old Nov 11, 2006 | 10:44 PM
  #21  
Jax419's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 1,168
Likes: 1
From: Lakeview, Chicago
My IX is pretty damn lound for a stock exhaust...when I put a cat-back on it wasnt that much louder.
Reply
Old Nov 11, 2006 | 11:19 PM
  #22  
donmeca2020's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 4,514
Likes: 0
From: Hollywood,florida
as much as everyone hypes up the 9 and its "MIVEC" i dont beleive there is truly that much of a difference performance wise. yes i know the 9s are easier somewhat to obtain 300hp easily but stock for stock mod for mod i believe its truly a drivers race.
Reply
Old Nov 11, 2006 | 11:35 PM
  #23  
EvoRecordSetter's Avatar
Evolved Member
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,123
Likes: 0
From: Seattle
it has a lot to due with driver. stock for stock, a IX doesnt have enuf power to make a ****ty driver beat a good driver in a 8. you really start to notice the difference in power when going mod for mod, 8 vs 9.
Reply
Old Nov 11, 2006 | 11:39 PM
  #24  
EvoRecordSetter's Avatar
Evolved Member
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,123
Likes: 0
From: Seattle
btw. mivec does sound cool
Reply
Old Nov 12, 2006 | 12:46 PM
  #25  
illegalplume's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
From: sactown
MIVEC is what will make the worse driver be able to make a little more mistakes and still win lol stock for stock it reves better and mod for mod slowly but surely the MIVEC will be better. also when you get into the like 400+ WHP its easier to controll ping and stuff for a overall safer setup.(i just cant wait for David Buchur to get one!!)
Reply
Old Nov 12, 2006 | 04:03 PM
  #26  
eficker's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (19)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 229
Likes: 1
From: Provo
mivec ftw!
Reply
Old Nov 12, 2006 | 04:21 PM
  #27  
badhabit90's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 1,424
Likes: 0
From: central coast CA
you didnt mention that if his car was "broken in" yet.

your car has plenty of break in time, while his does not. things will seat in after time and an increase in ring seal may help his performance AFTER he is past his initial break in time.
Reply
Old Nov 19, 2006 | 03:32 PM
  #28  
evotico's Avatar
Newbie
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 93
Likes: 0
From: Tampa, FL
So the ix has 10.5 hotside and MIVEC. The cams are different also correct me if I am wrong.
Reply
Old Nov 19, 2006 | 03:35 PM
  #29  
UpstateEVOVIII's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 393
Likes: 0
From: in denial.
I owned an 05 VIII GSR SSL and now have a IX MR SE. The VIII may "feel" a bit faster because the boost doesn't taper off as much and the power band is shorter and more abrupt. The IX powerband, even though there is slightly more boost taper due to the increased compression of the MIVEC, is much wider and smoother. IX is a much better car to drive, and is without a doubt faster stock vs stock vs an VIII.
Reply
Old Nov 19, 2006 | 03:36 PM
  #30  
Warrtalon's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 20,790
Likes: 2
From: Long Island, NY
Originally Posted by evotico
So the ix has 10.5 hotside and MIVEC. The cams are different also correct me if I am wrong.
Not sure how I missed this thread, but there are some newbies throwing out terrible info.

Evotico, yes, the IX has a 10.5 hotside, but so did all of the 05s. The main difference in the IX's turbo is the larger compressor housing. The MIVEC helps, and that is the "difference in cams," but there are also coolant passages in the head that allow for more boost for a given octane.

Donmeca, IXs make _A LOT_ more power both in stock form and with mods, especially with mods. There is an upper limit where the power evens out, but with stg1 mods, there is no comparison, and it's not a driver's race in most cases.
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 12:25 PM.