View Poll Results: Waste of money?
Yes



75
27.99%
No



193
72.01%
Voters: 268. You may not vote on this poll
Mini Batteries... Are they Garbage? Waste of Money?
When you disconnected it, did you remove it? If so, did you set it on your garage floor?
I have found, for whatever reason, if you set an automotive battery on the concrete floor for a week, it will kill it.
I have found, for whatever reason, if you set an automotive battery on the concrete floor for a week, it will kill it.
Check out Braille batteries. I have had mine for over two years and two winters with sub freezing temps and it starts every time. Plus it has more cold cranking amps than most "top of the line" standard batterys. Weighs only 11lbs!! And can be mounted vertically or horizontally!!
As a side note before we get too excited about 'shifting weight distribution', let's look at the numbers:
Car: ~3,520lbs.
Dist: ~60/40 (f/r)
Before relocation
=> front weight = 2,112lbs
=> rear weight = 1,408lbs
After relocation, assume the entire weight of battery goes on the rear axle. Assume battery weight = 20lbs.
=> front weight = 2,112 - 20 = 2,092lbs
=> rear weight = 1,428lbs
"Shifted" weight distribution = 59.4/40.6
So, we're going from 60/40 to 59.4/40.6. Is anyone going to really say they can detect a difference between the two?
Obviously, if you are doing it for other reasons, then go right ahead. But if you are looking at shifting weight distribution, it's a bit optimistic.
Car: ~3,520lbs.
Dist: ~60/40 (f/r)
Before relocation
=> front weight = 2,112lbs
=> rear weight = 1,408lbs
After relocation, assume the entire weight of battery goes on the rear axle. Assume battery weight = 20lbs.
=> front weight = 2,112 - 20 = 2,092lbs
=> rear weight = 1,428lbs
"Shifted" weight distribution = 59.4/40.6
So, we're going from 60/40 to 59.4/40.6. Is anyone going to really say they can detect a difference between the two?
Obviously, if you are doing it for other reasons, then go right ahead. But if you are looking at shifting weight distribution, it's a bit optimistic.
I don't agree. Doing the math on the battery relocation is different than actually moving it and watching what it does to the corner weighting on the scales. The battery is not in the center of the car which is what you are working in your math, it also isn't directly over either axle, it is either in front of one or behind one. Math is fine, but you have to use all the facts, placement, distance and leverage. Your simple formula isn't cutting it.
We were the first to build a mini-battery kit, the very few I/C pipes kits that were offered when the EVO came to the states all used the stock routing, which sucked. So I did the battery kits to makes room and make much shorter/more direct plumbing.
The battery kit is one of the best things to do to the engine bay for a good look. Ours looses almost 20 pounds. We offer a 1 year warranty on the battery. The mount we use is up to standards for racing as a matter of fact we were complimented by the NASA officials twice now on how nice it is.
If you want to move the battery to the rear we have a kick *** billet aluminium mount for putting a battery in the trunk. I have 1 or 2 of these left and when they are gone they are gone for good.
Moving a battery to the rear, for an example, in a Buick Gran National is like setting the engine back 6". That is a big effect.
We were the first to build a mini-battery kit, the very few I/C pipes kits that were offered when the EVO came to the states all used the stock routing, which sucked. So I did the battery kits to makes room and make much shorter/more direct plumbing.
The battery kit is one of the best things to do to the engine bay for a good look. Ours looses almost 20 pounds. We offer a 1 year warranty on the battery. The mount we use is up to standards for racing as a matter of fact we were complimented by the NASA officials twice now on how nice it is.
If you want to move the battery to the rear we have a kick *** billet aluminium mount for putting a battery in the trunk. I have 1 or 2 of these left and when they are gone they are gone for good.
Moving a battery to the rear, for an example, in a Buick Gran National is like setting the engine back 6". That is a big effect.
Originally Posted by davidbuschur
I don't agree. Doing the math on the battery relocation is different than actually moving it and watching what it does to the corner weighting on the scales. The battery is not in the center of the car which is what you are working in your math, it also isn't directly over either axle, it is either in front of one or behind one. Math is fine, but you have to use all the facts, placement, distance and leverage. Your simple formula isn't cutting it.
From the perspective of side-side distirbution, if you are free to move it to anywhere you please, then obviously this will have a more significant effect on the L/R weights as you can literally go +/-20lbs or so on each wheel. Unfortunately, this can only work to full effect on the rear but it works nonetheless. I really should have been more specific and said that my post commented only on f/r distribution. The l/r weights is a valid point, but I don't think it has been mentioned on this thread. Thanks for pointing that out.
Originally Posted by davidbuschur
We were the first to build a mini-battery kit, the very few I/C pipes kits that were offered when the EVO came to the states all used the stock routing, which sucked. So I did the battery kits to makes room and make much shorter/more direct plumbing.
If you want to move the battery to the rear we have a kick *** billet aluminium mount for putting a battery in the trunk. I have 1 or 2 of these left and when they are gone they are gone for good.
If you want to move the battery to the rear we have a kick *** billet aluminium mount for putting a battery in the trunk. I have 1 or 2 of these left and when they are gone they are gone for good.
Originally Posted by davidbuschur
Moving a battery to the rear, for an example, in a Buick Gran National is like setting the engine back 6". That is a big effect.
I do believe though that if people experience improvement in terms of handling it perhaps come from other effects. I would think that the battery being high up, reducing its weight or having it in the trunk in a lower position than stock perhaps helps with roll (lowered center of mass, specially on/near the front axle). If Mitsu went thorugh all the trouble of putting on an aluminium roof and hood, I think perhaps there's something there.
I would say the stock radio would not harm the mini battery kit if you ran it for an hour, the stock radio doesn't pull many amps.
The picture above would have a big effect on the corner weights of the car. As far to the left as it can go and as far back.
The picture above would have a big effect on the corner weights of the car. As far to the left as it can go and as far back.
Just for the record, it is -1*F this morning here in MN, -16*F with windchill. I have the buschur mini battery kit, and the car cranked right over, no problem! Started right up. I was reeeeaaaaally hesitant when ordering, but Jarrod assured me that it they had a ton of customers w/ the same battery and zero issues. I went with it, but keep my stock battery close by, just in case. Haven't needed it yet!
I am going to be putting a sound system in the car very soon and was wondering if i should get an Odyssey Mini under the engine bay or relocate a full-size battery to the trunk?
Anyone have suggestions? i just want to make sure that every time i turn the key, the car will start with no problems and so i can sit in the car every now and then with the key in IGN and listen to music or watch a movie.....
Anyone have suggestions? i just want to make sure that every time i turn the key, the car will start with no problems and so i can sit in the car every now and then with the key in IGN and listen to music or watch a movie.....


