Evo VIII vs Evo IX with dyno graphs!
Evolved Member
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 3,783
Likes: 0
From: Diamond Bar, California
I didn't know it was going to be a dynapack, I thought you said it was going to be a DD dyno? Oh well doesn't really matter. Yeah he should be about a 320-340whp, maybe more or maybe less.
You see there is the difference, you made 305whp/300wtq on a dynapack, which is pretty good for a 05 VIII, it seems your pretty happy with the results. If he turns out to only make 305/300wtq also, he should be pretty disappointed and rightfully so.
You see there is the difference, you made 305whp/300wtq on a dynapack, which is pretty good for a 05 VIII, it seems your pretty happy with the results. If he turns out to only make 305/300wtq also, he should be pretty disappointed and rightfully so.
And for the Torque hater it went peak 306-ish to 176ish at 6800rpms. the curve looks so dramatic due to the inflated numbers on the graph if it was 325down to 0the curve would be much less pronounced and drastic.
Newbie
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
From: Park City, UT
Dynapack dynos are erratic, the car probably doesn't lose that much power from 5k to redline.
Also, at altitude you can't push turbos out of their efficiency range as much as you could at sea level.
Nice numbers, but wish you could have gotten a better measurment of torque.
Also, at altitude you can't push turbos out of their efficiency range as much as you could at sea level.
Nice numbers, but wish you could have gotten a better measurment of torque.
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (7)
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 1,117
Likes: 1
From: Los Angeles, CA
i don't have my IX dyno charts but they are consideratly different than yours.
Power is smooth as a butt and doesn't drop...just continues until redline.
306hp at around 7000rpm.
I had peak torque about 3700rpm and it declined at a very gradual slope. Not nearly as dramatic as yours.
Power is smooth as a butt and doesn't drop...just continues until redline.
306hp at around 7000rpm.
I had peak torque about 3700rpm and it declined at a very gradual slope. Not nearly as dramatic as yours.
I didn't know it was going to be a dynapack, I thought you said it was going to be a DD dyno? Oh well doesn't really matter. Yeah he should be about a 320-340whp, maybe more or maybe less.
You see there is the difference, you made 305whp/300wtq on a dynapack, which is pretty good for a 05 VIII, it seems your pretty happy with the results. If he turns out to only make 305/300wtq also, he should be pretty disappointed and rightfully so.
You see there is the difference, you made 305whp/300wtq on a dynapack, which is pretty good for a 05 VIII, it seems your pretty happy with the results. If he turns out to only make 305/300wtq also, he should be pretty disappointed and rightfully so.
yah your right
This is not true, the MR and the RS do not have the same turbo, The MR turbo has a different wheel
Newbie
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 81
Likes: 0
From: Utah
Hi everyone, just letting you know that i'm the one with the IX that will be compared to the VIII. I talked to the tuner yesterday and unforunately he will be out of town for the next two weeks. As soon as he gets back I will have my car tuned and dyno'd and will post the charts as soon as I get them.
Evolving Member
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 366
Likes: 0
From: Dubai, UAE
Please people. Stop posting these things unless you're 100% sure it's accurate. It's bad enough when people on other message boards think the MR is faster than the other Evos, but on here? Come on.
http://www.mitsubishicars.com/MMNA/j...en-us#specsTab
Last edited by Steiner; Mar 3, 2007 at 01:50 PM.
