Notices
Evo General Discuss any generalized technical Evo related topics that may not fit into the other forums. Please do not post tech and rumor threads here.
Sponsored by: RavSpec - JDM Wheels Central

Methods of Reducing Rotating Mass Weight

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 30, 2007 | 01:28 PM
  #46  
hotrod2448's Avatar
Evolved Member
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 2,815
Likes: 24
From: Davidson, NC
Originally Posted by Kevin Knight
why do u care about the weight again, just make the B!tch faster and dont worry about the weight.
Losing rotating weight is part of making it faster.
Reply
Old Apr 30, 2007 | 02:31 PM
  #47  
_EVOlved_'s Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 1,327
Likes: 1
From: Addison, IL
+1
Reply
Old Apr 30, 2007 | 03:36 PM
  #48  
Jasil's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (22)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 2,327
Likes: 1
From: NO
It's just alot easier to make power than drop weight that's the issue not too mention much much cheaper.

Once you put on a TBE, suspension, lightweight seats, f/rear support beams, lightweight battery, some 2pc brakes, MR or other lighter than stock rims you can get a EVO sub 3000lbs.

When you start talking AMS RR stroker, carbon driveshaft, Tilton Carbon/Carbon that's almost 15k right there for just 3 things.
Reply
Old Apr 30, 2007 | 03:48 PM
  #49  
tabio42's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (15)
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 443
Likes: 0
Reducing rotational mass makes your car handle better as well. More power is not a substitute for better handling unfortunately. (Or the GT500 mustang wouldn't be the biggest POS car in the world)
Reply
Old Apr 30, 2007 | 03:59 PM
  #50  
Vigo's Avatar
Account Disabled
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 2,001
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by Jasil
It's just alot easier to make power than drop weight that's the issue not too mention much much cheaper.

Once you put on a TBE, suspension, lightweight seats, f/rear support beams, lightweight battery, some 2pc brakes, MR or other lighter than stock rims you can get a EVO sub 3000lbs.

When you start talking AMS RR stroker, carbon driveshaft, Tilton Carbon/Carbon that's almost 15k right there for just 3 things.
If the person is really into reducing rotating mass it will not matter how much it will cost to him. It is up to him if it's worth it or not. Every little bit helps in terms of making something faster.

Lets say you have all the power mods and the other guy has all the mods you have, but he has done every single rotating mass reduction or even just some rotating mass reduction. Ask yourself who will win in that scenario. I will guarantee you will lose, because the other guy will have more power to the wheels and has better handling.
Reply
Old Apr 30, 2007 | 08:19 PM
  #51  
_EVOlved_'s Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 1,327
Likes: 1
From: Addison, IL
Thats my scenario. I have all the mods i want and am looking to make it faster other than performance...
Reply
Old Apr 30, 2007 | 10:13 PM
  #52  
_EVOlved_'s Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 1,327
Likes: 1
From: Addison, IL
So does anyone know what the factor is for rotating compared to stationary mass weight? Was it x4 or x8 or what?

Also, is unsprung weight just weight sitting there and not needed (such a the spare in your trunk for example) or is it something else?
Reply
Old Apr 30, 2007 | 10:15 PM
  #53  
ambystom01's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 15,634
Likes: 75
From: Canuckistan
From my understanding unsprung weight is weight that is not "controlled" by the spring for lack of a better word. So this would be tires, rims, brakes, etc..
Reply
Old Apr 30, 2007 | 10:20 PM
  #54  
_EVOlved_'s Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 1,327
Likes: 1
From: Addison, IL
So strictly suspension?
Reply
Old Apr 30, 2007 | 10:25 PM
  #55  
ambystom01's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 15,634
Likes: 75
From: Canuckistan
I think so.
Reply
Old Apr 30, 2007 | 10:46 PM
  #56  
_EVOlved_'s Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 1,327
Likes: 1
From: Addison, IL
Thanks...

Any more input on that or the correction factor?
Reply
Old Apr 30, 2007 | 10:56 PM
  #57  
petey pab's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 946
Likes: 1
From: Jackson, CA (NorCal, Sacramento)
rotational mass is 8 lbs for every 1 lb of sprung weight. and unsprung weight is basically suspension components.
Reply
Old Apr 30, 2007 | 11:05 PM
  #58  
_EVOlved_'s Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 1,327
Likes: 1
From: Addison, IL
Very good. Ive heard 8 pounds and 4 pounds.

So we can all agree thats its 8?
Reply
Old Apr 30, 2007 | 11:10 PM
  #59  
yellance's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 395
Likes: 0
From: Texas
as for brake rotors there is a company on the east coast that makes them out of titanium yes it is quite a penny my buddy did it on his track honda along with the aluminum calipers and unsprung about 30lbs per wheel it was 2k in all but well worth it
Reply
Old Apr 30, 2007 | 11:23 PM
  #60  
petey pab's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 946
Likes: 1
From: Jackson, CA (NorCal, Sacramento)
Originally Posted by _EVOlved_
Very good. Ive heard 8 pounds and 4 pounds.

So we can all agree thats its 8?
well, its not really exact but its just a general idea. and that is only for rotational mass. you can also think of it as removing 100 lbs from the car equates to nearly .1 seconds in the 1/4 mile. so if you change wheels/tires to a set that is 3.5 lbs less per wheel, that would equal .1 off.
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 06:47 AM.