Methods of Reducing Rotating Mass Weight
It's just alot easier to make power than drop weight that's the issue not too mention much much cheaper.
Once you put on a TBE, suspension, lightweight seats, f/rear support beams, lightweight battery, some 2pc brakes, MR or other lighter than stock rims you can get a EVO sub 3000lbs.
When you start talking AMS RR stroker, carbon driveshaft, Tilton Carbon/Carbon that's almost 15k right there for just 3 things.
Once you put on a TBE, suspension, lightweight seats, f/rear support beams, lightweight battery, some 2pc brakes, MR or other lighter than stock rims you can get a EVO sub 3000lbs.
When you start talking AMS RR stroker, carbon driveshaft, Tilton Carbon/Carbon that's almost 15k right there for just 3 things.
Reducing rotational mass makes your car handle better as well. More power is not a substitute for better handling unfortunately. (Or the GT500 mustang wouldn't be the biggest POS car in the world)
It's just alot easier to make power than drop weight that's the issue not too mention much much cheaper.
Once you put on a TBE, suspension, lightweight seats, f/rear support beams, lightweight battery, some 2pc brakes, MR or other lighter than stock rims you can get a EVO sub 3000lbs.
When you start talking AMS RR stroker, carbon driveshaft, Tilton Carbon/Carbon that's almost 15k right there for just 3 things.
Once you put on a TBE, suspension, lightweight seats, f/rear support beams, lightweight battery, some 2pc brakes, MR or other lighter than stock rims you can get a EVO sub 3000lbs.
When you start talking AMS RR stroker, carbon driveshaft, Tilton Carbon/Carbon that's almost 15k right there for just 3 things.
Lets say you have all the power mods and the other guy has all the mods you have, but he has done every single rotating mass reduction or even just some rotating mass reduction. Ask yourself who will win in that scenario. I will guarantee you will lose, because the other guy will have more power to the wheels and has better handling.
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (12)
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 1,327
Likes: 1
From: Addison, IL
So does anyone know what the factor is for rotating compared to stationary mass weight? Was it x4 or x8 or what?
Also, is unsprung weight just weight sitting there and not needed (such a the spare in your trunk for example) or is it something else?
Also, is unsprung weight just weight sitting there and not needed (such a the spare in your trunk for example) or is it something else?
as for brake rotors there is a company on the east coast that makes them out of titanium yes it is quite a penny my buddy did it on his track honda along with the aluminum calipers and unsprung about 30lbs per wheel it was 2k in all but well worth it
Evolved Member
iTrader: (18)
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 946
Likes: 1
From: Jackson, CA (NorCal, Sacramento)
well, its not really exact but its just a general idea. and that is only for rotational mass. you can also think of it as removing 100 lbs from the car equates to nearly .1 seconds in the 1/4 mile. so if you change wheels/tires to a set that is 3.5 lbs less per wheel, that would equal .1 off.


