Notices
Evo General Discuss any generalized technical Evo related topics that may not fit into the other forums. Please do not post tech and rumor threads here.
Sponsored by: RavSpec - JDM Wheels Central

G TECH performance meter Pro HP reader?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 12, 2007 | 09:17 PM
  #1  
el producto's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 656
Likes: 0
From: MA
G TECH performance meter Pro HP reader?

Hey everyone, I recently got my hands on this G force meter that says it can accurately measure horsepower, 1/4 mile time and 0-60 time. I mounted on my front windshield I entered 3300lbs for the weight and went on the highway to test it out..apparently it said I had 328whp

Just curious how accurate these things are..I think pretty accurate considering the mods I have.What do you think? It says on the box thats its true whp considering you're really on the road during it.
Reply
Old May 12, 2007 | 09:33 PM
  #2  
evo8426's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (27)
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 4,248
Likes: 9
From: Charlotte, North Carolina
what was your 1/4?
Reply
Old May 12, 2007 | 09:48 PM
  #3  
el producto's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 656
Likes: 0
From: MA
I'll have to try it again for the 1/4 mile time, but If you do set It for 1/4 mile time and 0-60 you have to go thru most the gears anyway..so Im not gonna turn my local roads into a race track..
Reply
Old May 12, 2007 | 10:01 PM
  #4  
72Tornado's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 698
Likes: 3
From: Bay Area, CA
I wouldn't put much tooo stock in the WHP measurements it gives, but I know for a fact that the 0-60 times and 1/4 ETs will be very close indeed. You'll trap high just because it will give you instantaneous speed @ 1/4-mile, as opposed to the track where it averages the last 100', but even with the old ones the ET was accurate within a couple tenths.

The HP is probably a decent estimate, but no more accurate than an educated guess based on your mods would be.
Reply
Old May 12, 2007 | 10:06 PM
  #5  
94AWDcoupe's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (125)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 4,837
Likes: 30
From: Tampa
you could take your car to ten different dynos on the same day. you would get ten different hp readings. I would say the g-tech is as accurate as any dyno is.
Reply
Old May 12, 2007 | 10:37 PM
  #6  
joah1660's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 138
Likes: 0
From: Texas
like the one guy said, just a good gestimate
Reply
Old May 13, 2007 | 01:58 AM
  #7  
urslo4n8's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 609
Likes: 1
From: Long Island, NY (Hurry up and wait)
Ok check it out. I have the same meter and posted something similar. The way this meter works is; its taking all considerations into giving you that number such as wind resistance, etc. And the number youre gonna get is REAR WHEEL horsepower which will always be lower than crank or something you might see on a real dyno. It explains this well in the owners manual. Exact weight will be neccesary for a close result.
Reply
Old May 13, 2007 | 05:23 AM
  #8  
IfDontFITsPIT's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 169
Likes: 0
From: Mililani, HI
anything is better than a butt dyno I guess...
Reply
Old May 13, 2007 | 05:30 AM
  #9  
Jakeg97's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (56)
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 11,132
Likes: 1
From: Western NY
i think its a waste of money
Reply
Old May 13, 2007 | 07:54 AM
  #10  
k270kmh's Avatar
Evolved Member
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,041
Likes: 1
My G-Tech is the RR version, you can choose the number of cylinders, awd or fwd or rwd etc... you can analyze the files in your PC.
By the way, 3300lbs seems excessive.
Reply
Old May 13, 2007 | 03:56 PM
  #11  
el producto's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 656
Likes: 0
From: MA
Well I got it for free from this guy who drags really fast mustangs so I didnt pay a dime.

This one is an older version, but I am pretty happy with the number so since its 330rwhp I'd say I have about 300-310awhp...still happy.
Reply
Old May 13, 2007 | 05:12 PM
  #12  
greentrbo95gst's Avatar
Newbie
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 63
Likes: 0
From: bay area
it's a huge waste of money
Reply
Old May 13, 2007 | 05:19 PM
  #13  
el producto's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 656
Likes: 0
From: MA
again i got it for free so i could care less what you think about..nice 2 posts...
Reply
Old May 21, 2007 | 08:58 PM
  #14  
frost318's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (15)
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 166
Likes: 0
From: Louisiana
I have one.i dont know how accurate it is. I ran 13.3 with just TBE does that sound right??
Reply
Old May 21, 2007 | 09:06 PM
  #15  
jenx1976's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 259
Likes: 0
From: Fallon NV, Bellingham WA, Angeles City PI
i got the rr version, i could never get any close hp readings.... sometimes it'll be 240 then other times 270....one time i got 600!!!! WTF???? anyways, got my car dynoed and got 320 whp.
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 04:42 PM.