Notices
Evo General Discuss any generalized technical Evo related topics that may not fit into the other forums. Please do not post tech and rumor threads here.
Sponsored by: RavSpec - JDM Wheels Central

The Freak Evo from SAUDI ARABIA (caution LS1 Inside )

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 18, 2007 | 04:10 PM
  #271  
72Tornado's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 698
Likes: 3
From: Bay Area, CA
Originally Posted by sonicnofadz
All you can say is that power / liter doesn't matter and what really matters is fuel mileage? Wow. Just wow. I guess you are better off driving an Toyota Prius. Yep, we are definitely the ones that are ignorant.
Well, I did say that I wouldn't post again unless someone said something as foolish as C5's being glorified Cavaliers...so here goes.

Apparently you can't read any better than the SRT-4 guy. Either that, or the fact that you can't come up with any argument to refute me leaves you resorting to personal insults again...which seems more likely. I never said what matters is fuel mileage, and you'd have to truly be an idiot to get that impression from my posts. What matters is power, responsiveness and ease of installation regarding mods, efficiency, cost, maintenance, and size. Hang on a minute, that's exactly what I've been saying all along, as well as the post you quoted! Shocking! And yet you claim that "all I can say" is what matters is fuel mileage. Laughable at best. I was pointing out that GM's OHV motors achieve as good or better fuel mileage while making nearly twice as much power as the 4G. Obviously, you lack the reading skills to understand that, which is why I've gotten tired of this thread.

I can clearly see where you get the Prius comment though, given that my past two vehicles have been an LS1 Z28 and a 72 Stingray

Any idiot can realize that output will decrease as displacement increases? This is why Honda's F20C specific output is double that of the LS-1? I seriously doubt that specific output will decrease by that much with the addition of 3.7 liters. I think this is just an excuse the pushrod jarheads make to explain the crappy specific output of their rickety V8's. In reality, I have seen with my own two eyes a Ford naturally aspirated 4.6L 32V make over 500hp. Don't believe me? Check out svtperformance.com What did you say about specific output again? Yeah I didn't think so.
What about specific output? How about a 600hp STOCK DISPLACEMENT LS1? Don't believe me?

http://www.rose-tech.com/pubstuff/148-0508-LS12.pdf

Oh no, you've been proved wrong yet again. In any case, this is an irrelevant argument. You'll rarely see an engine of that power output with that specific output put into production, for a variety of reasons that stem back to the fact that specific output generally decreases as displacement increases, all other things equal. Cars that may have engines like that are going to be expensive indeed. Specific output is just an excuse ricers and the ignorant use to combat the low ABSOLUTE output of their torqueless 4-bangers.

Oh, and in any case, I thought I'd let you know that the Z08 Corvette - what will be one step above the Z06, but not at the level of the supercar SS - will be sporting a ~635hp 6.2L OHV N/A V8. That car will probably be around $100,000.

Anyway, I'm done - I'll let you carry on with your idiocy and selective reading.

Originally Posted by Sxhawnn
this argument is too technically complicated for me. Does this type of argument even matter when it comes to owning a car that you love? Can't we just appreciate that an evo owner did something new? What does it matters whats more efficient.... the engines are just too different for this argument of whats better. I like the pull in my evo but I can also appreciate a ride in my uncles 69 charger... Can't we just leave it at that?
Well said mate. I can appreciate different engine designs, and I also understand the distinct advantages and disadvantages of each. Unfortunately, others in the Evo community are too busy nutswinging to understand the inherent advantages of different technologies.

Last edited by 72Tornado; Jun 19, 2007 at 08:22 AM.
Reply
Old Jun 18, 2007 | 04:20 PM
  #272  
dzraduzit's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 138
Likes: 0
From: ATX
Originally Posted by Vigo
Forced induction and technology is not a replacement for displacement. It's a crutch for a low displacement motor that does not have enough displacement to produce power and torque in a naturally aspirated form.

It's a fact that a higher displacement motor with forced induction has higher potential for top end power, because it will have the ability to spool a bigger turbo compared to a smaller engine. Add in some technology into the equation with big displacement and forced induction you will have even more power.

With more displacement you will have more power and torque all throughout the power band. Everybody should know and agree to that, unless you are stupid.
Well said!
Reply
Old Jun 18, 2007 | 06:29 PM
  #273  
DeFiant1's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
From: Rockford, IL
I agree. This is the first evo engine swap I've ever heard of. It' awesome that it's possible, but it's almost a sacrilege. I love the 4G63. The only thing better would be one from the evo X. +1 for effort
Reply
Old Jun 18, 2007 | 07:26 PM
  #274  
PMPN8EZ's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 128
Likes: 0
From: Michigun
What happened to this thread? It started out pretty good.
Reply
Old Jun 18, 2007 | 09:02 PM
  #275  
LT1runner's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 669
Likes: 0
From: Nashville Metro
Originally Posted by sonicnofadz
Ford has already learned its lesson with pushrods, and thats why they no longer use OHV engines (at least not in the mustangs). GM will soon learn the same lesson. Honestly, just take a look at all the leading auto manufacturers.
WRONG!!

The only reason they went to the 4.6 is due to gas mileage and emissions. If ford thought they could continue to run the 5.0 they would have. People will deal with the 4.6 sure, but ford doesn't have the R&D to continue to put OHV motors out and continue to meet EPA standards and still increase in HP. But hey, continue to be a fan boy with your head in the sand. I've beat my fare share of LT1 and LSx series cars, but they aren't doing nearly the amount of stuff a modded evo does. Destroke an LS1 give it proportionally the same size turbo to motor ratio, and see and car get waxed by "old technology" Or simply take the turbo off an evo, raise the compression to 10.5 to 1, and run an LS1 car, and be prepared to be waxed. If turbo technology can improve, why not OHV tech. Turbos are super old too, but we still use them.
Reply
Old Jun 18, 2007 | 09:27 PM
  #276  
threepointsix's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 356
Likes: 0
From: S. Houston ClearLake
RS6 Audi has a 420hp V8 & AWD, guess an Evo can too! All it takes is money....no shortage of cash over there. The aluminum LSX probably doesnt weigh much more than the 4G/snail and a big battery. Im thinking Garret67 out back remote mounted no intercooler
Reply
Old Jun 19, 2007 | 07:04 AM
  #277  
James's Avatar
Evolved Member
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 520
Likes: 1
From: NC
I don't really know what happend to the ls1 evo b/c the last, I think, 4- 6 pages have been 2-3 or maybe four ppl talking nothing about the ls1 evo. So I just kinda skipped through the last couple of pages.
Can't wait to see a video on this evo, or something.
Reply
Old Jun 19, 2007 | 07:32 AM
  #278  
houston999's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iWW0-gQMWCc
Reply
Old Jun 19, 2007 | 08:33 AM
  #279  
JJsEvo8's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 703
Likes: 0
From: USA
lol, awesome! You guys need to put racing slicks on and get some weight in the back of the car! That evo isnt getting any traction with the original spec wheels...

I'd like to see what she could do at the strip...
Reply
Old Jun 19, 2007 | 08:49 AM
  #280  
Dead-Man Inc's Avatar
Evolved Member
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 870
Likes: 0
From: Bahrain
LOL nice video
Reply
Old Jun 19, 2007 | 08:52 AM
  #281  
Kay@kacework.com's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 153
Likes: 0
From: Manchester, CT
I'll never be a fan of swaps like this... It just kills the car for me.
Reply
Old Jun 19, 2007 | 08:59 AM
  #282  
Dead-Man Inc's Avatar
Evolved Member
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 870
Likes: 0
From: Bahrain
The Video should be put on the original post
Reply
Old Jun 19, 2007 | 09:05 AM
  #283  
wingless's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (15)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 1,221
Likes: 6
From: Boston
It's always cool to stuff a big V8 into any car!!
Reply
Old Jun 19, 2007 | 09:07 AM
  #284  
0100's Avatar
Evolved Member
Veteran: Army
iTrader: (63)
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 507
Likes: 0
From: New England
Cool video. I want to see some high speed runs now! Great job guys.
Reply
Old Jun 19, 2007 | 09:18 AM
  #285  
ImJoey's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (20)
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 681
Likes: 0
From: South Florida
That video was stupid. Couple of burnouts dont impress me.Take that frankenstein to the track.
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 08:14 AM.