aerodynamic drag
But at the other end of the spectrum, there are some people who, in the quest for being as aerodynamic as possible (though obviously at a certain cost), have gotten thinner wheels (with fewer and smaller openings on the rim) and tires, shaved door handles, sealed panel gaps (not permanently), etc., all of which is a little overboard and not really too ideal for a daily-driven track car.
Trending Topics
Forget about it. The EVO is a Aerodynamic Brick. If you drag race you can seal off the ducts on the front end. That is what Buschner does.
Some of you guys are overestimating a bit by calling the Evo a "brick." Obviously 0.36 is nothing to be proud of, but it's decent for a reasonably roomy four-door sedan with a huge wing on its trunklid, as such parts that aid downforce sometimes add drag. Most other performance cars that have better Cd are usually tiny two-doors that don't have much room on the inside. Even the Ferrari F430 has a Cd of 0.33, despite all of its wind tunnel testing (though downforce was a pretty big priority as well). On the other hand, despite being a two-door fastback-like coupe, the Ford Mustang GT500 has a Cd of 0.38. Now that's brick-like, and it's a coupe.



