Notices
Evo General Discuss any generalized technical Evo related topics that may not fit into the other forums. Please do not post tech and rumor threads here.
Sponsored by: RavSpec - JDM Wheels Central
View Poll Results: Leave crash beams installed or remove them
REMOVE THEM
34
32.38%
KEEP THEM
71
67.62%
Voters: 105. You may not vote on this poll

Crash beams - remove or keep

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 14, 2008 | 03:31 PM
  #16  
Maikumaru's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 286
Likes: 0
From: Laguna Hills
get rid of it...or modify it to fit the JDM bumper
Reply
Old Mar 14, 2008 | 03:33 PM
  #17  
Robevo RS's Avatar
Evolved Member
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 10,535
Likes: 60
From: Park Ridge N.J.
nope, quote from

FEDERAL
MOTOR VEHICLE
SAFETY STANDARDS
AND REGULATIONS

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

NATIONAL HIGHWAY TRAFFIC
SAFETY ADMINISTRATION

SAFETY ASSURANCE

OFFICE OF VEHICLE SAFETY COMPLIANCE

400 7TH STREET, SW
ROOM 6111
MAIL CODE: NSA-30
WASHINGTON, DC 20590

"Part 581 - Bumper Standard - Passenger Motor Vehicles other than Multipurpose Passenger Vehicles (Effective 9-1-78 and 9-1-79) Test speeds reduced (Effective 7-4-82)
This standard establishes requirements for the impact resistance of vehicles in low speed front and rear collisions. The purpose of this standard is to reduce physical damage to the front and rear ends of a passenger motor vehicle from low speed collisions."
Reply
Old Mar 14, 2008 | 03:34 PM
  #18  
Mistaken's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (20)
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 2,757
Likes: 3
From: Seattle, Wa
Originally Posted by DSMorBUST
crash beams serve a purpose. just like seat-belts. whether you choose to use them, is up to you.
QFT
Reply
Old Mar 14, 2008 | 03:54 PM
  #19  
ForcedFedRS's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (23)
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 410
Likes: 0
From: Synergy Auto Lab
Removed my front crash beam, anything over 10mph it will do more harm than good. Those four bolts will shear at anything over that speed. Worked at a body shop for awhile and saw it all. This is strictly my opinion, nothing more.
Reply
Old Mar 14, 2008 | 04:29 PM
  #20  
Pure EvoIX's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 687
Likes: 1
From: Glendale, CA
just keep it on for insurance sake. Who cares for low speed crash <10mph.
In an event where you crash at a higher speed and insurance is involved you really want to have the beam on or you can say bye bye to that check. Unless its a pure track car, which makes it a moot point because insurance don't cover crashes while tracking so it doesn't really matter if its on or off. Your money. Your life. lol.

KEEP IT ON!! Not worth it guys. my 2c.
Reply
Old Mar 14, 2008 | 04:30 PM
  #21  
binarysleep's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 257
Likes: 0
From: Igloo
Originally Posted by Robevo RS
nope, quote from

FEDERAL
MOTOR VEHICLE
SAFETY STANDARDS
AND REGULATIONS

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

NATIONAL HIGHWAY TRAFFIC
SAFETY ADMINISTRATION

SAFETY ASSURANCE

OFFICE OF VEHICLE SAFETY COMPLIANCE

400 7TH STREET, SW
ROOM 6111
MAIL CODE: NSA-30
WASHINGTON, DC 20590

"Part 581 - Bumper Standard - Passenger Motor Vehicles other than Multipurpose Passenger Vehicles (Effective 9-1-78 and 9-1-79) Test speeds reduced (Effective 7-4-82)
This standard establishes requirements for the impact resistance of vehicles in low speed front and rear collisions. The purpose of this standard is to reduce physical damage to the front and rear ends of a passenger motor vehicle from low speed collisions."
There's a difference between a bumper and a crash beam. Bumpers are designed to withstand impacts of 5mph and less. Crash beams are for reducing cabin protrusion in higher speed accidents.

And you don't see them in other countries because the US has the highest safety standards! Yes, the Evo was designed for the Japanese market, and then adapted for the American market. The manufacturer is required to crash the car in several government mandated scenarios and make changes if necessary. Guess what? This meant adding crash beams for safety. If they did not work, then they would not have been added! It's simple really.
Reply
Old Mar 14, 2008 | 04:39 PM
  #22  
I-Dom-In-8's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (47)
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 1,210
Likes: 0
From: Chicago
KEEP IT ON
Reply
Old Mar 14, 2008 | 04:39 PM
  #23  
sabastian458's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (25)
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 1,607
Likes: 0
From: Upstate, SC
the front paper weight, is gone. That lil thing isnt going to help for crash protection except to put a hole in the intercooler.
Reply
Old Mar 14, 2008 | 04:43 PM
  #24  
Tarmacisback69's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 647
Likes: 0
From: Pasadena, Maryland
I do auto collision. Crash bars serve a huge purpose. They are designed to keep the frame rails intact and inline with each other when there is an impact. If you dont have these i can garentee there will be 100% more damage done to your car. As far as insurance is. They can turn down your repair if those parts were not on the vehicle Because it would create less damage obviously. I trust myself at the wheel 100% but accidents do happen. I have the rear crash on but not the front due to my fmic. If your worried about it. Im sure you could come up with some type of custom reinforcement bar. As far as having the front and rears removed i would only suggest this on track.
Reply
Old Mar 14, 2008 | 04:44 PM
  #25  
SILVERnSLOW's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 302
Likes: 0
From: Puyallup, wa
ditch them!
Reply
Old Mar 14, 2008 | 05:01 PM
  #26  
JDMCT9MR's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (56)
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 3,062
Likes: 2
From: Los Angeles
It would be better to have the crash beams than not to have them.
Reply
Old Mar 14, 2008 | 05:06 PM
  #27  
DSMorBUST's Avatar
Evolved Member
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 2,145
Likes: 0
From: North NJ ---> ATL
Originally Posted by Mistaken
QFT
what the hell does that mean?
Reply
Old Mar 14, 2008 | 05:15 PM
  #28  
psphinx81's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (38)
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 1,597
Likes: 2
From: Buffalo, NY
weight reduction
Reply
Old Mar 14, 2008 | 05:16 PM
  #29  
ch53avitech's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (37)
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 957
Likes: 0
From: San Diego, CA
Be smart, don't be a retard that regrets removing his crash beams after he finds out his insurance won't cover his car after a bad accident because he removed his crash beams. You say it won't happen to you but you'll want to kill yourself when it does and insurance can do nothing about it...drive smart.
Reply
Old Mar 14, 2008 | 05:39 PM
  #30  
Robevo RS's Avatar
Evolved Member
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 10,535
Likes: 60
From: Park Ridge N.J.
the crash beam is part of the bumper, as a energy absorbers or brackets.
"
Bumper beam on the Mercedes-Benz SL – the bumper’s crash optimised design effectively protects the vehicle against damage during low-speed front and rear end collisions, thus resulting in lower repair costs and less time in the repair shop"

http://www.ae-plus.com/key%20topics/kt-materials2.htm

"What is a bumper?


A bumper is a shield made of steel, aluminum, rubber, or plastic that is mounted on the front and rear of a passenger car. When a low speed collision occurs, the bumper system absorbs the shock to prevent or reduce damage to the car. Some bumpers use energy absorbers or brackets and others are made with a foam cushioning material."

if you wanna know more:

http://www.nhtsa.dot.gov/cars/proble...per/Index.html

but it is really your car. if you do a lots of DD i would leave it on, since low speed save money.


Last edited by Robevo RS; Mar 14, 2008 at 05:45 PM.
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 12:18 AM.