Notices
Evo Tires / Wheels / Brakes / Suspension Discuss everything that helps make your car start and stop to the best of it's abilities.

Who makes Titanium rims?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 26, 2004 | 07:57 PM
  #16  
Chris in HB's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 1,843
Likes: 0
From: No VA
Originally posted by inariv5573
You guys have all been helpful to me. I may actually steer away from magnesium. Considering the weight is not much different from aluminum given the price of magnesium. Also I don't drive on perfectly smooth roads. I am looking into the SSR GT3's at TireRack. They are expensive but not as expensive as Mags. Maybe even the Works Rims. I am just not sure if I should convert to 18's. Will they affect handling that much?
If you were willing to fork over the $$ for titanium wheels, then you should look at the Work Emotion (not the Kai) wheel. It is forged aluminum and pretty light for how strong they are. The Kai is a cast aluminum wheel of the same look, but much more inexpensive and actually very durable as well. I love Work wheels!!
Reply
Old Mar 26, 2004 | 08:39 PM
  #17  
zstryder's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (19)
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 1,779
Likes: 0
From: NorCal
If you get the mag wheels, they will probably get thrashed on the street - the track is the only place they really belong.
Reply
Old Mar 26, 2004 | 08:57 PM
  #18  
jbrennen's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 1,164
Likes: 0
From: San Diego
Originally posted by mrgracer
OK, i think that you guys are wrong saying that titanium is heavier than aluminum, privide some proof and I'll kiss your feet.
What kind of proof do you want?

A web search turns this up quite easily: http://www.mcelwee.net/html/densitie...materials.html

Aluminum weighs 2.643 grams per cc, Titanium weighs 4.5 grams per cc.

For comparison, Magnesium weighs 1.7 grams per cc, and Stainless Steel weighs 8.03 grams per cc.
Reply
Old Mar 27, 2004 | 05:54 AM
  #19  
Chris in HB's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 1,843
Likes: 0
From: No VA
I don't doubt your numbers, Jack, but I do wonder why my Cusco titanium front strut bar is so much lighter than the aluminum one...

Reply
Old Mar 27, 2004 | 06:23 AM
  #20  
jbrennen's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 1,164
Likes: 0
From: San Diego
Originally posted by Chris in HB
...I do wonder why my Cusco titanium front strut bar is so much lighter than the aluminum one...
I'm guessing that's because titanium is stronger than aluminum, so they can use thinner metal. You may be able to get the same part, same strength, to be lighter by using titanium compared to using aluminum.

But that's a different thing than saying that titanium is lighter than aluminum...
Reply
Old Mar 27, 2004 | 07:23 AM
  #21  
Chris in HB's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 1,843
Likes: 0
From: No VA
That makes sense.
Reply
Old Mar 27, 2004 | 11:30 AM
  #22  
Darwinator's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 393
Likes: 0
From: Bay Area
Uneccessary Comments Edited by mod

Last edited by timzcat; Mar 27, 2004 at 05:51 PM.
Reply
Old Mar 27, 2004 | 11:59 AM
  #23  
DRWN KIX's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 139
Likes: 0
From: Hesperia & Riverside
The fact is that different materials do have special characteristics that make them suitable for different applications. My primary expertise is in aluminum. Aluminum has very widely varying properties of corrosion resistance, strength and fatigue life. The best material for wheels would be forged 6069 T6. Good corrosion resistance and strength about 20% above 6061. It was developed for compressed gas cylinders and is used now for bicycle frames and air bag cylinders. Aluminum weights vary from .097 to .101 lbs per cubic inch. If aluminum is heated above about 400 F it loses about half of its ultimate tensile strength.
Titanium is very difficult to work with but has comparable weight to aluminum with potential strengths twice as high. It is the best material for springs and exhaust systems if cost is no object. Aluminum will not work for either of these items because of temperature and fatigue limit problems.
To compare materials considerations are: weight, strength, flexural modulus, fatigue life, fatigue limit, annealling temperature, hardness, sustained load cracking characteristics, corrosion resistence in several types. Deficiencies in many areas can be overcome with design. Metals are my life.

Last edited by DRWN KIX; Mar 27, 2004 at 12:04 PM.
Reply
Old Mar 28, 2004 | 07:51 AM
  #24  
mrgracer's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 15
Likes: 0
From: Knoxville
Originally posted by jbrennen


What kind of proof do you want?

A web search turns this up quite easily: http://www.mcelwee.net/html/densitie...materials.html

Aluminum weighs 2.643 grams per cc, Titanium weighs 4.5 grams per cc.

For comparison, Magnesium weighs 1.7 grams per cc, and Stainless Steel weighs 8.03 grams per cc.
Time to start kissing.... and thanks for the numbers, just never heard of that before. Thanks.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
romogst
Evo General
4
May 28, 2015 08:15 AM
ToMuchBoost
Evo Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain
39
May 17, 2006 08:12 AM
Monkey
Evo General
9
Aug 25, 2005 09:30 PM
JeffWels
Evo Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain
3
Jan 7, 2004 06:17 AM
HOK
Evo Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain
17
Feb 4, 2002 03:57 PM




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 12:07 PM.