Notices
Evo X Dyno Results Discuss vendor and member dyno tuning techniques, results and graphs.

MAPerformance Dyno Day for Fun:)

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 5, 2009 | 06:58 AM
  #1  
murlo26's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 4,119
Likes: 1
From: Minnesota
MAPerformance Dyno Day for Fun:)

So this is something almost all of you know, but here is the differences between a Dynojet and 1.0CF dyno dynamics. Enjoy! (Dyno dynamics numbers are in sig, 353-354whp/376wtq)

Oh, also, the dyno day was pretty sweet, some nice cars out there

Reply
Old Oct 5, 2009 | 08:00 AM
  #2  
scheides's Avatar
EvoM Moderator
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 4,827
Likes: 13
From: Minneapolis
I rode in this car and it feels fantastic! This is a great power level for evoX's to get to to really get that 'modded evo' feeling that the 8's and 9's provide at a bit less power...aside from riding in Ryan Gates' car (which is more like riding in a race car) I hadn't yet felt this way about an X. Just smooth snappy powerband, snick through gears, I was in love!
Reply
Old Oct 5, 2009 | 08:33 AM
  #3  
ChrisCarey's Avatar
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (38)
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,956
Likes: 3
From: Plymouth, MN
So an 8-10% difference depending on how you do your calculations huh? Very interesting especially with people claiming up to 18% or more differences!
Reply
Old Oct 5, 2009 | 08:36 AM
  #4  
murlo26's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 4,119
Likes: 1
From: Minnesota
Originally Posted by ChrisCarey
So an 8-10% difference depending on how you do your calculations huh? Very interesting especially with people claiming up to 18% or more differences!
I have talked with other people that said going from DBs DD dyno to yours have seen 15% but i figured that was a little high.

I figured i would be right around 400whp on your guy's dyno and was pretty much right. A big difference sure, but it doesn't really matter, people just need to focus on gains as has been said many times.
Reply
Old Oct 5, 2009 | 08:42 AM
  #5  
ChrisCarey's Avatar
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (38)
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,956
Likes: 3
From: Plymouth, MN
Originally Posted by murlo26
I have talked with other people that said going from DBs DD dyno to yours have seen 15% but i figured that was a little high.

I figured i would be right around 400whp on your guy's dyno and was pretty much right. A big difference sure, but it doesn't really matter, people just need to focus on gains as has been said many times.
I agree 100% and that's why I'm a Dynojet fan as there is no human factor in the outcome which makes comparisons to other dynos a lot more reliable...
Reply
Old Oct 5, 2009 | 09:00 AM
  #6  
scheides's Avatar
EvoM Moderator
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 4,827
Likes: 13
From: Minneapolis
Remember the weather was different too, and MAP was using SAE correction. Is it possible to go back and look at the uncorrected numbers?

I saw about 12% on my evo8:
https://www.evolutionm.net/forums/ev...ml#post7576881

But, June30 vs Oct3rd, it was 50° colder, etc etc. It can be argued to no end I'm sure.
Reply
Old Oct 7, 2009 | 05:57 AM
  #7  
rcodea's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
From: Columbia, SC
nice!

~Ryan
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
murlo26
Evo X Dyno Results
69
Nov 28, 2011 10:01 AM
murlo26
Evo X General
402
Jun 8, 2011 10:59 AM
murlo26
Evo X Dyno Results
63
Oct 19, 2010 03:05 PM
murlo26
Evo X Dyno Results
23
Feb 27, 2010 11:38 AM
murlo26
Evo X Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain
11
Aug 20, 2009 06:28 AM




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 11:58 AM.