My Green dyno
Those figures are the relative gains at that particular rpm noted, not at peak. I'm still amazed of how hard it pulls at the top end 
Last edited by LVSBB6; Nov 12, 2009 at 10:02 AM.
Former Sponsor
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 147
Likes: 0
From: Canada
Ben, I don't think MD dyno graphs says SAE on the plot, pretty sure they are corrected values though.
You may be right on the conversion on the whp, but i think the wtq on the MD may read even lower. I previously dyno'ed with my stock turbo setup with all my mods tuned at 26.5psi tapering to 21psi at Dynapak and put down 294whp and 310wtq.
Did you put down 355wtq as you sig stated? I thought it says 335wtq on your dyno
Either way I am surprised on the torque you were putting down with your car.
What kind of boost/timing were you running to get those numbers? Were you running high octane gas?
You may be right on the conversion on the whp, but i think the wtq on the MD may read even lower. I previously dyno'ed with my stock turbo setup with all my mods tuned at 26.5psi tapering to 21psi at Dynapak and put down 294whp and 310wtq.
Did you put down 355wtq as you sig stated? I thought it says 335wtq on your dyno
Either way I am surprised on the torque you were putting down with your car. What kind of boost/timing were you running to get those numbers? Were you running high octane gas?
I know they like to give customers uncorrected number to make them happier and I used to be one of their customer
My concern is results from before and after. I seriously think your car can make more power than that since you got a huge investment to the power mods.
My car is making 335.2TQ with 25psi tapering down to 18 psi and I am only running 94CHEVRON
, I did not touch the cam timing based on the cobb stage 2 map. Actually, I will do more street tuning and I will re-dyno again, my power curve is not very smooth and some rpm ranges are still a bit too rich.
I called to verify that my numbers are corrected values.
My tune is very conservative at the moment, my AF is hovering around 10.9 to 11.0 at the top end, and we eliminate any knock counts throughout the entire power band. It`s not a bad idea to run a bit safer to make sure everything is running well before pushing it a bit further. I`m sure there is still room for improvement for my tune.
I`m really impressed with your figures on the dynapack, your exhaust probably helps the top end quite a bit. My Blitz exhaust could be a bit restrictive in comparison since it is a standard muffler design.
My tune is very conservative at the moment, my AF is hovering around 10.9 to 11.0 at the top end, and we eliminate any knock counts throughout the entire power band. It`s not a bad idea to run a bit safer to make sure everything is running well before pushing it a bit further. I`m sure there is still room for improvement for my tune.
I`m really impressed with your figures on the dynapack, your exhaust probably helps the top end quite a bit. My Blitz exhaust could be a bit restrictive in comparison since it is a standard muffler design.
Leo,
I know they like to give customers uncorrected number to make them happier and I used to be one of their customer
My concern is results from before and after. I seriously think your car can make more power than that since you got a huge investment to the power mods.
My car is making 335.2TQ with 25psi tapering down to 18 psi and I am only running 94CHEVRON, I did not touch the cam timing based on the cobb stage 2 map. Actually, I will do more street tuning and I will re-dyno again, my power curve is not very smooth and some rpm ranges are still a bit too rich.
I know they like to give customers uncorrected number to make them happier and I used to be one of their customer
My concern is results from before and after. I seriously think your car can make more power than that since you got a huge investment to the power mods.
My car is making 335.2TQ with 25psi tapering down to 18 psi and I am only running 94CHEVRON
, I did not touch the cam timing based on the cobb stage 2 map. Actually, I will do more street tuning and I will re-dyno again, my power curve is not very smooth and some rpm ranges are still a bit too rich.Last edited by LVSBB6; Nov 12, 2009 at 11:46 AM.
When you said a Bone stock MR Registered with 185 - 190 WHP? you were saying a bone stock MR EVO X...wow is it suppose to be that low?
Last edited by AJR-Coco; Nov 12, 2009 at 02:28 PM.
As I said in the first post, I made 200whp with an intake, FMIC and 19" wheels at RG`s mustang dyno. Would probably be higher on a different dyno though.
For sure! Cams would probably improve the spool and overall gains, but i may end up with a lumpy idle
I see you drive a IX, how much power are putting down so far?
I see you drive a IX, how much power are putting down so far?
Former Sponsor
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 147
Likes: 0
From: Canada
Evolving Member
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 291
Likes: 2
From: Belgium
LVSBB6: Nice power. I see you are holding abt 25psi at abt 7000rpm. If you don't mind me asking, how much timing are you running at 7000rpm?
Tks
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
