EvolutionM - Mitsubishi Lancer and Lancer Evolution Community

Notices
Evo X Dyno Results Discuss vendor and member dyno tuning techniques, results and graphs.

Dom2 + E85 + BlaqOps = 452whp

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 17, 2009, 03:05 PM
  #16  
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (6)
 
DG Motors's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: long island
Posts: 1,840
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by GST Motorsports
No problem. I'm all for sharing info, but I just think different vendor/dyno plots in another vendor/dyno plots thread like that can be a recipe for confusion.

- Bryan
Understood.
DG Motors is offline  
Reply Like
Old Nov 17, 2009, 03:18 PM
  #17  
Account Disabled
iTrader: (10)
 
Evo a Mula's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: bayshore ny
Posts: 1,819
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
How is that double pumper working are you anywear near maxing it out?
Evo a Mula is offline  
Reply Like
Old Nov 17, 2009, 03:23 PM
  #18  
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (6)
 
DG Motors's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: long island
Posts: 1,840
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Evo a Mula
How is that double pumper working are you anywear near maxing it out?
12.4 to 9.6 @ 50 base seems like It is doing It's job rather well!
DG Motors is offline  
Reply Like
Old Nov 18, 2009, 07:50 AM
  #19  
Newbie
 
t12ung's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: San Jose
Posts: 38
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Yeah I am no where close to maxing on BLAQOPS's double pumper system. I think Bryan concluded that I have enough fuel delivery to run a gt35r no problem. I love it because its so quiet and you don't get a whine like the external inline pumps.
t12ung is offline  
Reply Like
Old Nov 18, 2009, 07:51 AM
  #20  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (9)
 
murlo26's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 4,119
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
You have the one based on the MAF signal right?
murlo26 is offline  
Reply Like
Old Nov 18, 2009, 07:54 AM
  #21  
Newbie
 
t12ung's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: San Jose
Posts: 38
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
No I used boost controlled.
t12ung is offline  
Reply Like
Old Nov 18, 2009, 08:00 AM
  #22  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (9)
 
murlo26's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 4,119
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by t12ung
No I used boost controlled.
So there is a progressive boost controlled one and progressive MAF signal one?

So this isn't just the hobb's switch one is it? Where at X amount of boost the second guy kicks on.
murlo26 is offline  
Reply Like
Old Nov 18, 2009, 08:04 AM
  #23  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (9)
 
murlo26's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 4,119
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Nevermind, I didn't realize that the progressive controllers use either boost of MAF signal. Answered my own question, i checked their website again.
murlo26 is offline  
Reply Like
Old Nov 18, 2009, 08:21 AM
  #24  
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (6)
 
DG Motors's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: long island
Posts: 1,840
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by t12ung
Yeah I am no where close to maxing on BLAQOPS's double pumper system. I think Bryan concluded that I have enough fuel delivery to run a gt35r no problem. I love it because its so quiet and you don't get a whine like the external inline pumps.
That's great, the 044 pumps we have been using are quite noisy which is impossible to hide unless you have a real loud exhaust.

Can't really be too stealthy with an external pump that whines like a dying goose.
DG Motors is offline  
Reply Like
Old Nov 18, 2009, 08:35 AM
  #25  
Account Disabled
iTrader: (10)
 
Evo a Mula's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: bayshore ny
Posts: 1,819
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by DG Motors
That's great, the 044 pumps we have been using are quite noisy which is impossible to hide unless you have a real loud exhaust.

Can't really be too stealthy with an external pump that whines like a dying goose.
yeah thoes external pumps are loud...w/e thoe ill just turn the radio up lol
Evo a Mula is offline  
Reply Like
Old Nov 18, 2009, 09:33 AM
  #26  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (9)
 
Hiboost's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Rochester, NY
Posts: 3,222
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts
Nice results and powerband here! Hopefully I can get something similar on race gas and my GT30.
Hiboost is offline  
Reply Like
Old Nov 18, 2009, 09:35 AM
  #27  
Account Disabled
Thread Starter
iTrader: (8)
 
GST Motorsports's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Hayward
Posts: 3,366
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by murlo26
So there is a progressive boost controlled one and progressive MAF signal one?

So this isn't just the hobb's switch one is it? Where at X amount of boost the second guy kicks on.
Yes boost or MAF signal, this Evo has the Boost reference. It will progressively come on with boost. You select a initial starting boost and a full tilt boost level. The pump will smoothly come into full flow at the starting PSI and into the full flow PSI.

Think of it as a meth controller for your fuel system.

- Bryan
GST Motorsports is offline  
Reply Like
Old Nov 18, 2009, 09:37 AM
  #28  
Account Disabled
Thread Starter
iTrader: (8)
 
GST Motorsports's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Hayward
Posts: 3,366
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Hiboost
Nice results and powerband here! Hopefully I can get something similar on race gas and my GT30.
The one Evo 10 GT30 (after the first one blew up and took out the downpipe) on our dyno made 393whp on 116 oct at 28psi. 350whp on 91 oct at 24psi.

- Bryan
GST Motorsports is offline  
Reply Like
Old Nov 18, 2009, 09:48 AM
  #29  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (9)
 
Hiboost's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Rochester, NY
Posts: 3,222
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts
Originally Posted by GST Motorsports
The one Evo 10 GT30 (after the first one blew up and took out the downpipe) on our dyno made 393whp on 116 oct at 28psi. 350whp on 91 oct at 24psi.

- Bryan
Hmm that's interesting as a comparison, I'm pretty sure I can beat that but we will see. Based on VDR dyno comparisons I'm already up 20-30 whp from when I was dynoed last at 385 whp on STM's Mustang Dyno @ 27 psi (dyno reads similar to yours). I'm hoping to see solid gains from my modified intake manifold and Cosworth MX1 cams running about 30-32 psi on race gas. Likely the boost will make the biggest difference in the low to mid range where as generous timing advance will have to make up for the boost falloff above ~7400 to raise the peak HP numbers.

Either way that Dom2/E85 combo is about as good as you can get on a stock framed turbo setup and something to shoot for!
Hiboost is offline  
Reply Like
Old Nov 18, 2009, 10:13 AM
  #30  
Account Disabled
Thread Starter
iTrader: (8)
 
GST Motorsports's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Hayward
Posts: 3,366
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Hiboost
Hmm that's interesting as a comparison, I'm pretty sure I can beat that but we will see. Based on VDR dyno comparisons I'm already up 20-30 whp from when I was dynoed last at 385 whp on STM's Mustang Dyno @ 27 psi (dyno reads similar to yours). I'm hoping to see solid gains from my modified intake manifold and Cosworth MX1 cams running about 30-32 psi on race gas. Likely the boost will make the biggest difference in the low to mid range where as generous timing advance will have to make up for the boost falloff above ~7400 to raise the peak HP numbers.

Either way that Dom2/E85 combo is about as good as you can get on a stock framed turbo setup and something to shoot for!
I hope you have better luck with the turbo. It just wasn't showing much gains past 28psi for me but you will have cams.

- Bryan
GST Motorsports is offline  
Reply Like



Advanced Search
Quick Reply: Dom2 + E85 + BlaqOps = 452whp


Reply Closed Thread Share

All times are GMT -7. The time now is 09:33 AM.