Notices
Evo X Dyno Results Discuss vendor and member dyno tuning techniques, results and graphs.

Evo 10 MR + Blouch Dom 2.0 on 91 oct

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 30, 2009 | 11:34 AM
  #1  
GST Motorsports's Avatar
Thread Starter
Account Disabled
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 3,366
Likes: 2
From: Hayward
Evo 10 MR + Blouch Dom 2.0 on 91 oct

2008 Evo MR SST

Mods:

Ultimate Racing Downpipe
Ultimate Racing High Flow Cat
Buschur Catback
BlaqOps Progressive Double Pumper kit(MAF controlled)
DW 1000cc injectors
AEM Intake
ETS FMIC
Upper IC pipes
Blouch Dominator 2.0 stock appearing turbo
GST 3 port boost solenoid
GST Custom dyno tune
91 oct
24.5psi

First Evo 10 MR through the shop with a upgraded turbo. This car needed some tweaking of the (currently in beta) SST transmission tables in EcuFlash, because of the added power, the clutches would open up at WOT but now with the SST table tweaks all is good in the world. Overall, pretty good power on a MR, espically with a cat. It's setup for E85 so that is down the road.

A bolt on, tuned stock turbo Evo 10 MR produces approx 290whp on our dyno for comparison. Which is about 15-20whp less than a comparable GSR.


333 whp / 281 wtq


Dotted lines are a 100% stock Evo 10 MR for comparison.

Reply
Old Nov 30, 2009 | 12:08 PM
  #2  
scheides's Avatar
EvoM Moderator
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 4,827
Likes: 13
From: Minneapolis
You poor cali guys and 91 octane That turbo should be 350+ on some decent pump gas and no cat.

Awesome to see an MR setup to make some power. Nice setup, and awesome on the SST Ecuflash teweaks
Reply
Old Nov 30, 2009 | 12:36 PM
  #3  
murlo26's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 4,119
Likes: 1
From: Minnesota
Nice results, so do you prefer the progressive boost or progressive MAF signal double pumper?

Any advantages to either? Seeing as you are one of the few to use both just wondering if its a personal preference or one is easier or what.
Reply
Old Nov 30, 2009 | 12:44 PM
  #4  
lousEVOxmr's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 388
Likes: 0
From: Canada,montreal
nice power ,
low wtq tho ... ?
is it for the safty of the tranny .?
Reply
Old Nov 30, 2009 | 01:02 PM
  #5  
HR2L's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 475
Likes: 0
From: San Jose, CA
Originally Posted by GST Motorsports
2008 Evo MR SST

Mods:

Ultimate Racing Downpipe
Ultimate Racing High Flow Cat
Buschur Catback
BlaqOps Progressive Double Pumper kit(MAF controlled)
DW 1000cc injectors
AEM Intake
ETS FMIC
Upper IC pipes
Blouch Dominator 2.0 stock appearing turbo
GST 3 port boost solenoid
GST Custom dyno tune
91 oct
24.5psi

First Evo 10 MR through the shop with a upgraded turbo. This car needed some tweaking of the (currently in beta) SST transmission tables in EcuFlash, because of the added power, the clutches would open up at WOT but now with the SST table tweaks all is good in the world. Overall, pretty good power on a MR, espically with a cat. It's setup for E85 so that is down the road.

A bolt on, tuned stock turbo Evo 10 MR produces approx 290whp on our dyno for comparison. Which is about 15-20whp less than a comparable GSR.


333 whp / 281 wtq


Dotted lines are a 100% stock Evo 10 MR for comparison.

Thats basicly what I put down (in TQ) without a turbo upgrade. Nice numbers Bryan! Was thinking about a Blouch Dom 2.0, now I know what I can expect. I pretty much so have identical setup (- the turbo and double pump).
Reply
Old Nov 30, 2009 | 01:34 PM
  #6  
LVSBB6's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 1,366
Likes: 0
From: CAN
Very impressive gains for a low-boost MR running a HFC!
Reply
Old Nov 30, 2009 | 01:35 PM
  #7  
GST Motorsports's Avatar
Thread Starter
Account Disabled
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 3,366
Likes: 2
From: Hayward
The torque is about normal for the Evo 10, on our dyno, with a stock appearing turbo upgrade on 91 oct.

Take a look at these for more data:

Dom 2 on a GSR with stock turbo overlay ( to compare torque levels to stock turbo):

https://www.evolutionm.net/forums/ev...ps-452whp.html

FPred on a GSR at 24psi, almost identical curves:

https://www.evolutionm.net/forums/ev...-10-fpred.html

- Bryan
Reply
Old Nov 30, 2009 | 02:52 PM
  #8  
Evo a Mula's Avatar
Account Disabled
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 1,819
Likes: 0
From: bayshore ny
nice gains
Reply
Old Nov 30, 2009 | 03:24 PM
  #9  
HR2L's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 475
Likes: 0
From: San Jose, CA
Originally Posted by GST Motorsports
The torque is about normal for the Evo 10, on our dyno, with a stock appearing turbo upgrade on 91 oct.

Take a look at these for more data:

Dom 2 on a GSR with stock turbo overlay ( to compare torque levels to stock turbo):

https://www.evolutionm.net/forums/ev...ps-452whp.html

FPred on a GSR at 24psi, almost identical curves:

https://www.evolutionm.net/forums/ev...-10-fpred.html

- Bryan
Bryan, I already have some different fun for you to tune here ASAP.

I going to order a set of Kelford Cams, and Springs.

Should be semi-interesting!
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
GST Motorsports
Evo X Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain
32
Dec 24, 2017 10:16 PM
GST Motorsports
Evo Dyno Tuning / Results
57
Dec 3, 2014 05:27 PM
Boostd4
Evo X Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain
142
Jul 20, 2013 04:41 PM
DRAG
Drag Racing
314
Jun 4, 2013 10:39 AM
GST Motorsports
Mitsubishi TC-SST Discussion
20
Dec 22, 2011 01:54 AM




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 08:52 AM.