409 HP @ CBRD with BBX
this is the compressor wheel in our time attack turbo,
which makes 550whp
on 93
the turbo is good for 30-32 psi, much more than that, id have to throw a larger compressor wheel on it, which we COULD do LOL!
cb
which makes 550whp
on 93 the turbo is good for 30-32 psi, much more than that, id have to throw a larger compressor wheel on it, which we COULD do LOL!
cb
Sigh, i can only imagine my bov is leaking running 33psi, lol. I bet my turbo is really working hard to keep up.
If i picked up 38whp from a switch i would call it quits on mods, i would be right where i wanted to be, lol. Then just try to keep it together.
That is awesome Chad that you picked up that much. Did you have a crush on the stock one at all?
If i picked up 38whp from a switch i would call it quits on mods, i would be right where i wanted to be, lol. Then just try to keep it together.
That is awesome Chad that you picked up that much. Did you have a crush on the stock one at all?
great numbers chad.
Just wondering tho, there is only about a 16whp difference and tq was about the same from what gst made on this turbo with e85? From what i have read, you both use mustang dyno's that read around the same.
Does that mean this turbo does just as well on pump gas as with e85?
I also looked over the 91 oct reading's that they(GST) put up and it is an impressive gain compared to that.
If you could share a little bit more info on this, i would love to know because this is my number one turbo choice but from what i have been reading, it's not holding up to the fp red's number or green(I know they probably shouldn't be compared). But if that is the numbers from 93 oct, that is pretty impressive then.
Just wondering tho, there is only about a 16whp difference and tq was about the same from what gst made on this turbo with e85? From what i have read, you both use mustang dyno's that read around the same.
Does that mean this turbo does just as well on pump gas as with e85?
I also looked over the 91 oct reading's that they(GST) put up and it is an impressive gain compared to that.
If you could share a little bit more info on this, i would love to know because this is my number one turbo choice but from what i have been reading, it's not holding up to the fp red's number or green(I know they probably shouldn't be compared). But if that is the numbers from 93 oct, that is pretty impressive then.
i see that he does have the cbrd manifold which was not stated on the thread on evoxforums.
is that where the extra power is coming from?
If so, please put me down for the bbx and manifold
is that where the extra power is coming from?
If so, please put me down for the bbx and manifold
https://www.evolutionm.net/forums/ev...-whp-peak.html
You're just being sneaky with your sig, then?
It has always seemed that CBRD's dyno reads higher than GST's. The highest number I've seen for a Dom2 or Red on GST's dyno is in the 430's. The car that you linked to doesn't have a mani and it had a cat...that alone could account for the difference. One of them might have heavy or light wheels as well, for all we know. There are too many variables unless it is a same-car/dyno test and that isn't done very often.
It has always seemed that CBRD's dyno reads higher than GST's. The highest number I've seen for a Dom2 or Red on GST's dyno is in the 430's. The car that you linked to doesn't have a mani and it had a cat...that alone could account for the difference. One of them might have heavy or light wheels as well, for all we know. There are too many variables unless it is a same-car/dyno test and that isn't done very often.
You're just being sneaky with your sig, then?
It has always seemed that CBRD's dyno reads higher than GST's. The highest number I've seen for a Dom2 or Red on GST's dyno is in the 430's. The car that you linked to doesn't have a mani and it had a cat...that alone could account for the difference. One of them might have heavy or light wheels as well, for all we know. There are too many variables unless it is a same-car/dyno test and that isn't done very often.
It has always seemed that CBRD's dyno reads higher than GST's. The highest number I've seen for a Dom2 or Red on GST's dyno is in the 430's. The car that you linked to doesn't have a mani and it had a cat...that alone could account for the difference. One of them might have heavy or light wheels as well, for all we know. There are too many variables unless it is a same-car/dyno test and that isn't done very often.
You're just being sneaky with your sig, then?
It has always seemed that CBRD's dyno reads higher than GST's. The highest number I've seen for a Dom2 or Red on GST's dyno is in the 430's. The car that you linked to doesn't have a mani and it had a cat...that alone could account for the difference. One of them might have heavy or light wheels as well, for all we know. There are too many variables unless it is a same-car/dyno test and that isn't done very often.
It has always seemed that CBRD's dyno reads higher than GST's. The highest number I've seen for a Dom2 or Red on GST's dyno is in the 430's. The car that you linked to doesn't have a mani and it had a cat...that alone could account for the difference. One of them might have heavy or light wheels as well, for all we know. There are too many variables unless it is a same-car/dyno test and that isn't done very often.
thanks for the info. I forgot to take the cat into consideration also.