VDR: stock turbo vs CBRD BBX
The thing is, once you're above 4500 (i.e. any time you're having 'fun') it is hardly slower to spool than the stock turbo, step on gas, kthxbyebye.
FWIW, my BBK on my evo8 made 25psi@3800rpm, so this setup is far from laggy compared to that, it is actually pretty similar. The BBK had a little more life at 3000rpm but not nearly as much above 6500 (unless I was on alky!)
My plan for this car is (on pump gas) to have the powerband of my BBK on pump gas (peaked @~380whp on dyno dynamics) but with the peak power of it on alky (420whp dyno dynamics) since power started to fall off around 6500rpm and on the BBX/X it just keeps going up up up!
Last edited by scheides; Aug 11, 2010 at 11:08 AM.
I wasn't trying to make this into a pissing contest of any sort, I apologize.
The point I was trying to make here is that the BBX is capable of much more, some people may be considering the purchase of a BBX but after coming in to a results thread similar to this one they might base their decision off of a poor example.
Again I apologize for the way I might have come off.
The point I was trying to make here is that the BBX is capable of much more, some people may be considering the purchase of a BBX but after coming in to a results thread similar to this one they might base their decision off of a poor example.
Again I apologize for the way I might have come off.
It's cool man, yes I hope to get a lot more out of it in the near future.
I have had this plot for a week now and thought a few times about posting it but always decided against it for that very reason. This is just a good example of a sub-par setup
With some love, it should come up to par
I have had this plot for a week now and thought a few times about posting it but always decided against it for that very reason. This is just a good example of a sub-par setup
With some love, it should come up to par
The BBX is a great turbo.
So far we have had the BBX to 391 whp on our dyno, on pump 91 oct, on a 2008 Evo MR.
Almost breaking 400whp on pump 91 oct on a stock housing turbo is a bit of a holy grail here.
The only other stock appearing turbo to break 400 whp (403whp) on our dyno on pump 91 oct was, surprise, a BBK Full on a very well setup evo 9 at 24.5psi
- Bryan
So far we have had the BBX to 391 whp on our dyno, on pump 91 oct, on a 2008 Evo MR.
Almost breaking 400whp on pump 91 oct on a stock housing turbo is a bit of a holy grail here.
The only other stock appearing turbo to break 400 whp (403whp) on our dyno on pump 91 oct was, surprise, a BBK Full on a very well setup evo 9 at 24.5psi
- Bryan
The BBX is a great turbo.
So far we have had the BBX to 391 whp on our dyno, on pump 91 oct, on a 2008 Evo MR.
Almost breaking 400whp on pump 91 oct on a stock housing turbo is a bit of a holy grail here.
The only other stock appearing turbo to break 400 whp (403whp) on our dyno on pump 91 oct was, surprise, a BBK Full on a very well setup evo 9 at 24.5psi
- Bryan
So far we have had the BBX to 391 whp on our dyno, on pump 91 oct, on a 2008 Evo MR.
Almost breaking 400whp on pump 91 oct on a stock housing turbo is a bit of a holy grail here.
The only other stock appearing turbo to break 400 whp (403whp) on our dyno on pump 91 oct was, surprise, a BBK Full on a very well setup evo 9 at 24.5psi
- Bryan
What turbo do you suggest for the most bang for the buck in a DD street driven vehicle with good spool?
I think the comparison is still a very valid one and shows exactly how the turbo will react when bolted on with pump gas.
Obviously it can be pushed much further, but a full dyno session and better fuel would be needed along with some more bolt on's and cams/springs.
Obviously it can be pushed much further, but a full dyno session and better fuel would be needed along with some more bolt on's and cams/springs.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
scheides
Evo X Dyno Results
10
Aug 27, 2010 07:46 AM
scheides
Vendor Service / Parts / Tuning Review
4
Aug 23, 2010 08:59 AM
GST Motorsports
Evo X Dyno Results
30
May 11, 2010 09:29 AM





