Notices
Evo X Dyno Results Discuss vendor and member dyno tuning techniques, results and graphs.

FP RED + 92 OCT = 490 whp

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 6, 2010 | 10:42 AM
  #16  
GST Motorsports's Avatar
Account Disabled
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 3,366
Likes: 2
From: Hayward
Originally Posted by murlo26
With zero signs of detonation You are telling me you never alter the knock tables? I believe you posted the stock ones before showing how sensitive they get up top.
Yes I posted the factory knock table settings before when mrfred said he kept seeing knock over 7k, saying "look at this and you will see why". I do not and will not give actual knock table setting advice.

I just think getting knock table advice from somebody that vented a block shortly after tweaking said knock tables is a bit "YMMV" to say the least.

- Bryan
Reply
Old Oct 6, 2010 | 10:47 AM
  #17  
murlo26's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 4,119
Likes: 1
From: Minnesota
Originally Posted by GST Motorsports
Yes I posted the factory knock table settings before when mrfred said he kept seeing knock over 7k, saying "look at this and you will see why". I do and will not give knock table setting advice.

I just think getting knock table advice from somebody that vented a block shortly after tweaking said knock tables is a bit "YMMV" to say the least.

- Bryan
I am not saying he should adjust them, especially on crappy 92 octane. I upped my torque significantly at the same time as adjusting the tables, trying to blame my tuner for the knock table adjustments is dumb, we examined the block and there weren't signs that it was detonating.

I was simply saying that I am sure many people are getting phantom knock or their tables are set too sensitive to make more power. I don't tune my car or pretend to know how to tune...I rarely ever give tuning advice, if it could be called advice even, more so alert people to certain conditions that could exist.

I just think its a little low to say that just because my motor blew up it was my tuners fault and HAS to be because the knock tables were adjusted and not the 33psi on the stock block and big torque spike.
Reply
Old Oct 6, 2010 | 10:58 AM
  #18  
GST Motorsports's Avatar
Account Disabled
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 3,366
Likes: 2
From: Hayward
Originally Posted by murlo26
I am not saying he should adjust them, especially on crappy 92 octane. I upped my torque significantly at the same time as adjusting the tables, trying to blame my tuner for the knock table adjustments is dumb, we examined the block and there weren't signs that it was detonating.

I was simply saying that I am sure many people are getting phantom knock or their tables are set too sensitive to make more power. I don't tune my car or pretend to know how to tune...I rarely ever give tuning advice, if it could be called advice even, more so alert people to certain conditions that could exist.

I just think its a little low to say that just because my motor blew up it was my tuners fault and HAS to be because the knock tables were adjusted and not the 33psi on the stock block and big torque spike.
wait wut? How and when did I blame your tuner??? I also didn't say it HAS to be because of the tables... stop putting words in my posts, or posts in my words? lol

This thread needs more beer.

Nice results Mrfred, that car must pull like a freight train.

- Bryan

Last edited by GST Motorsports; Oct 6, 2010 at 11:07 AM.
Reply
Old Oct 6, 2010 | 11:16 AM
  #19  
mlomker's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 1,468
Likes: 0
From: Saint Paul
Originally Posted by GST Motorsports
How and when did I blame your tuner?
You made two separate posts in this thread commenting on his vented block. He doesn't self-tune so I'm not sure how else he should have interpreted it.

He got greedy with the Red/E85 tune and in retrospect it's not too surprising. Most of the tunes that you've posted are only 28psi on that type of turbo (DOM, BBX).
Reply
Old Oct 6, 2010 | 11:19 AM
  #20  
tsitalon1's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 2,072
Likes: 3
From: Southeast USA
On my green I also see some random knock around 7200-7600, usually 2-6 counts. I don't own dent cans and therefore can't verify if it's true knock or not. I would not be fully comfortable adjusting these really. I'm also not sure it's worth it for another 20whp....

I would like to resolve the knock in a safe manner. What would the danger be in adjusting these 10% lower, would that be enough to possibly cause damage?
Reply
Old Oct 6, 2010 | 12:03 PM
  #21  
EVOOOOO's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 100
Likes: 0
From: New York
does everything being ported really make that much a difference? Im makin 450 397 on 28psi. Your making 492 on 92 @ 26.5 PSI. I see you have rod bolts & what not but how come such a difference in my power compared to yours? congrats on the numbers!
Reply
Old Oct 6, 2010 | 12:10 PM
  #22  
mlomker's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 1,468
Likes: 0
From: Saint Paul
Originally Posted by EVOOOOO
how come such a difference in my power compared to yours?
Are your numbers also from VDR? No two dynos are the same and VDR isn't even a dyno.
Reply
Old Oct 6, 2010 | 12:12 PM
  #23  
murlo26's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 4,119
Likes: 1
From: Minnesota
Originally Posted by mlomker
Are your numbers also from VDR? No two dynos are the same and VDR isn't even a dyno.
This...VDR is extremely hit or miss, don't take those numbers and compare them to anything...not worth it. You are probably pretty close if not above that on VDR, personally i don't like VDR for the numbers game as its even worse than the "my dyno reads low" game, but it works as a tool or measuring a mod the same day type of thing. It's all just numbers anyway.
Reply
Old Oct 6, 2010 | 12:14 PM
  #24  
3dman1's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 177
Likes: 0
From: kennewick wa
when im done i will put it on a dyno i have no doubts about the numbers they will be very close to english racings dyno and cobb tunning surgline. I have been on both and the vdr has always been nearly identical. But will admit they are fairly high reading dynos but i will take any bets that my dyno # will be within 10 whp on either dyno.

Last edited by 3dman1; Oct 6, 2010 at 12:24 PM.
Reply
Old Oct 6, 2010 | 12:16 PM
  #25  
2LOFD3ATH's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 427
Likes: 0
From: I live here!
Originally Posted by Eric Morse
Do you think with 93 with a stock head it could make 450whp?

Well?
Reply
Old Oct 6, 2010 | 12:20 PM
  #26  
EVOOOOO's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 100
Likes: 0
From: New York
Originally Posted by mlomker
Are your numbers also from VDR? No two dynos are the same and VDR isn't even a dyno.
No I just realized it said VDR ill have to check it out one day see what my car comes up with on that.
Reply
Old Oct 6, 2010 | 12:21 PM
  #27  
EVOOOOO's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 100
Likes: 0
From: New York
Originally Posted by 3dman1
Evoooo my best guess is im holding more boost up top i have the 18 psi actuator and shortened up the rod to get a few more psi at the top but its just a guess. From the numbers i have seen i think the porting is worth about 40 whp. Im loving me some gscs2 cams.
What does your boost taper too? mine goes from 28-25 sometimes it holds 26 weather depending.
Reply
Old Oct 6, 2010 | 12:24 PM
  #28  
mrfred's Avatar
Thread Starter
EvoM Guru
iTrader: (50)
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 9,675
Likes: 132
From: Tri-Cities, WA // Portland, OR
Originally Posted by murlo26
I am not saying he should adjust them, especially on crappy 92 octane. I upped my torque significantly at the same time as adjusting the tables, trying to blame my tuner for the knock table adjustments is dumb, we examined the block and there weren't signs that it was detonating.

...
Interesting part about the knock tables is that there is both a background noise adder and a multiplier. At 7000+ rpm, the multiplier is reduced, but the adder is increased.

Originally Posted by GST Motorsports
...
This thread needs more beer.

Nice results Mrfred, that car must pull like a freight train.

- Bryan
More beer indeed. Yeah, it pulls and pulls. Can see why I was interested in raising the rev limit to 8500 rpm.

Originally Posted by murlo26
This...VDR is extremely hit or miss, don't take those numbers and compare them to anything...not worth it. You are probably pretty close if not above that on VDR, personally i don't like VDR for the numbers game as its even worse than the "my dyno reads low" game, but it works as a tool or measuring a mod the same day type of thing. It's all just numbers anyway.
VDR is written around a spreadsheet I wrote about four years ago (and still use for all my tuning), so I'm obliged to say something. Comparison to dynos has shown it to be very representative of real dyno data if used properly. As you are probably suggesting, its all about whether its used properly.
Reply
Old Oct 6, 2010 | 12:29 PM
  #29  
3dman1's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 177
Likes: 0
From: kennewick wa
Boost tapers to 24.4 sorry i didnt see what you were holding. My guess its the cams and porting ?
Reply
Old Oct 6, 2010 | 01:40 PM
  #30  
criptballer's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 472
Likes: 0
From: Utah
do you know what timing you're hitting at peak tq and towards redline after 6k?
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 01:01 PM.