Notices
Evo X Dyno Results Discuss vendor and member dyno tuning techniques, results and graphs.

FP Black - 406whp/355wtq on e85

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 27, 2011 | 08:05 AM
  #16  
TheBlade's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 1,148
Likes: 0
From: Phoenix, AZ
Originally Posted by MR. EVO MR
you only get lag in wrong gear, fpblack is an insane turbo. I ****ing had 542whp and it scared each and every passenger when it hit.

OP try if you can and get an e85 tune and raise the boost to 35+, your still holding the turbo back, she didn't open up yet.

Uhmm he DID say he was tuned on E85.
Reply
Old Sep 27, 2011 | 08:26 AM
  #17  
phishy's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 325
Likes: 0
From: Brea, CA - Orange County
Jeeebuz full torque @ 4.3k that thing must feel like a rocket once u get passed 3500k.

I'm wondering if you can provide PSI in your chart, I wanna see if this is holding @ 26 or how bad (if any is it plumping down to)

Yea on E85 you can get much more power however, OP said he is going conservative - after all it's his / her DD.

Grats. Makes me wanna go black but no E85 in OC -.- besides one in Anaheim. If you can please get the PSI chart
Reply
Old Sep 27, 2011 | 12:16 PM
  #18  
tylersvtford's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
From: Canada
Great numbers!
Reply
Old Sep 28, 2011 | 07:17 AM
  #19  
KJ82's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 529
Likes: 0
From: Iraq; New Jersey
FPBlack is definitely a bad a$$ turbo...! Lag??? Unoticeable...!
Reply
Old Oct 3, 2011 | 09:06 PM
  #20  
RALLInspired's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 60
Likes: 0
From: Whittier, Ca
Oh goodness people and their numbers. 4 things to point out. For the sake of keeping things in one piece 360lb-ft of torque is where things to should kept to avoid ANY issues. 2nd im not one of those people that is all about how low his dyno reads but understand our dyno does read low. E-***** numbers are not what i am about. I use my dyno as a tool and nothing more. A perfectly stock 2011 (the "best" of the factory evo tunes) makes 217whp and 239 lb-ft. https://www.evolutionm.net/forums/ev...linspired.html The car makes 460whp at RRE. An evo X making 340hp there made 260whp in 4th gear here. I know it because i've tuned on their dyno more than anyone but themselves. 3rd this car had a ID1000cc and they were completely maxed out at 26psi FLAT. Lastly i prefer to use timing over boost on e85 on stock bottom ends. The FP black is my favorite stock framed turbo for the X. This car is a beast on the roads.

Rick B.
Reply
Old Oct 3, 2011 | 09:34 PM
  #21  
TheBlade's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 1,148
Likes: 0
From: Phoenix, AZ
Originally Posted by RALLInspired
Oh goodness people and their numbers. 4 things to point out. For the sake of keeping things in one piece 360lb-ft of torque is where things to should kept to avoid ANY issues. 2nd im not one of those people that is all about how low his dyno reads but understand our dyno does read low. E-***** numbers are not what i am about. I use my dyno as a tool and nothing more. A perfectly stock 2011 (the "best" of the factory evo tunes) makes 217whp and 239 lb-ft. https://www.evolutionm.net/forums/ev...linspired.html The car makes 460whp at RRE. An evo X making 340hp there made 260whp in 4th gear here. I know it because i've tuned on their dyno more than anyone but themselves. 3rd this car had a ID1000cc and they were completely maxed out at 26psi FLAT. Lastly i prefer to use timing over boost on e85 on stock bottom ends. The FP black is my favorite stock framed turbo for the X. This car is a beast on the roads.

Rick B.
QFT

Maxed out fuel is maxed out fuel, and back to my original reply I still thing that thing would be like going to Ludicrous Speed when the turbo comes on. Grats to the OP!
Reply
Old Oct 4, 2011 | 05:35 AM
  #22  
novaspyder87's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 218
Likes: 1
From: montreal,QC
i never saw someone on E85 using something small like 1000cc injectors....i do think that you need 1200-1300cc!!! and my god you have cams and everything and only 406!!! definitively have a problem there!!!

my fp red without cams on 91oct at 25psi has done more power!!!??? thats weird...before anybody says something i wasnt on a dynojet lol i was on a dynodynamic!!!

you should easily be around 450-470whp!!!! my red is going to be 500whp on 50/50meth at 32psi!!!

check that man for sure your car is fast by its a waste right now!!

thats my opinion!!! nice mods keep going
Reply
Old Oct 5, 2011 | 12:54 PM
  #23  
TheBlade's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 1,148
Likes: 0
From: Phoenix, AZ
Originally Posted by novaspyder87
i never saw someone on E85 using something small like 1000cc injectors....i do think that you need 1200-1300cc!!! and my god you have cams and everything and only 406!!! definitively have a problem there!!!

my fp red without cams on 91oct at 25psi has done more power!!!??? thats weird...before anybody says something i wasnt on a dynojet lol i was on a dynodynamic!!!

you should easily be around 450-470whp!!!! my red is going to be 500whp on 50/50meth at 32psi!!!

check that man for sure your car is fast by its a waste right now!!

thats my opinion!!! nice mods keep going
I'm thinking the thread was TL;DR.
He's making the power he wants for what he has. It *is* capable of more.
Reply
Old Oct 5, 2011 | 01:48 PM
  #24  
RazorLab's Avatar
EvoM Guru
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 14,094
Likes: 1,092
From: Mid-Hudson, NY
Originally Posted by novaspyder87
i never saw someone on E85 using something small like 1000cc injectors....i do think that you need 1200-1300cc!!! and my god you have cams and everything and only 406!!! definitively have a problem there!!!

my fp red without cams on 91oct at 25psi has done more power!!!??? thats weird...before anybody says something i wasnt on a dynojet lol i was on a dynodynamic!!!

you should easily be around 450-470whp!!!! my red is going to be 500whp on 50/50meth at 32psi!!!

check that man for sure your car is fast by its a waste right now!!

thats my opinion!!! nice mods keep going
This post needs more exclamation points, comparing different dynos, not putting fuel limitations in the picture, tuner and owner limits acknowledgment and just general respect.
Reply
Old Oct 5, 2011 | 02:02 PM
  #25  
itzwolf's Avatar
Evolved Member
20 Year Member
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,193
Likes: 2
From: Florida
Originally Posted by razorlab
This post needs more exclamation points, comparing different dynos, not putting fuel limitations in the picture, tuner and owner limits acknowledgment and just general respect.
You made my eyes water from laughing...
Reply
Old Oct 5, 2011 | 02:06 PM
  #26  
itzwolf's Avatar
Evolved Member
20 Year Member
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,193
Likes: 2
From: Florida
To the OP, congrats on the car. I personally think the numbers look just fine with everything in consideration and can appreciate the fact you have self control to limit the car and enjoy it. I hope to go this route on my X very shortly...
Reply
Old Oct 5, 2011 | 02:24 PM
  #27  
evo 9 guy's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 357
Likes: 1
From: California
Just curious, did you mean ARP headstuds or did you actually drop the pan and do the rod bolts?
Reply
Old Oct 6, 2011 | 12:22 PM
  #28  
RALLInspired's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 60
Likes: 0
From: Whittier, Ca
This is exactly why forums are a waste of time. Too many know it alls. You were right when we chatted a while back Bryan LMAO. Even doing this everyday from 9am-3am sometimes i'll just never get around to the level knowledge some of these forum guys operate on.

Here is an example of cars i've tuned on other dynos... the data speaks for itself.

RRE dynapak


DynoDynamics


Both are stock blocks. One without cams the other with. Both 26 psi flat just like the OP. I'm not into blowing stuff up either so the moment internals are upgraded making more power will be easy on all of these cars. Ego does not get in the way of clouding my judgment when tuning and i know where these cars should be at in respect to my dyno. The 2nd graph is my tune compared to another well respected local shop. I do kinda like do this stuff once in a while.

i appreciate some of you looking out for the OP.

Rick B.

Last edited by RALLInspired; Oct 6, 2011 at 12:47 PM.
Reply
Old Oct 14, 2011 | 01:07 AM
  #29  
Fishstix's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,308
Likes: 3
From: quwew
To me these are good numbers considering what a stock Evo makes on that dyno and good spool on stock block.
My tune sucks.
Reply
Old Oct 14, 2011 | 11:29 AM
  #30  
blazar_bis's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolving Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 104
Likes: 0
From: San Diego
Originally Posted by itzwolf
To the OP, congrats on the car. I personally think the numbers look just fine with everything in consideration and can appreciate the fact you have self control to limit the car and enjoy it. I hope to go this route on my X very shortly...
Thank you ! If you end up going this route you won't be disappointed at all ! are you planning to build your engine?
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 08:55 AM.