philamthebest's 2011 Evo X Tuned... Finally....

Subscribe
Apr 9, 2012 | 08:11 PM
  #31  
Is the Red a direct replacement or you need to make other changes?
Reply 0
Apr 18, 2012 | 09:19 PM
  #32  
Quote: Is the Red a direct replacement or you need to make other changes?
You will need to change the injectors to handle the fuel and obviously you will need a tune. Injector dynamics do a plug and play kit which is really good.
Reply 0
Apr 22, 2012 | 11:21 AM
  #33  
I like this!
Reply 0
Apr 25, 2012 | 06:23 PM
  #34  
Those are some great numbers!
Reply 0
Apr 29, 2012 | 05:41 AM
  #35  
it appears to be factory turbo, is that the case?

nice numbers regardless!
Reply 0
Apr 30, 2012 | 06:49 AM
  #36  
Quote: Great numbers!

So this means there is roughly 10% difference between their dynos. Good to know. I'm shooting for 360-370whp on a MD, which will be roughly 400whp on a DJ.
Yes, the difference from a Mustang to a Dynojet is about 10%, often a bit less though it seems to depend somewhat on how the two dynos are set up. I'm at the limits of my knowledge in this regards, but I now understand that atmospheric conditions and other settings will cause the discrepancy between the two dyno types to change.

Nonetheless, NASA, for classing purposes, induces a 10% adjustment up to Mustang dyno results to account for the discrepancy. Unless you are classing a race car or win a prize or something for HP numbers it is a moot point to compare one dyno to another. There are just too many variables to impact the results. Better is to compare your results over time on the same dyno, irrespective of the type.
Reply 0
Apr 30, 2012 | 09:38 AM
  #37  
Quote: it appears to be factory turbo, is that the case?

nice numbers regardless!
The turbo is stock size, but not exactly factory. Will generate a fair more then a factory turbo. I would have liked to see more with the numbers, but i'm happy with this especially as it's a DD.
Reply 0
Subscribe