Notices
Evo X Dyno Results Discuss vendor and member dyno tuning techniques, results and graphs.

Heath's 536whp Pumpgas Evo X

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 31, 2012 | 01:53 PM
  #1  
JohnBradley's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
Shutterbug
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (30)
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 11,406
Likes: 78
From: Northwest
Heath's 536whp Pumpgas Evo X

Heath bought his 2012 to replace an almost 700whp Evo 8 and had alot of the same goals. As we all know some of the 2012s started off with a little less power than we hoped per mod and Heath's was one of those.

After all his bolt ons on the stock turbo he managed to get 342/321 on a 28psi spike.



So it was back to the drawing board for Heath and he settled on an ETS 6262 kit and the needed parts to make this work on the stock motor. From that we got the car to make 487/340 (492/350 uncorrected) at 27.8psi



It didnt take long to learn that the 2012 ROM does some funky things at high airflow and power levels. It was not consistent in AFR per gear, or per pull as far as that goes, and would randomly drop 5-7* of timing. This lead to a damaged sparkplug which brought the car back to us to investigate. After some fooling around I found that benchflashing a 2010 ROM to the car cured all the inconsistency issues I had seen (see Power Variance thread) and we were back to game on.

In the meantime, Heath decided that a built motor and valvesprings were a good invetment so we tore down his 3700 mile old motor and did one of our standard 2.0L stock sleeve/stock bore builds-

ER Spec'd 2.0L 4B11T
JE FSR drop in 86mm pistons
Manley I beam rods
ACL bearings
GSC valvesprings
FIC 900
ER Spec double pumper
Stock cams, Intake, head porting
ETS 6262 T3 kit (0.82 A/r)
ETS 4" intake pipe kit with 3.5" MAF
ETS 3" FMIC kit with piping
ETS Quiet exhaust

Today I went back to the dyno and started making some pulls and tested the water of this now 9k rpm capable motor. The first pull was 458whp @ 23psi so I was encouraged by what I saw and started turning the boost up till I got to this-



Here is the start to finish to compare all phases of Heath's build so far. The next step will be more RPM, more boost on racegas, and we'll see where it goes from there.



Green is stock turbo @28psi
Red is 6262/stock motor @27.8psi
Blue is 6262 built motor @ 28.5psi

Aaron
Reply
Old Oct 31, 2012 | 02:12 PM
  #2  
Grind3r's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Apr 2012
Posts: 228
Likes: 1
From: Vancouver, WA
Nice #'s
Reply
Old Oct 31, 2012 | 04:19 PM
  #3  
CaptainBoosT's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 38
Likes: 0
From: Happy Valley
is that usual for the torque to be around 369 at the 536 hp level for a 2.0 ? i remember my 2.3 making 386 torque at only 381 whp curious what could all affect that and how important torque really is , can u really feel the difference with a car with same peak hp but has more torque
Reply
Old Oct 31, 2012 | 05:49 PM
  #4  
JohnBradley's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
Shutterbug
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (30)
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 11,406
Likes: 78
From: Northwest
Originally Posted by CaptainBoosT
is that usual for the torque to be around 369 at the 536 hp level for a 2.0 ? i remember my 2.3 making 386 torque at only 381 whp curious what could all affect that and how important torque really is , can u really feel the difference with a car with same peak hp but has more torque
Its all turbo dependent really, the later it spools the less torque it makes for the horsepower.

HP = TQ * RPM / 5252

So your car making 381/386 was probably a smaller turbo (stock or Green) on a 2.3 so it made the 386 low and was down to probably 300 ft lbs at peak power (6500?) This spools later, makes peak torque at nearly 7k even though its lit off at 5500.

So when you take 369 ft lbs at 7k and pump it back into that formula-

369 * 7000 = 2583000 / 5252 = 491whp

My 3586 equipped IX made 575/400 on the 2.0L at 29psi where on the 2.4 it did 648/478at 29psi and the torque happened almost a 1000 rpm sooner. On a 2.0L with the stock turbo it made 435/400 at 32psi and was making that peak torque 1500rpm sooner than even the 2.4 did on the big turbo.

Aaron
Reply
Old Nov 1, 2012 | 03:54 AM
  #5  
evoRS06's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 152
Likes: 0
From: Oak Harbor, WA
Aladeen motha trucka!!
Reply
Old Nov 1, 2012 | 08:30 AM
  #6  
JohnBradley's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
Shutterbug
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (30)
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 11,406
Likes: 78
From: Northwest
Hairy Potter
Reply
Old Nov 1, 2012 | 09:14 AM
  #7  
murlo26's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 4,119
Likes: 1
From: Minnesota
Nice looking setup, 6262 looks like a solid setup.

Race gas time though! I wanna see 700whp
Reply
Old Nov 1, 2012 | 09:37 AM
  #8  
SRToad4's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 364
Likes: 1
From: Scottsdale, AZ
Wow, awesome setup.
Reply
Old Nov 1, 2012 | 10:59 AM
  #9  
scheides's Avatar
EvoM Moderator
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 4,827
Likes: 13
From: Minneapolis
Stock cams still but with GSC Beehive's? What! Awesome!
Reply
Old Nov 1, 2012 | 11:06 AM
  #10  
Wicked_White10's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Sep 2012
Posts: 184
Likes: 0
From: St. Paul, MN
Really nice numbers. "I like where this is going" *Quagmire voice*
Reply
Old Nov 1, 2012 | 11:28 AM
  #11  
ETS Michael's Avatar
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (91)
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 8,685
Likes: 54
From: Vancouver, WA
Looks like a fun street car to me!
Reply
Old Nov 1, 2012 | 01:41 PM
  #12  
Showbizz41's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 288
Likes: 0
From: Las Vegas, NV
Very very nicely done!
Reply
Old Nov 1, 2012 | 05:07 PM
  #13  
JohnBradley's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
Shutterbug
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (30)
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 11,406
Likes: 78
From: Northwest
Originally Posted by scheides
Stock cams still but with GSC Beehive's? What! Awesome!
Yeah, long story on that one. Still stock 2012 camshafts and stock head but I think if there is budget in the future the head needs ported. I would like to see a ported head with 1mm over or larger valves and some aggressive camshafts.

Aaron
Reply
Old Nov 2, 2012 | 10:57 AM
  #14  
E-SPEC INDUSTRIES's Avatar
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 612
Likes: 0
From: NY
Originally Posted by JohnBradley
Yeah, long story on that one. Still stock 2012 camshafts and stock head but I think if there is budget in the future the head needs ported. I would like to see a ported head with 1mm over or larger valves and some aggressive camshafts.

Aaron
Nice job behind the keyboard-- Power curve is perfecto!!

That turbo kit is badass!!!
Reply
Old Nov 2, 2012 | 11:25 AM
  #15  
JohnBradley's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
Shutterbug
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (30)
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 11,406
Likes: 78
From: Northwest
Thanks my friend
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
JohnBradley
Evo X Dyno Results
12
Aug 25, 2014 11:45 AM
JohnBradley
Evo X Dyno Results
13
Oct 27, 2013 07:37 PM
JohnBradley
Project Cars / Build Threads
54
May 30, 2012 07:01 AM
JohnBradley
Evo Dyno Tuning / Results
21
Apr 9, 2012 11:29 AM
JohnBradley
Evo Dyno Tuning / Results
12
Jul 12, 2010 10:44 AM




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 08:28 AM.