2013 Gsr EF4 500+whp
For the record, based on the graph looks to me it's just adding 400lbs to occupant weight right? Seems pretty accurate. =P
The graph looks straight with minimal bends so even on a scale of 6 for smoothing this is still 500+ ON THE STOCK BLOCK for all those hater out there... just saying
The graph looks straight with minimal bends so even on a scale of 6 for smoothing this is still 500+ ON THE STOCK BLOCK for all those hater out there... just saying
with a higher smoothing that's gonna fall down in power. the top end has a tail that goes up. that's very common with vd with smoothing 1. set it to 6 and it will be around 510whp or so.
also you wrote this under the graph; VD calibrated to Local Dynos (Dynapack and Mustojet) (FYI)
the graph you posted is dynojet #. whenever you modify the correction factor in vd it will no longer display dynojet at the top, and instead it will say custom CF = 1.XX
----------
on another note, nice tune Jon. tq looks nice and flat and safe, just the way it should be on a stock block!
also you wrote this under the graph; VD calibrated to Local Dynos (Dynapack and Mustojet) (FYI)
the graph you posted is dynojet #. whenever you modify the correction factor in vd it will no longer display dynojet at the top, and instead it will say custom CF = 1.XX
----------
on another note, nice tune Jon. tq looks nice and flat and safe, just the way it should be on a stock block!
Last edited by tscompusa; Mar 24, 2013 at 12:45 PM.
Thread Starter
Evolving Member
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 473
Likes: 0
From: SlowCal
with a higher smoothing that's gonna fall down in power. the top end has a tail that goes up. that's very common with vd with smoothing 1. set it to 6 and it will be around 510whp or so.
also you wrote this under the graph; VD calibrated to Local Dynos (Dynapack and Mustojet) (FYI)
the graph you posted is dynojet #. whenever you modify the correction factor in vd it will no longer display dynojet at the top, and instead it will say custom CF = 1.XX
----------
on another note, nice tune Jon. tq looks nice and flat and safe, just the way it should be on a stock block!
also you wrote this under the graph; VD calibrated to Local Dynos (Dynapack and Mustojet) (FYI)
the graph you posted is dynojet #. whenever you modify the correction factor in vd it will no longer display dynojet at the top, and instead it will say custom CF = 1.XX
----------
on another note, nice tune Jon. tq looks nice and flat and safe, just the way it should be on a stock block!
tested and verified
not sure what you mean? the virtual dyno in dynojet mode reads dead on with a dynojet. dynojet reads lower then RRE dyno. i have tons of comparisons of vd vs dynojets.
if you're trying to manipulate another dyno, id use the correction factor setting in virtual dyno instead.
are you saying that dynojet setting + 400lb = the other dynos in #'s?
if you're trying to manipulate another dyno, id use the correction factor setting in virtual dyno instead.
are you saying that dynojet setting + 400lb = the other dynos in #'s?
Thread Starter
Evolving Member
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 473
Likes: 0
From: SlowCal
not sure what you mean? the virtual dyno in dynojet mode reads dead on with a dynojet. dynojet reads lower then RRE dyno. i have tons of comparisons of vd vs dynojets.
if you're trying to manipulate another dyno, id use the correction factor setting in virtual dyno instead.
are you saying that dynojet setting + 400lb = the other dynos in #'s?
if you're trying to manipulate another dyno, id use the correction factor setting in virtual dyno instead.
are you saying that dynojet setting + 400lb = the other dynos in #'s?
Not too sure how that is confusing...