Notices
Evo X Engine Management / Tuning Forums Discuss the major engine management systems.

WORKS EVO X P2 Dyno chart

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 9, 2008 | 01:12 PM
  #16  
VWR32toEvoX's Avatar
Newbie
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 56
Likes: 0
From: Belmont, CA
Originally Posted by Jooyoung99
Mike@ RRE tuned a car with just a catback and drop in filter, and the car is putting more than 330 whp on dynapack (same dyno Work is using). That's almost 90 whp gain. I don't think it mods, it's the tune.
There is no reason to post one graph and talk about another and then complain about my tune. Your getting 50 more whp while spending far more money than me. Yet you seem to comare me to some mythical car that gained 90whp from just a tune with similar mods to me. If thats true, your tune is way off for all those mods. By your own standards, this other car is making almost the same power as you, and you claim to have all these mods. Oh yeah, incase you didnt know, more mods=more power. My car will never make the same power no matter how much you claim it should.

Have fun selling Ecutek, because thats clearly what your up to.
Reply
Old Jun 9, 2008 | 01:39 PM
  #17  
Jooyoung99's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 286
Likes: 0
From: Brea, CA
Originally Posted by VWR32toEvoX
There is no reason to post one graph and talk about another and then complain about my tune. Your getting 50 more whp while spending far more money than me. Yet you seem to comare me to some mythical car that gained 90whp from just a tune with similar mods to me. If thats true, your tune is way off for all those mods. By your own standards, this other car is making almost the same power as you, and you claim to have all these mods. Oh yeah, incase you didnt know, more mods=more power. My car will never make the same power no matter how much you claim it should.

Have fun selling Ecutek, because thats clearly what your up to.
My apologies. I didn't mean to sound like I was complaining about your tune. I'll drop this issue. And I swear I'm not trying to sell Ecutek.. If Opensource was available, I would use that. But can u us a favor and post the AFR graph?
Reply
Old Jun 9, 2008 | 01:43 PM
  #18  
Evo_Jay's Avatar
Evolved Member
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
iTrader: (17)
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 3,419
Likes: 14
From: Chico, CA (NOR-CAL)
Originally Posted by razorlab
Hey look the signature W power curve carried over to your X flashes too. Sweet
Reply
Old Jun 9, 2008 | 02:11 PM
  #19  
VWR32toEvoX's Avatar
Newbie
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 56
Likes: 0
From: Belmont, CA
Originally Posted by Jooyoung99
My apologies. I didn't mean to sound like I was complaining about your tune. I'll drop this issue. And I swear I'm not trying to sell Ecutek.. If Opensource was available, I would use that. But can u us a favor and post the AFR graph?
If thats what your really up to, then I am apologize for turning it into an issue. Sure did seem like you were complaining about the tune to me. I do not want to seem like I am here to sell for WORKS either. I just really liked their service, and to me, my results justified every penny I spent. But to be honest, I am really in the same camp as you, I would much rather do a self tune.

Compared to other tunes, besides the one you speak of, I really dont see much difference. I have seen results from a tune on similar mods anywhere from 35whp to 50whp. Do you think you could post this graph of the 90whp gain? Seems to me that others would be interested in seeing it as well. Thats some extreme gains that deserve to be shared (no matter how bad it make my tune look)!!

As for the A/F graph, I dont have it. It was really late at night when I finished, and I forgot to get it. I will ask for it and then post it. Maybe someone from the shop will see this and post it up for me. If possible, I will get the boost and A/F graph.
Reply
Old Jun 9, 2008 | 02:28 PM
  #20  
Jooyoung99's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 286
Likes: 0
From: Brea, CA
Originally Posted by VWR32toEvoX
If thats what your really up to, then I am apologize for turning it into an issue. Sure did seem like you were complaining about the tune to me. I do not want to seem like I am here to sell for WORKS either. I just really liked their service, and to me, my results justified every penny I spent. But to be honest, I am really in the same camp as you, I would much rather do a self tune.

Compared to other tunes, besides the one you speak of, I really dont see much difference. I have seen results from a tune on similar mods anywhere from 35whp to 50whp. Do you think you could post this graph of the 90whp gain? Seems to me that others would be interested in seeing it as well. Thats some extreme gains that deserve to be shared (no matter how bad it make my tune look)!!

As for the A/F graph, I dont have it. It was really late at night when I finished, and I forgot to get it. I will ask for it and then post it. Maybe someone from the shop will see this and post it up for me. If possible, I will get the boost and A/F graph.
Here is the graph of the "Mystery" Car I was talking about. He just has exhaust and drop in filter. He dynoed 267 whp with those two mods, and 320 whp after the tune (I originally said 330 whp, my bad).
Reply
Old Jun 9, 2008 | 02:59 PM
  #21  
STi2EvoX's Avatar
Evolved Member
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,849
Likes: 1
From: USA
Different correction factors possibly, as well as the fact that one car had bolt ons and one didn't. It's the gains that matter more than the baseline, but even the gains will be higher on a high reading dyno than they will be on a low reading dyno.
Reply
Old Jun 9, 2008 | 03:38 PM
  #22  
VWR32toEvoX's Avatar
Newbie
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 56
Likes: 0
From: Belmont, CA
Well, I guess we really were looking at relatively the same thing. This other graph only shows a 53whp gain. Pretty similar numbers if you ask me (mine showed about 45whp). Although, this graph shows a better torque gain than mine. If I can get the AFR, I will post that up. But that wont be until at least tomorrow.

As for the difference in the numbers, I agree with STi2EvoX, there are many things that could contribute to that (Temp, correction factor, humidity, Aatitude, etc.). Every dyno is different, even if its the same type.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Bill@WORKS
West Region
2
Oct 31, 2008 03:47 PM
Bill@WORKS
Motor Sports
1
Oct 23, 2008 07:22 AM
Bill@WORKS
Motor Sports
8
Sep 26, 2008 11:59 AM




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 11:14 PM.