correct stat rev limit ECUFlash definitions for USDM Evo 10 GSR
Thread Starter
EvoM Guru
iTrader: (50)
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 9,675
Likes: 132
From: Tri-Cities, WA // Portland, OR
OK, now that I added the definitions, what does the "Stationary Rev Limit Cross Under Max Speed Enable Delay" do?
Also, I never quite understood what the 2 numbers are for the rev limiter. Why is there a "Rev limiter on" and a "Rev limiter off" at a slightly lower number?
Also, I never quite understood what the 2 numbers are for the rev limiter. Why is there a "Rev limiter on" and a "Rev limiter off" at a slightly lower number?
New stuff: If the vehicle is moving, the stationary rev limit algorithm will not become active until the vehicle passes under "cross under speed" and the "delay" time has passed by. So if you set the cross under speed to 10 kph, and the delay time to 4 seconds, then once you cross under 10 kph, it will take 4 seconds before the stat rev limit will function. If you step on the gas pedal before the 4 seconds have passed, the motor will bounce off the rev limit (~7700 rpm).
Last edited by mrfred; Sep 28, 2009 at 08:48 AM.
Thanks for the feedback! The delay time now makes sense.
What about the regular rev limit. It has rev limit on (75xx RPM) and rev limit off (73xx RPM). Does that mean the rev limiter kicks in at 75xx and then turns off when the RPM drops below 73xx?
So to clean up the Stationary Rev Limit stuff in my definition files, what all needs to be removed? I see the following in the Evo10base:
In the beginning of the definition -
<scaling name="RPMStatLimit" units="units" toexpr="x*31.25" frexpr="x/31.25" format="%.0f" min="0" max="9000" inc="31.25" storagetype="uint16" endian="big"/>
And then down below in the "limits" -
<table name="Stationary Rev Limiter" category="Limits" type="2D" scaling="RPMStatLimit">
<table name="X" type="Static Y Axis" elements="2">
<data>Stationary Limiter ON</data>
<data>Stationary Limiter OFF</data>
</table>
</table>
And finally in the 52680015 -
<table name="Stationary Rev Limiter" address="53442"/>
Are these the 3 things that need to be removed?
Thanks
What about the regular rev limit. It has rev limit on (75xx RPM) and rev limit off (73xx RPM). Does that mean the rev limiter kicks in at 75xx and then turns off when the RPM drops below 73xx?
So to clean up the Stationary Rev Limit stuff in my definition files, what all needs to be removed? I see the following in the Evo10base:
In the beginning of the definition -
<scaling name="RPMStatLimit" units="units" toexpr="x*31.25" frexpr="x/31.25" format="%.0f" min="0" max="9000" inc="31.25" storagetype="uint16" endian="big"/>
And then down below in the "limits" -
<table name="Stationary Rev Limiter" category="Limits" type="2D" scaling="RPMStatLimit">
<table name="X" type="Static Y Axis" elements="2">
<data>Stationary Limiter ON</data>
<data>Stationary Limiter OFF</data>
</table>
</table>
And finally in the 52680015 -
<table name="Stationary Rev Limiter" address="53442"/>
Are these the 3 things that need to be removed?
Thanks
New stuff: If the vehicle is moving, the stationary rev limit algorithm will not become active until the vehicle passes under "cross under speed" and the "delay" time has passed by. So if you set the cross under speed to 10 kph, and the delay time to 4 seconds, then once you cross under 10 kph, it will take 4 seconds before the stat rev limit will function. If you step on the gas pedal before the 4 seconds have passed, the motor will bounce off the rev limit (~7700 rpm).
enterprise screwed up my rental reservation so i still have my evo and i tested out the no lift to shift idea i had; link below but it worked
https://www.evolutionm.net/forums/ev...ift-shift.html
https://www.evolutionm.net/forums/ev...ift-shift.html
Just found this: ) I was fighting this at the track yesterday, now I know why it didn't work for me.
Has anything else been found to be wrong? Is there a sticky thread that I missed that contains all these fixes?
Would the evo community be well served if we maintained a single repository for all current rom versions utilizing something like GIT for version control?
Has anything else been found to be wrong? Is there a sticky thread that I missed that contains all these fixes?
Would the evo community be well served if we maintained a single repository for all current rom versions utilizing something like GIT for version control?
I thought I would add these here in case anyone goes searching for them:
And for 555700xx or 555800xx
<scaling name="VehicleSpeedFreq" units="km/h" toexpr="x*0.25" frexpr="x/0.25" format="%.1f" min="0" max="64" inc="0.2" storagetype="uint16" endian="big"/>
<table name="Stationary Rev Limit" category="Limits" address="546A8" type="1D" scaling="RPMStatLimit"/>
<table name="Max Speed for Stationary Rev Limit" category="Limits" address="546A6" type="1D" scaling="VehicleSpeedFreq"/>
<table name="Stationary Rev Limit Cross Under Max Speed Enable Delay" category="Limits" address="546AA" type="1D" scaling="Time"/>
And for 52370024
<scaling name="VehicleSpeedFreq" units="km/h" toexpr="x*0.25" frexpr="x/0.25" format="%.1f" min="0" max="64" inc="0.2" storagetype="uint16" endian="big"/>
<table name="Stationary Rev Limit" category="Limits" address="54674" type="1D" scaling="RPMStatLimit"/>
<table name="Max Speed for Stationary Rev Limit" category="Limits" address="54672" type="1D" scaling="VehicleSpeedFreq"/>
<table name="Stationary Rev Limit Cross Under Max Speed Enable Delay" category="Limits" address="54676" type="1D" scaling="Time"/>
And for 555700xx or 555800xx
<scaling name="VehicleSpeedFreq" units="km/h" toexpr="x*0.25" frexpr="x/0.25" format="%.1f" min="0" max="64" inc="0.2" storagetype="uint16" endian="big"/>
<table name="Stationary Rev Limit" category="Limits" address="546A8" type="1D" scaling="RPMStatLimit"/>
<table name="Max Speed for Stationary Rev Limit" category="Limits" address="546A6" type="1D" scaling="VehicleSpeedFreq"/>
<table name="Stationary Rev Limit Cross Under Max Speed Enable Delay" category="Limits" address="546AA" type="1D" scaling="Time"/>
And for 52370024
<scaling name="VehicleSpeedFreq" units="km/h" toexpr="x*0.25" frexpr="x/0.25" format="%.1f" min="0" max="64" inc="0.2" storagetype="uint16" endian="big"/>
<table name="Stationary Rev Limit" category="Limits" address="54674" type="1D" scaling="RPMStatLimit"/>
<table name="Max Speed for Stationary Rev Limit" category="Limits" address="54672" type="1D" scaling="VehicleSpeedFreq"/>
<table name="Stationary Rev Limit Cross Under Max Speed Enable Delay" category="Limits" address="54676" type="1D" scaling="Time"/>
Sorry to dig an old thread, but this is the best place to stick it.
Whats about the ROM 53040010 or tephra's 53040110?
Seems as it is not working. Is the code for it deactivated or is it the wrong table?
Table address is: 53442
Michael
Whats about the ROM 53040010 or tephra's 53040110?
Seems as it is not working. Is the code for it deactivated or is it the wrong table?
Table address is: 53442
Michael
I'll answer this question myself.
I played with the table and searched for the value 5500 as this is the rev limiter stock (also in USDM 2009 GSR).
It was nothing near there so I tried the address from 53040008
53040008:
<table name="Stationary Rev Limiter" address="5467a" category="Limits" type="1D" scaling="RPMStatLimit"/>
It was also wrong from my ROM.
I found out that it just moved a few cells lower.
This is the correct and working definiton for 53040010:
<table name="Stationary Rev Limiter" category="Limits" address="5467e" type="1D" scaling="RPMStatLimit"/>
Should be good for the EDM and AUDM models.
Michael
I played with the table and searched for the value 5500 as this is the rev limiter stock (also in USDM 2009 GSR).
It was nothing near there so I tried the address from 53040008
53040008:
<table name="Stationary Rev Limiter" address="5467a" category="Limits" type="1D" scaling="RPMStatLimit"/>
It was also wrong from my ROM.
I found out that it just moved a few cells lower.
This is the correct and working definiton for 53040010:
<table name="Stationary Rev Limiter" category="Limits" address="5467e" type="1D" scaling="RPMStatLimit"/>
Should be good for the EDM and AUDM models.
Michael
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
truplayboy
Evo X Engine Management / Tuning Forums
2
Jan 13, 2010 07:33 PM





