They are the same tables.

 

Well, at lunch I tried out the new map. No P1235, but I got a u0167. I did have the AP hooked up to the ECU to log when this happened, but it was during my "passing" test (in 3rd gear) and the boost spiked to 28.4 as logged by the ECU.

 

The Cobb interface is counterintuitive in the race tuner program. Rather than have the load on the x-axis like ECUflash and ECUtek, Cobb has it on the y-axis. The RPM, on the other hand, is on the x-axis. I do not know why they do it like this. Every tuning softawre that I have used/seen (xede, Ecuflash, Ecutech, Tunerpro) has the load on the x-axis and the rpm on the y-axis. Cobb uses the opposite. I have no idea why they do this.

 

Not for the Evo 10 pro tuner. Evo 8/9 it still is, and yes, it sucks.

- Bryan

 

Ya, the AccessTuner Race (for mortals not in the pro tuner program), it is still twisted

 

That's a bummer, you should all bug Cobb to have it fixed. I remember the days of my brain twisted in knots because of it..

 

If as you mentioned, Cobb Pro-Tuner does have the tables set up like ECUflash/EcuTech, then I think Cobb does this in the AcessTuner Race on purpose.

They want to make it hard for people to copy their DLed maps into other other programs.

I logged one of their DLed maps on an Evo 10 using their software and the car ran rich (10.7:1) and the logged timing did not match the timing numbers in the 3D timing table. Strangely, there was little to no knock retard I am still looking for an explanation.

I find it hillarious that Cobb thinks that others will copy this map and put it on other cars