Notices
Evo X Engine Management / Tuning Forums Discuss the major engine management systems.

Help Getting 2150's Dialed In

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 11, 2011 | 12:14 PM
  #16  
bandit09's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolving Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 159
Likes: 1
From: Ohio
I scaled it up a good amount in the top end, but in the lower/mid end, not so much:

Help Getting 2150's Dialed In-kxfzh.png
Reply
Old Aug 11, 2011 | 06:20 PM
  #17  
tephra's Avatar
EvoM Guru
15 Year Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 9,486
Likes: 67
From: Melbourne, Australia
what intake?

i think the stock one is 2.6"

so if your running the 3.5" primo you need to multiple the whole MAF scaling table by 1.34 (ie 3.5/2.6)
Reply
Old Aug 11, 2011 | 10:08 PM
  #18  
bandit09's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolving Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 159
Likes: 1
From: Ohio
yeah I'm on the Primo 3.5"

I remember scheides saying he multiplied his times 1.39 so I will take the stock maf tables and apply the * 1.39, reset ecu, and do a log and report back......
Reply
Old Aug 11, 2011 | 10:43 PM
  #19  
tephra's Avatar
EvoM Guru
15 Year Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 9,486
Likes: 67
From: Melbourne, Australia
cool!
Reply
Old Aug 12, 2011 | 07:15 AM
  #20  
Hiboost's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 3,222
Likes: 8
From: Rochester, NY
Just a heads up I had a strange instance where using the multply command didn't always work properly. Seems that some of the values in the first table of the 3 maf compensation tables can behave in this way and not actually change values. Looking at the graph for the table should reveal when this is happening though.
Reply
Old Aug 12, 2011 | 01:32 PM
  #21  
bandit09's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolving Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 159
Likes: 1
From: Ohio
Thanks....okay so that didn't help much but I've noticed that evoscan is not logging boost correctly and the highest load(fuel) that it's hitting is 90 but it should be hitting a lot higher, I'm hitting like 15 lbs of boost at like 3/4 throttle or so....and it says im only hit 2 PSI or so and it seems the load isn't hitting where it should be.

I have an OMNI 4-bar....

I've mentioned this above and posted the EVAL and requestID, any idea whats up? maybe this is why i'm having some issues...
Reply
Old Aug 12, 2011 | 09:32 PM
  #22  
bandit09's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolving Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 159
Likes: 1
From: Ohio
EDIT:

Nevermind, for some reason maptracer was being weird and was showing improper load and boost values, BUT that was because I hadn't loaded the ROM it was on the bottom half...I did that and everything was fixed and load axis went to 320 like it was supposed to...and now it's showing correct boost PSI and everything now.

So..here is my most recent data log. Got into boost a little bit on the way home (half throttle) and it suddenly cut out on me and wideband went ALL the way lean at half throttle and ~10 lbs of boost, probably 6k RPM's. Scared the **** out of me, logged 9 counts of knock.

Have no clue why.

AFR's all over the place, here is most recent log. This is with min IPW set to a low 1.104, and maf scaling at exactly 1.39 * stock over the whole thing

http://www.mediafire.com/?y7fq5jee79aajat
Reply
Old Aug 12, 2011 | 11:27 PM
  #23  
tephra's Avatar
EvoM Guru
15 Year Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 9,486
Likes: 67
From: Melbourne, Australia
stop going WOT until you get the low load stuff sorted.

given you didn't have the MAF scaled correctly down low, you compensated by leaning out the injectors.

i think if you go back to 1460cc your fuel map will behave a bit better

let me review the log now

edit - what you need todo is get some decent cruising logs

1) cruise for 5 mins on flat ground at 2000rpm
2) cruise for 5 mins on flat ground at 3500rpm

that will give you the differential you need and will let you approximate the latencies a bit better...

did you do the omni4bar patches (all of them)?

I take it you multiplied the whole maf scaling table by 1.3x/1.4x?
https://www.evolutionm.net/forums/9170522-post88.html

I would use 1.49 coz thats what MrFred used...

Last edited by tephra; Aug 12, 2011 at 11:35 PM.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Fast_Freddie
ECU Flash
309
Oct 30, 2023 01:56 AM
mrfred
ECU Flash
142
Aug 14, 2023 11:03 AM
4b11slayer
ECU Flash
16
Jul 28, 2017 10:33 AM
newbevouser
ECU Flash
16
Dec 30, 2016 08:38 AM
Appauldd
ECU Flash
452
Sep 21, 2015 08:39 AM




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 12:30 PM.