Notices
Evo X Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain Everything from engine builds to the best clutch and flywheel.

HKS turbo kit

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 25, 2009 | 07:00 PM
  #31  
heavyD's Avatar
Evolved Member
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 1,264
Likes: 1
From: Calgary, Alberta, Canada
Originally Posted by Boostfiend
actually heavyD that' s false. If you talk to the engineers at hyundai they will tell you that they indeed designed the 4B11. Take for instance the new Genesis coupes make about the same power that the Evo's do with the same bolt-on's.
Totally false. While Chrysler/Mitsubishi/Hyundai all share the same block design there are differences in how they are reinforced and manufactured. The 2.0L block in the genesis is not the same nor are the heads and the turbocharger is much smaller as well. It's an open deck block so it's limited in how much power can be made compared to the much more robust semi-closed deck of the 4B11. There were comparison pics of the blocks posted and you can see that they are of similar design but the 4B11 looks much beefier.
Reply
Old May 25, 2009 | 07:06 PM
  #32  
DepoRacing's Avatar
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 418
Likes: 0
From: North
Does AMS even have a turbo kit for sale yet? I would think this HKS kit works really well. The Garrett option seems best bang for buck once some tuners work out the problems.
Reply
Old May 25, 2009 | 08:18 PM
  #33  
evox44's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 113
Likes: 0
From: toronto
AMS will have a turbo kit soon for the X, as for now I see nothing on their website about a full turbo kit.
Reply
Old May 25, 2009 | 10:59 PM
  #34  
flyguycfi's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 644
Likes: 0
From: USA
AMS is working on a GT35R kit as we speak.
Reply
Old May 26, 2009 | 06:10 PM
  #35  
MACH3EVO's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 189
Likes: 0
From: Australia
guys i am not trying to start the **** fight over AMS and HKS

however I would buy this kit as I know how **** the Japs get.

seen it done been there, and yeah ....


funny how you see more people with HKS parts than say another company.

well this side of the world

and I get all the Jap EVO mags, never see AMS in their? or Buschur or FP
Reply
Old May 26, 2009 | 06:32 PM
  #36  
spdracerut's Avatar
Evolved Member
15 Year Member
Photogenic
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,331
Likes: 39
From: Hermosa Beach, CA
Originally Posted by heavyD
That's actually a good selling point. Some of the worst turbochargers have been by Garrett and now that Honeywell owns them I would even be more afraid. There's a reason many OEM's don't use Garrett anymore and it's because they put out too many crappy turbochargers like the T25 that couldn't last past the warranty periods without being replaced. Most of the OEM turbochargers these days are made by either MHI or Borg Warner.
HKS uses Garrett CHRAs, so center housing and wheels. HKS casts their own compressor and turbine housings.

Last I checked, Garrett/Honeywell Turbo owns over 50% of the turbocharger market with Borg warner owning roughly 25%. The rest is split between MHI, IHI, Holset, etc. I think Garrett owns like 75% of the diesel market as that was their focus at the end of the 90s. They're just getting back into gasoline with turbos on the BMW 4.4L V8 used in the 750i and X6, and Ford Ecoboost.

And I never had a problem with my Garrett T25 on my Nissan.

Anyways, back on topic. Like I said before, I don't like the fact that the HKS kit eliminates the benefits of the twin scroll design by using a regular turbine housing.
Reply
Old May 26, 2009 | 06:40 PM
  #37  
flyguycfi's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 644
Likes: 0
From: USA
Originally Posted by MACH3EVO
guys i am not trying to start the **** fight over AMS and HKS

however I would buy this kit as I know how **** the Japs get.

seen it done been there, and yeah ....


funny how you see more people with HKS parts than say another company.

well this side of the world

and I get all the Jap EVO mags, never see AMS in their? or Buschur or FP
Bias?
Reply
Old May 26, 2009 | 08:20 PM
  #38  
06evors's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 388
Likes: 0
From: Warminster, PA
Originally Posted by flyguycfi
Bias?
This. It's like saying "I never see Top Gear reviewing American cars, so that must mean they suck". Well they're brits so it's natural for them to favor them. Not hard to figure out.
Reply
Old May 26, 2009 | 11:11 PM
  #39  
tomatoEVO's Avatar
Account Disabled
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 991
Likes: 0
From: 私の家
http://www.hks-power.co.jp/db/produc...1003-AM002.pdf

this is what OP meant to post
Reply
Old May 26, 2009 | 11:27 PM
  #40  
evox44's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 113
Likes: 0
From: toronto
I have seen AMS and Bruchur and others in Modified Mag. They make good parts. The price you pay for HKS is more, so does that mean it's better? Well it is being shipped from JAPAN, so most of that extra money probably is being wasted on shipping and tariffs etc.
Reply
Old May 27, 2009 | 06:02 AM
  #41  
MACH3EVO's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 189
Likes: 0
From: Australia
sorry i will rephrase it, yes your right it did come across a tad bias however,

i sell and use Fp turbos very happy no issue,

ok as some have mentioned that HKS do a fair bit of R&D so what would the purpose of doing this manifold this way rather than the way of the factory design,

look i am open to ears personally looking at the full race manifold,

but i buy things once and buy them right.
Reply
Old May 27, 2009 | 08:39 AM
  #42  
tomatoEVO's Avatar
Account Disabled
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 991
Likes: 0
From: 私の家
Originally Posted by MACH3EVO
but i buy things once and buy them right.
preach.
Reply
Old May 27, 2009 | 08:49 AM
  #43  
06evors's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 388
Likes: 0
From: Warminster, PA
Originally Posted by MACH3EVO
i buy things once and buy them right.
Agreed.
Reply
Old May 27, 2009 | 09:23 AM
  #44  
Hiboost's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 3,222
Likes: 8
From: Rochester, NY
Any HKS built Evo X's planning on attending the Buschur Shootout? Would be a good time to test 1/4 mile performance with upgraded turbos. The only HKS item I have are 1 heat range colder spark plugs, the rest of the JDM products just don't seem to justify their price to performance ratio. I guess everyone can have their opinion of what is best but let's see the bench racing taken to the race track!
Reply
Old May 27, 2009 | 09:46 AM
  #45  
spdracerut's Avatar
Evolved Member
15 Year Member
Photogenic
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,331
Likes: 39
From: Hermosa Beach, CA
Originally Posted by MACH3EVO
ok as some have mentioned that HKS do a fair bit of R&D so what would the purpose of doing this manifold this way rather than the way of the factory design,

look i am open to ears personally looking at the full race manifold,

but i buy things once and buy them right.
I believe the reason HKS made this kit the way they did is purely due to costs. They already have a turbo, so they simply made an adapter that allowed them to use an existing turbo they already produce.

Wanting to keep the stock cast manifold is definitely logical for two reasons: it should be reliable (i.e. not crack) and its cheaper to keep it (rather than replace it or cast a new one).

So, in my opinion, they sacrificed performance for costs. Going to the undivided housing will hurt spool up and response. This is a non-issue on a drag car, but will hurt a street/road-course car.

They had the possible options of casting a new turbine housing like Garrett ($$$$$), or a new exhaust manifold ($$$), or make an adapter to bolt up an existing turbo (cheapest option and what they did).
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 12:38 AM.