4B11 engine failure documentation thread
I would imagine it depends where your tune is initially and also your fuel setup. I would say it is totally possible and it should affect each car different.
I don't have faith in this engine at all beyond bolt on + tuned stock turbo power. Heck, by this thread, some can't even handle that. These rings suck, and most of the failures are the same way. I like the car, but am close to jumping ship (already have it listed FS). I have 90whp more than stock, and trust it is fine like this, but won't risk a turbo kit due to all the failures of 11 second cars. A clean used CT9A is calling.
I don't have faith in this engine at all beyond bolt on + tuned stock turbo power. Heck, by this thread, some can't even handle that. These rings suck, and most of the failures are the same way. I like the car, but am close to jumping ship (already have it listed FS). I have 90whp more than stock, and trust it is fine like this, but won't risk a turbo kit due to all the failures of 11 second cars. A clean used CT9A is calling.
There are way more people running lots of power with no problems than there are people with problems.
As you can see most of these problems are from people doing their own tuning. I don't blame you though, I am every so slightly getting scared for my motor but it's not going to stop me.
I don't have faith in this engine at all beyond bolt on + tuned stock turbo power. Heck, by this thread, some can't even handle that. These rings suck, and most of the failures are the same way. I like the car, but am close to jumping ship (already have it listed FS). I have 90whp more than stock, and trust it is fine like this, but won't risk a turbo kit due to all the failures of 11 second cars. A clean used CT9A is calling.
If I'm not mistaken, I think the only downside is the cost of building it with aftermarket pistons/rods for added reliability. Yeah, that can be costly, but I still think I'll like my X over a IX as a DD.
Even so, I'll be 100% ok if my piston cracks, long as I can put aftermarket rods and pistons and rings in, I'll be ok.
keep in mind this car came to us from another dealership, with a bunch of parts (fmic, turbo, piping, injectors, etc etc and previously tuned by another shop... it was driven with a stock cat on a tune for a test pipe etc...
when we got it, the fuel trims were off by about 11% and we tuned it at low boost and said "we will not be responsible for anything on this car". The same dealer has brought us other evo's we have simply turned away because of the mods done, and the integrity being questionable.
I have the dyno charts for this car..
max AFR simply means the highest AFR point once the car was sitting in the test window on the mustang dyno, so if I was cruising at 2400 rpm, hit the "start rpm" of 2450... while cruising, max could even read 14.7 AFR

I can upload the plot if need be!
cheers
cb
It's a little unsettling to me to see failures from shops like GST, HB speed, etc...
Why, because they are professionals... and I would trust them with my own car...
Seeing that, proves to me that there are issues elsewhere...
Oh well, Maybe ill do a cossie motor in my X now to prevent any issues, since we have to do some articles for a well known magazine with our own car.
cb
Why, because they are professionals... and I would trust them with my own car...
Seeing that, proves to me that there are issues elsewhere...
Oh well, Maybe ill do a cossie motor in my X now to prevent any issues, since we have to do some articles for a well known magazine with our own car.
cb








