Notices
Evo X Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain Everything from engine builds to the best clutch and flywheel.

Cams on a Stock turbo...Good or Bad?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 15, 2011 | 06:45 AM
  #1  
The_X_Effect's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolving Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 437
Likes: 6
From: Saukvegas, WI
Cams on a Stock turbo...Good or Bad?

I am very intrested in getting bigger cams for my X. I wont be upgrading my turbo for another year or two probably closer to 2. I was told that GSC S2's (274) would be fine as long as i had a good mivec tune. Could i go bigger then 274? I would be going to AMS for the tune and most likely have them install them too. What are your thoughts on bigger cams. Would probably replace the springs and retainers as well as new arp studs. I understand the awful driveabilty you have at low rpms but im ok it that i rarely am every in stop and go traffic.

What about AMS cams are those strictly for an upgraded turbo?
Reply
Old Jul 15, 2011 | 07:57 AM
  #2  
Mad_SB's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 2,138
Likes: 0
From: Georgia
You will get bigger gains for the same or less money with an upgraded stock frame turbo. I know that is not what you asked but.... I went cam route and did not get my money worth on my X. IMO do a BBXL first and cams latter...

You will see gains across the powerband with cams even on stock turbo but.. the stock turbo does not really flow enough for the power not to peak real early with bigger cams.... In other words you may see a gain of 30whp across the rev range, but the power may also peak at 6,500 rpm ...

On the other hand a bbxl with stock cams will gain more than 30whp and the peak power will be at the rev limiter.
Reply
Old Jul 15, 2011 | 10:58 AM
  #3  
RB185AFM's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 250
Likes: 1
From: Pittsburg
Cams shift were the power is made and the shift is up. As the stock turbo runs out of breath at 5k cams dont really do much and cost alot. I would put my money else were. Once you upgrade your turbo to something that can make power in the upper rpm range, cams will make a big difference.
Reply
Old Jul 15, 2011 | 12:52 PM
  #4  
MarkM's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 404
Likes: 0
From: NI
My mx1s didn't really give much in the way of peak gains, but down low the extra torque is immense
Reply
Old Jul 15, 2011 | 03:30 PM
  #5  
The_X_Effect's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolving Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 437
Likes: 6
From: Saukvegas, WI
Originally Posted by MarkM
My mx1s didn't really give much in the way of peak gains, but down low the extra torque is immense
Some extra torque down low would be nice and ik i wont get tramendous gains on a stock turbo. I just am wondering how safe and how big I could go i.e. 272?274?280??? (is that too big?) I do plan on upgrading my turbo and i may just do that first but like i said i am just wondering if its safe to go with bigger cams on a stock turbo??????
I also love how bad *** cams make ur car sound espically at idle.
Reply
Old Jul 16, 2011 | 01:42 AM
  #6  
The_X_Effect's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolving Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 437
Likes: 6
From: Saukvegas, WI
Any one else have any other input on doing this???
Reply
Old Jul 16, 2011 | 01:47 AM
  #7  
3grst01's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 210
Likes: 1
From: Ohio
You should call map performance or spec ops motorsports and talk to them. Both very good peoples with extensive knowledge on this. http://www.specopsmotorsports.com/ http://www.maperformance.com/
Reply
Old Jul 16, 2011 | 08:40 AM
  #8  
Widoww's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 332
Likes: 0
From: Canada
Jeff Pippi out i'n Canada here is running full bolts ons and te mx1"sand has won 5 time attack events straight going for 6 tomorrow.

Compared to my mr his car down low rips away down low and have to play catchup always

I'd think mx1 on stock turbo is a good choice an u can still use with a bigger turbo later
Reply
Old Jul 17, 2011 | 12:03 PM
  #9  
sstevojr's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 2,558
Likes: 0
From: 805-Conejo Valley
http://www.roadraceengineering.com/d...HTUNED-375.jpg

This should give you an idea of what a fully tuned cam can do on the stock turbo. This is from RRE, so you know its not some BS. As mentioned, not much change on the top end, but the mid range is whole new BEAST!!!
Of course, different cams w/ tuning can shift that gain to different areas as need be.
Reply
Old Jul 17, 2011 | 02:45 PM
  #10  
cnj4ever's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 218
Likes: 0
From: Columbus, GA
Originally Posted by sstevojr
http://www.roadraceengineering.com/d...HTUNED-375.jpg

This should give you an idea of what a fully tuned cam can do on the stock turbo. This is from RRE, so you know its not some BS. As mentioned, not much change on the top end, but the mid range is whole new BEAST!!!
Of course, different cams w/ tuning can shift that gain to different areas as need be.
what cams where these, that is actually a pretty good improvement, would be great for AutoX
Reply
Old Jul 17, 2011 | 02:58 PM
  #11  
Robevo RS's Avatar
Evolved Member
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 10,535
Likes: 60
From: Park Ridge N.J.
as many say it here you dont get those peak numbers, as you would do with a turbo upgrade. But a same time u will get a much more and more frequently used mid-range power. For me is way more important then a peak numbers. Also the whole power curb will be much beefier.
So yes it is a good investment, but you should not get 274's for stock turbo. Unless you are planning to get a turbo upgrade later. I would go for a Cosworth cams for stock turbo max. You should get something around 264 for stock set up if the cosworth doesn't fit for your budget.
I am always doing the same way . The last i upgrade on the car is the turbo. There is sooo much more you should, and can do with the engine before you start running bigger turbo.
But of course that is my opinion only.

Rob
Reply
Old Jul 18, 2011 | 02:23 AM
  #12  
The_X_Effect's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolving Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 437
Likes: 6
From: Saukvegas, WI
Originally Posted by Robevo RS
as many say it here you dont get those peak numbers, as you would do with a turbo upgrade. But a same time u will get a much more and more frequently used mid-range power. For me is way more important then a peak numbers. Also the whole power curb will be much beefier.
So yes it is a good investment, but you should not get 274's for stock turbo. Unless you are planning to get a turbo upgrade later. I would go for a Cosworth cams for stock turbo max. You should get something around 264 for stock set up if the cosworth doesn't fit for your budget.
I am always doing the same way . The last i upgrade on the car is the turbo. There is sooo much more you should, and can do with the engine before you start running bigger turbo.
But of course that is my opinion only.

Rob
I want to get the 274's cause i do have plans for a bigger turbo down the road just might take a year or two to get it (gotta buy a house first). So I wanted to get a Stage 2 cam so i wouldnt have to worry about getting something bigger later. I was told 274's with a good tune will be fine.

I would also like to know what cams RRE was using for that evo. Those are solid numbers for a stock turbo.

Last edited by The_X_Effect; Jul 18, 2011 at 02:27 AM.
Reply
Old Jul 18, 2011 | 03:52 AM
  #13  
Robevo RS's Avatar
Evolved Member
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 10,535
Likes: 60
From: Park Ridge N.J.
Originally Posted by The_X_Effect
I want to get the 274's cause i do have plans for a bigger turbo down the road just might take a year or two to get it (gotta buy a house first). So I wanted to get a Stage 2 cam so i wouldnt have to worry about getting something bigger later. I was told 274's with a good tune will be fine.

I would also like to know what cams RRE was using for that evo. Those are solid numbers for a stock turbo.
if you have a plan for going bigger turbo then yes get a 272"s. or higher. I do beilve the 280"s are just too big for 99% of the applications.
There is an interesting combo also you might consider, is the 264 exhaust and the 274 intake
I runned 274 's in my VIII on stock turbo, worked great. And those engine are basically handy capped vs the 4B11. The dual mivec and the turbo is a big plus in the 4B11. for a bigger cams. Also the better flowing head design.

Rob
Reply
Old Jul 19, 2011 | 08:18 AM
  #14  
mitsael's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 207
Likes: 0
From: Wichita ,KS
Nah is not worth it bro i did put on my car G1 cams on the stock turbo and did not saw the number that i want it it stay pretty close to same number i already had it before. If you gonna do it right do turbo and G2 cams with valve springs and retainers.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
4g63kid
For Sale/WTB - Engine / Drivetrain / Power
6
Mar 21, 2017 06:08 AM
moey124
Evo Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain
1
Nov 3, 2015 08:35 AM
99evoVI
Evo Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain
9
Sep 10, 2015 03:57 AM
scothu
Evo Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain
24
Sep 28, 2014 06:22 PM
ryukinevo
Evo Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain
3
Aug 11, 2011 10:10 AM




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 06:29 AM.