Notices
Evo X General Discuss any generalized technical Evo X related topics that may not fit into the other forums.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: CARiD

Canadian EVO X spec sheet

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 11, 2007 | 03:52 PM
  #46  
EvilRob's Avatar
Evolved Member
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 618
Likes: 1
From: Michigan
Originally Posted by 04STi888
WOW! 3517 for GSR ..That's a bit heavy and with the STi being an ugly hatch i might just have to get BMW 135 instead! I was expecting 33**lb!
Lol how much do you think the 135i wieghs? Just curious.
Reply
Old Nov 11, 2007 | 04:16 PM
  #47  
evilution310's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 277
Likes: 0
From: LA
Originally Posted by sharpointer
Definitely. Even if the motor isnt mod friendly (of course it will be) a chip, exhaust and an intercooler will definitely be manageable. With those mods alone the 0-60 will be mid 4's. This is going to be a sick car no matter what anyone says
hey this guy can predict the future your like nostradamus
Reply
Old Nov 11, 2007 | 04:47 PM
  #48  
MR Turco's Avatar
EvoM Staff Alumni
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 3,233
Likes: 3
From: Massachusetts
heated seats, drool....
Reply
Old Nov 11, 2007 | 07:40 PM
  #49  
pltek's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (33)
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 1,245
Likes: 0
From: 2 places
at least there is a reason for that, V8 and not V6
Originally Posted by Robevo RS
its kinda like the new M3 .. they give you a list how much weight they shaved in the engine the body /carbon fiber roof exemple/ etc. And yet the new M3 is also much heavyer then any previus one...
Reply
Old Nov 11, 2007 | 08:36 PM
  #50  
Turbo Ghost's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 202
Likes: 0
From: USA
Originally Posted by 04STi888
WOW! 3517 for GSR ..That's a bit heavy and with the STi being an ugly hatch i might just have to get BMW 135 instead! I was expecting 33**lb!
on the BMW brochure it says the 135i weighs 1,560kg (or 3438 lbs)
Reply
Old Nov 11, 2007 | 09:13 PM
  #51  
Steiner's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 1,179
Likes: 0
From: Livermore, CA
Originally Posted by evo_z
3500+ lbs Evo X curb weight = 2008 STI for me!
+1

The CT9A platform was pleanty heavy enough. Now this one is even heavier. Overall I'm sure the X is going to be a great car. I'm skeptical it will posess the same tossability and raw feel that originally attracted a lot of us to the VIII or IX though. I'm hoping the new STI will fill the void.
Reply
Old Nov 11, 2007 | 10:14 PM
  #52  
Doc X's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 18
Likes: 0
135i weight

Correct weight (wrong on previous brochure) for 135i is 3373#(3384 for auto trans)
Reply
Old Nov 11, 2007 | 11:08 PM
  #53  
Red Dragon's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (17)
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 1,293
Likes: 0
From: Saskatoon, Canada
i just ordered my phantom black evo X MR premium yesterday! i so excited!

Cry me a river guys! the car is 200lbs heavier wop de doo! 3/4 of you guys complaining about weight the of the car probaly weights 200lb or more. if you want to lose weight run on tead mill and stop eating so much fast food. i dont think 200lbs is going to make a big difference on a street car. If your going to race with the car, just gut the car. If the car was 200lbs lighter eveyone would be winning and growning like a little girl and complaint that the car is too noisey, or the car has too much body roll, or it does not have navagation, or it does not have a sun roof, or it does not have yaw contol, or it does not have leather seats, or it does not have 9 air bags. all these new luxery items adds weight. BOO HOO. its just 200lbs! your average american weights over 200lbs.
Reply
Old Nov 11, 2007 | 11:28 PM
  #54  
DrSmile's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 437
Likes: 0
From: New Jersey
It is OVER 300 lbs heavier. Even compared to the heavier IX MR with the 6 spd. And if you don't think that is going to make a difference in handling, acceleration, or breaking drivetrain parts when modded then you're on crack.

I have no idea why anyone would buy an Evo to NOT go fast. For the money there are many better looking cars that offer better amenities. The Evo is the fastest, most nimble bang for the buck, or at least it was.

I *may* be a bit biased here because I owned an Audi S4, which was quite a porker at 3700 lbs. The weight made it handle so poorly I sold it and bought the Evo.

Last edited by DrSmile; Nov 11, 2007 at 11:48 PM.
Reply
Old Nov 12, 2007 | 08:01 AM
  #55  
3000ways's Avatar
Evolved Member
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 3,783
Likes: 0
From: Diamond Bar, California
Wow, just wow. 3517Lbs to 3594Lbs. Honestly I don't know what to say about this. I've tried defending this car to death and everytime it is something freakin' new. I can understand that people (including myself) would want this car because it is truly a improvement overall as a vehicle over the IX. For instances the EVO X now has more options such as Navi, cruise controls, and sh*t a butt load of airbags for safety. It now has steering wheel controls for the radio, and the SST tranny looks to be amazing. The interior is improved and there still seems like there is adequate if not better interior space. The suspension on the EVO X compared to the EVO IX is also more improved. Also seems like the driving experience is more mature with, better low end power and a more seamless power delivery. So I can see reasons to buy the EVO X, but as far as the raw performance, the reasons why I feel in love with the EVO, it doesn't seem like this is the focus of Mitsubishi and this current EVO.
Reply
Old Nov 12, 2007 | 08:03 AM
  #56  
3000ways's Avatar
Evolved Member
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 3,783
Likes: 0
From: Diamond Bar, California
Originally Posted by Doc X
Correct weight (wrong on previous brochure) for 135i is 3373#(3384 for auto trans)
Please provide link
Reply
Old Nov 12, 2007 | 08:16 AM
  #57  
evo_z's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 305
Likes: 0
From: North Las Vegas
Originally Posted by Red Dragon
i just ordered my phantom black evo X MR premium yesterday! i so excited!

Cry me a river guys! the car is 200lbs heavier wop de doo! 3/4 of you guys complaining about weight the of the car probaly weights 200lb or more. if you want to lose weight run on tead mill and stop eating so much fast food. i dont think 200lbs is going to make a big difference on a street car. If your going to race with the car, just gut the car. If the car was 200lbs lighter eveyone would be winning and growning like a little girl and complaint that the car is too noisey, or the car has too much body roll, or it does not have navagation, or it does not have a sun roof, or it does not have yaw contol, or it does not have leather seats, or it does not have 9 air bags. all these new luxery items adds weight. BOO HOO. its just 200lbs! your average american weights over 200lbs.
Clearly you don't understand the implications of 'just' 200lbs to a car's dynamics and performance. 200lbs more is basically what an VIII and a IX would weight with an average sized driver plus a full tank of gas. On an X, adding driver and fuel would easily tip the car's weight over 3700lbs! Now I see the real reason why they increased the size of the brakes, it's to compensate for the added weight! Before the stats where released for the X, I really looking forward to the prospects of trading in my VIII for X but now most of the numbers have been released, I think I may look towards the 08 STI or just keep the VIII and start modding.

Last edited by evo_z; Nov 12, 2007 at 08:20 AM.
Reply
Old Nov 12, 2007 | 08:39 AM
  #58  
EzeE1o's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 455
Likes: 0
From: the bay, Cali
Originally Posted by DrSmile
It is OVER 300 lbs heavier
nope, its 255 lbs...the US VIII was 3262 lbs, the CAN X is 3517
Reply
Old Nov 12, 2007 | 08:56 AM
  #59  
3000ways's Avatar
Evolved Member
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 3,783
Likes: 0
From: Diamond Bar, California
Originally Posted by evo_z
Clearly you don't understand the implications of 'just' 200lbs to a car's dynamics and performance. 200lbs more is basically what an VIII and a IX would weight with an average sized driver plus a full tank of gas. On an X, adding driver and fuel would easily tip the car's weight over 3700lbs! Now I see the real reason why they increased the size of the brakes, it's to compensate for the added weight! Before the stats where released for the X, I really looking forward to the prospects of trading in my VIII for X but now most of the numbers have been released, I think I may look towards the 08 STI or just keep the VIII and start modding.
I hate to say this, but I agree with you on pretty much everything except the 08 STI which as far as looks and hype is just as much of disappointment as the EVO X. Seriously though weight gains for vehicles should be expected, just look at how much the EVO VIII and EVO IX weigh in comparison to the EVO I to EVO III. But usually weight gains are accompanied by a substantial increase in power.

So in my opinion since Mitsubishi never rates horsepower accurately, the only way to see the power increase is to look at the torque increase.

EVO III
2780-2800Lbs
228lbs/ft

EVO IV
2970-2990Lbs
260lbs/ft

EVO V and EVO VI
2990-3010Lbs
274lbs/ft

EVO VII
3170-3200Lbs
282lbs/ft

Now here is where it gets tricky, US spec vehicles are different than the way they rate vehicles in Japan.

USDM EVO VIII
3200-3260Lbs
273lbs/ft

USDM EVO IX
3220-3300Lbs
289lbs/ft

USDM EVO X
3520-3600Lbs
300lbs/ft or 311lbs/ft???

So here is the problem, in the United States we are so use to seeing a cars rated horsepower to see if it has indeed gained power from generation to generation, but you have to examine the history of Mitsubishi and the EVO model to see how to tell the true power increase of the car. Never look at horsepower ratings, because Mitsubishi just doesn't rate Horsepower accurately. Look at the torque to determine true power gains. In all honesty we in the America have such a short history with EVO, that we assume weight gains and etc. is a new trend with Mitsubishi, when in reality this has happend before. For example I could only imagine the anger EVO V and EVO VI owners had when the much heavier and only slightly more powerful EVO VII came out. Despite this the EVO model continued and still gained popularity and the EVO VII went onto the EVO VIII and eventually the EVO IX in which many of us consider the best EVO ever. So what I am saying, is yes the EVO X is vastily different than the EVO IX, but eventually the EVO as far as performance will get better and better with the EVO XI and EVO XII and then the EVO XIII or later model will come out and we will play this haterade game again.
Reply
Old Nov 12, 2007 | 09:20 AM
  #60  
sblvro's Avatar
EvoM Community Team Leader
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 3,135
Likes: 6
From: chicago, michigan, arkansas
Originally Posted by 3000ways
I hate to say this, but I agree with you on pretty much everything except the 08 STI which as far as looks and hype is just as much of disappointment as the EVO X. Seriously though weight gains for vehicles should be expected, just look at how much the EVO VIII and EVO IX weigh in comparison to the EVO I to EVO III. But usually weight gains are accompanied by a substantial increase in power.

So in my opinion since Mitsubishi never rates horsepower accurately, the only way to see the power increase is to look at the torque increase.

EVO III
2780-2800Lbs
228lbs/ft

EVO IV
2970-2990Lbs
260lbs/ft

EVO V and EVO VI
2990-3010Lbs
274lbs/ft

EVO VII
3170-3200Lbs
282lbs/ft

Now here is where it gets tricky, US spec vehicles are different than the way they rate vehicles in Japan.

USDM EVO VIII
3200-3260Lbs
273lbs/ft

USDM EVO IX
3220-3300Lbs
289lbs/ft

USDM EVO X
3520-3600Lbs
300lbs/ft or 311lbs/ft???

So here is the problem, in the United States we are so use to seeing a cars rated horsepower to see if it has indeed gained power from generation to generation, but you have to examine the history of Mitsubishi and the EVO model to see how to tell the true power increase of the car. Never look at horsepower ratings, because Mitsubishi just doesn't rate Horsepower accurately. Look at the torque to determine true power gains. In all honesty we in the America have such a short history with EVO, that we assume weight gains and etc. is a new trend with Mitsubishi, when in reality this has happend before. For example I could only imagine the anger EVO V and EVO VI owners had when the much heavier and only slightly more powerful EVO VII came out. Despite this the EVO model continued and still gained popularity and the EVO VII went onto the EVO VIII and eventually the EVO IX in which many of us consider the best EVO ever. So what I am saying, is yes the EVO X is vastily different than the EVO IX, but eventually the EVO as far as performance will get better and better with the EVO XI and EVO XII and then the EVO XIII or later model will come out and we will play this haterade game again.
because there was something in common between the evo I to evo IX, the 4G63 DNA which the X doesn't have. It may be the best evo there is but it is not a "purist" evo anymore.
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 02:37 AM.